디지털 이미지 분석을 이용한 지오텍스타일 공극 분포의 정량화
Quantitative Evaluation of Geotextile Void Structures Using Digital Image Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문에서는 지오텍스타일 공극 크기 분포를 이미지 분석방법을 이용하여 정량적으로 산출하였다. 연구과정은 실내시험을 통해 지오텍스타일-지오멤브레인 층으로 된 재료를 에폭시 레진으로 포화시킨 후, 양생, 절단하여 그 표면을 디지털 광학 현미경으로 관찰하고 정량화함으로 이루어졌다. 여기서는 재료공학에서 주로 사용하는 공간학(stereology)의 개념을 사용하였으며, 지오텍스타일 필라멘트에 의해 둘러싸인 공극의 크기를 최대내접공극크기분포(LIOS)로 표현하였다. 지오텍스타일 내부 축적빈도 50%에 해당하는 공극직경이 압축응력이 10kPa에서 300kPa로 증가함에 따라 45μm가량 감소하였으며, 다시 압축응력을 10kPa로 되돌렸을 경우 초기치의 90%정도 수준으로 회복하였다. 마찰형 지오멤브레인 표면에서 연직응력 100, 300 kPa을 받으며 전단되었을 경우 평균 공극의 크기가 각가 32, 16.5% 감소하였다. 본 논문의 시험 및 분석 결과는 지오텍스타일 내부의 최대내접공극 크기분포가 표면거칠기가 다른 지오멤브레인 표면에서 압축 및 인터페이스 전단됨에 따라 어떻게 변화하는지를 보여준다.
Abstract
This paper presents results from a study undertaken to quantitatively evaluate the geotextile pore sizes using optical image analysis. The evaluation was conducted by observing surfaces of coupons cut from resin-impregnated specimens of geotextile-geomembrane layered under various load conditions. Stereological concepts were applied to collect representative specimens from a series of laboratory tests. The sizes of voids enclosed by filaments were expressed in terms of the largest inscribing opening size (LIOS) distribution. The opening diameter corresponding to the 50% cumulative frequency decreased by about 45mm as the load increased from 10 to 300kPa and recovered to about 90% of its initial state on unloading back to 10kPa. The average void size was reduced by 32 and 16.5% as the geotextile was sheared against a textured geomembrane under normal stresses of 100 and 300kPa, respectively. The results showed how the LIOS distribution varied as a function of normal stress and interface shear displacement against a smooth and a textured geomembrane surfaces.
참고문헌 (30)
- "ASTM D 4751, Standard Test Method for Determining Apparent Opening Size of a Geotextile", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 6767, Standard Test Method for Pore Size Characteristics of Geotextiles by Capillary Flow Test", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 1505, Standard Test Method for Density of Plastics by the Density-Gradient Technique", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 1603, Standard Test Method for Carbon Black in Plastics", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 4491, Standard Test Methods for Water Permeability of Geotextiles by Permittivity", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 4632, Standard Test Method for Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 4751, Standard Test Method for Determining Apparent Opening Size of a Geotextile", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 4833, Standard Test Method for Index Puncture Resistance of Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Product", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 5199, Standard Test Method for Measuring the Nominal Thickness of Geosynthetics", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 5261, Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of Geotextiles", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 6693, Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Nonreinforced Polyethylene and Nonreinforced Flexible Polypropylene Geomembranes", ASTM International, ~
- "ASTM D 1004, Standard Test Method for Tear Resistance (Graves Tear) of Plastic Film and Sheeting", ASTM International, ~
- Bhatia, S. K., "Frequency Distribution of Void Ratio of Granular Materials Determined by an Image Analyzer", Soils and Foundations, 30(1), pp.1~16 (1990)
- Bhatia, S. K., "Geotextile Characterization and Pore Size Distribution: Part III. Comparison of Methods and Application to Design", Geosynthetics International, 3(3), pp.301~328 (1996)
- Dove, J. E., "A Method for Measuring Geomembrane Roughness", Geosynthetics International, 3, pp.369~392 (1996)
- Frost, J. D., "Automated Determination of the Distribution of Local Void Ratio from Digital Images", Geotechnical Testing Journal, 19(2), pp.107~117 (1996)
- Frost, J. D., "A Critical Assessment of the Moist-Tamping Technique", ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 26(1), pp.57~70 (2003)
- J. David Frost, "Microscale Geomembrane-Granular Material Interactions", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 16(1), pp.79~92 (2012), 대한토목학회
- Gokhale, A. M., "Efficient Measurement of Microstructural Surface Area Using Trisector", Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 25A, pp.919~928 (1994)
- Hebeler, G. H., "Quantifying Hook and Loop Interaction in Textured Geomembrane-Geotextile Systems", Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 23(1), pp.77~105 (2005)
- Ibrahim, A. A., "Microscopic Measurement of Sand Fabric from Cyclic Tests Causing Liquefaction", Geotechnical Testing Journal, 14(4), pp.371~382 (1991)
- Kim, D., "Multi-Scale Assessment of Geotextile-Geomembrane Interaction", Proc. of NAGS 2005, 2005, 8~
- Kim, D., "Multi-Scale Assessment of Geotextile- Geomembrane Interaction", 박사, pp.2006
- Koerner, R. M., "Designing With Geosynthetics", pp.761~ (1998), Prince Hall
- Lombard, G., "Theoretical and Experimental Opening Sizes of Heat-Bonded Geotextiles", Textile Research Journal, 59(4), pp.208~217 (1989)
- Rebenfeld, L., "Using Liquid Flow to Quantify the Pore Structure of Fibrous Materials", Journal of Textile Institute, 86(2), pp.241~251 (1995)
- Rigo, J. M., "Influence of Geotextile Structure on Pore Size Determination", ASTM Special Technical Publication, 12(4), pp.90~101 (1990)
- Underwood, E. E., "Stereology, or the quantitative evaluation of microstructure", Journal of Microscopy, 89, pp.161~180 (1969)
- Underwood, E. E., "Quantitative Stereology", pp.274~ (1970), Addison- Wesley Publishing Company
- Vaughan, N. P., "Observations of the microscopic structure of fibrous filters", Journal of Filtration and Separation, 33(8), pp.741~748 (1996)