북한 민사관계법률에 대한 분석과 남한법률과의 비교법적 고찰
Analysis on the acts regulating the civil affairs of the Democratic Republic of People’s Korea and Comparative Legal Study with those of the Republic of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean peninsula was divided after the World War II into the Republic of Korea and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, then subsequently suffered the pains of the Korean War due to differences in ideologies. After this occurrence, both sides have established state union based on the differing ideologies, which led to the solidification of separation. So as to overcome conflicts, confrontations, fears of war, and agony of separated families during the last half-century, peaceful and democratic unification of the South and North Korea must be accomplished, which is the hope of all Koreans. After the separation, South and North Korea each has developed their own legal institutions from founding principles based on their ideologies. If the two Koreas are unable to overcome the differences, it will become a large obstacle to forthcoming unification. In order to resolve the problem, a clear and objective understanding on the laws of South and North Korea is essential, which means that we need to acknowledge the different realities in the unification process. Based on this foundation, we need to consider the process of integration of military and politics along with socioeconomic and cultural union, which leads to a larger process of creating a developed, new unified Korean community. This study will analyze the laws governing civil affairs in North Korea then compare it with the counterpart of South Korea to expand the opportunities to resolve diverse legal disputes within the rule of law principles that may arise in the process of unification. The findings will serve as the basic framework for the post-unification legal system. In the long term, it is to establish the necessary cornerstone to integrate the legal institutions regulating the civil affairs of both Koreas effectively and safely. First, the study will analyze civil laws of North Korea in the following areas; compensation, family, inheritance, and civil procedure. Furthermore, based on this analysis, we shall consider if the basis of legal cognition may be shared mutually by comparing and contrasting the contents of South Korean laws.
Abstract
The Korean peninsula was divided after the World War II into the Republic of Korea and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, then subsequently suffered the pains of the Korean War due to differences in ideologies. After this occurrence, both sides have established state union based on the differing ideologies, which led to the solidification of separation. So as to overcome conflicts, confrontations, fears of war, and agony of separated families during the last half-century, peaceful and democratic unification of the South and North Korea must be accomplished, which is the hope of all Koreans. After the separation, South and North Korea each has developed their own legal institutions from founding principles based on their ideologies. If the two Koreas are unable to overcome the differences, it will become a large obstacle to forthcoming unification. In order to resolve the problem, a clear and objective understanding on the laws of South and North Korea is essential, which means that we need to acknowledge the different realities in the unification process. Based on this foundation, we need to consider the process of integration of military and politics along with socioeconomic and cultural union, which leads to a larger process of creating a developed, new unified Korean community. This study will analyze the laws governing civil affairs in North Korea then compare it with the counterpart of South Korea to expand the opportunities to resolve diverse legal disputes within the rule of law principles that may arise in the process of unification. The findings will serve as the basic framework for the post-unification legal system. In the long term, it is to establish the necessary cornerstone to integrate the legal institutions regulating the civil affairs of both Koreas effectively and safely. First, the study will analyze civil laws of North Korea in the following areas; compensation, family, inheritance, and civil procedure. Furthermore, based on this analysis, we shall consider if the basis of legal cognition may be shared mutually by comparing and contrasting the contents of South Korean laws.
