본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Entry Invoking

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

We consider a vertically integrated incumbent and an entrant who is privately informed of his production cost and is going to enter the downstream industry. We introduce the concept of the entry invoking behavior of a potential entrant. By “entry invoking behavior,”we mean the entrant’s offer of a higher input price than his first best price under full information to convey the information that his entry benefits the incumbent as well. A high price signals a low cost of the entrant and accordingly a high profit of the integrated firm in a separating equilibrium. In a separating equilibrium, only the efficient (low-type) entrant enters the market, although some efficiency loss in signaling may be incurred. This signaling consideration casts a doubt on the efficiency of the retail-minus access price regulation. We also discuss the possibility of inefficient entry in a pooling equilibrium.

Abstract

We consider a vertically integrated incumbent and an entrant who is privately informed of his production cost and is going to enter the downstream industry. We introduce the concept of the entry invoking behavior of a potential entrant. By “entry invoking behavior,”we mean the entrant’s offer of a higher input price than his first best price under full information to convey the information that his entry benefits the incumbent as well. A high price signals a low cost of the entrant and accordingly a high profit of the integrated firm in a separating equilibrium. In a separating equilibrium, only the efficient (low-type) entrant enters the market, although some efficiency loss in signaling may be incurred. This signaling consideration casts a doubt on the efficiency of the retail-minus access price regulation. We also discuss the possibility of inefficient entry in a pooling equilibrium.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. Banerjee, A., "Voluntary Relationships among Mobile Network Operators and Mobile Virtual Network Operators: An Economic Explanation", Information Economics and Policy, 21, pp.72~84 (2009)
  2. Banks, J., "Equilibrium Selection in Signalling Games", Econometrica, 55(3), pp.647~661 (1987)
  3. Bork, R, "Antitrust Paradox" (1978), Basic Books
  4. Cho, I., "Signalling Games and Stable Equilibria", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, pp.179~222 (1987)
  5. Dewenter, R., "Access Pricing: Theory and Practice" (2006), Elsevier B. V
  6. Economides, N., "Access and Interconnection Pricing: How Efficient is the Efficient Component Pricing Rule?", The Antitrust Bulletin, 40, pp.557~579 (1995)
  7. Höffler, F., "Two Tales on Resale", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, pp.1448~1460 (2007)
  8. Laffont, J._J., "Access Pricing and Competition", European Economic Review, 38, pp.1673~1710 (1994)
  9. Rey, P., "Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3", pp.2145~2220 (2007), Elsevier
  10. Entry Regulation under Asymmetric Information about Demand: A Signaling Model Approach, "Sarmento, P", ~, pp.CETE Discussion Paper 304 (2003)
  11. Vareda, J, "Access Regulation under Asymmetric Information about the Entrant’s Efficiency", Information Economics and Policy, 22, pp.192~199 (2010)
  12. Vickers, J, "Competition and Regulation in Vertically Related Markets", Review of Economic Studies, 62, pp.1~17 (1995)
  13. White, L, "Foreclosure with Incomplete Information", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, pp.507~535 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)