참고문헌 (64)
- "김일성 선집 제3권" (1963)
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙 제7판" (2002)
- 곽윤직, "채권총론 6판" (2003)
- 권용우, "북한민법연구" (2004)
- 김일성종합대학출판사, "민법 1" (1973)
- 김정금, "민사소송법 제2판" (1987)
- 법무부, "북한법의 체계적 고찰(1) -민사관계법-" (1992)
- 법원행정처, "북한의 민사법" (2007)
- 법원행정처, "북한사법제도개관" (1996)
- 법원행정처, "북한의 가족법" (1998)
- 법원행정처, "북한의 개정민사소송법" (1995)
- 법원행정처, "북한의 중재제도 –국가중재재판제도를 중심으로-" (1995)
- 법원행정처, "남북교류와 관련한 법적 문제점(3)" (2004)
- 법원행정처, "남북교류와 관련한 법적 문제점(4)" (2005)
- 법원행정처, "남북교류와 관련한 법적 문제점(6)" (2007)
- 법제처, "북한법제개요" (1991)
- 법제처, "북한법제개요 – 법제자료 제157집 -" (1991)
- 북한연구소, "북한의 민사소송법개요" (1991)
- 북한연구소, "북한의 재판제도" (1991)
- 사회과학원 법학연구소, "민사법사전" (1997)
- 손희두, "북한의 손해보상법에 관한 연구" (2006), 한국법제연구원
- 심형일, "주체의 법이론" (1987)
- 이계만, "북한의 신사법제도론" (1998)
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법 제6증보판" (2012)
- 이시윤, "신민사집행법 제5판" (2009)
- 정동윤, "민사소송법 제3판" (2009)
- 정경모, "북한법령집 제1권" (1990)
- 지원림, "민법강의 제5판" (2007)
- 최달곤, "북한민법의 연구" (1998)
- "법규해설: 민법(1)", 민주조선 (1991)
- "법규해설: 민법(2)", 민주조선 (1991)
- 강현중, "북한 민사소송법에 관한 소고", 민사소송, 4 (2001)
- 김상용, "북한의 제정 손해보상법의 내용검토와 평가", 북한법연구, (8) (2005)
- 김상용, "韓國, 中國 北韓民法의 基本原則과 主要內容의 比較", 법학연구, 13(2), pp.27~56 (2003), 법학연구원
- 김숙자, "북한의 가족법", 여성・가족생활연구, 8 (2004)
- 김영규, "최근 북한 민법의 변모와 그 특색 - 민법총칙과 채권법을 중심으로 -", 법학연구, (29), pp.159~180 (2008), 한국법학회
- 김영규, "최근 남북한 가족법의 변모와 그 접근가능성", 법학논총, 20, pp.21~55 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김영규, "중국과 북한 민법상의 상속제도", 유관순 연구, (10) (2006)
- 김영규, "중국과 북한 민법상의 불법행위책임", 진리논단, (13) (2006)
- 김진수, "중공민법의 연구", 법제, (34) (1986)
- 김홍규, "북한민사소송에 있어서 당과 인민의 역할에 관한 연구", 북한법률행정논총, 9 (1992)
- 김홍규, "북한민사소송법의 회고와 전망", 북한법률행정논총, 10 (1995)
- 김홍규, "북한의 민사소송법", 인권과 정의, (231) (1995)
- 류승훈, "북한에서의 민상사 관련 분쟁해결을 위한 법 시스템", 평화학연구, 11(1), pp.171~200 (2010), 사단법인 한국평화연구학회
- 박정원, "북한 민법의 발전 –특징・내용・평가", 북한연구학회보, 3(1) (1999)
- 신영호, "북한민법 40년과 그 동향", 북한법률행정논총, 8 (1990)
- 신영호, "북한가족법의 회고와 전망", 북한법률행정논총, 10 (1995)
- 신영호, "북한의 제정 상속법의 동향과 평가", 북한법연구, (8) (2005)
- 윤종철, "불법침해손해보상법률관계에서 유의할 몇가지 문제", 김일성종합대학 학보 – 역사법학, 51(1) (2005)
- 이규호, "북한민사소송법과 남한민사소송법안의 비교・분석", 연세법학연구, 7(1) (2000)
- 이춘성, "개정된 북한민사소송법의 분석평가", 법조, 44(2) (1995)
- 장명봉, "북한의 최근 법제정비의 동향과 평가", 북한법연구, (8) (2005)
- 정광수, "남・북한 가족법에 관한 비교 고찰", 사회과학연구, 43 (2004)
- 정동윤, "북한의 개정 민사소송법의 동향과 평가", 북한법연구, (8) (2005)
- 정동윤, "북한민사소송법의 특색과 소송절차의 개요", 북한법률행정논총, 9 (1992)
- 정동윤, "북한의 민사소송법", 북한법률행정논총, 7 (1989)
- 정동윤, "북한민사소송법의 주요내용과 특색", 북한법률행정논총, 8 (1990)
- 최달곤, "북한 민법의 회고와 전망", 북한법률행정논총, 10 (1995)
- 최달곤, "북한민법의 체계와 특색, In 북한법 체계와 특색" (1994)
- 최달곤, "북한가족법 40년과 그 동향", 북한법률행정논충, 8 (1990)
- 최달곤, "남북한민법의 비교연구", 북한법률행정논총, 7 (1989)
- 표호건, "현행 북한의 민사소송제도", 인권과 정의 (1996)
- 함영주, "북한 민사소송법과 중국 민사소송법의 상호관련성에 관한 고찰", 민사소송, 10(1), pp.177~204 (2006), 한국민사소송법학회
- "CNC 학술정보 북한법률 홈페이지"[URL]