본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Fundamental Studies Concerning Classical Chinese Literature and the Associated Compilation of Texts with Collected Commentaries during the Reign of Sejong

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

This study explores the level of sohak (minor learning) and philology, or fundamental studies, related to classical Chinese literature which was prevalent during the Sejong period, and examines how this level was reflected in the nature of annotated editions (of the Classics) and the way in which works became classified as Classics via the publication of collected commentaries. It also looks at the fact that the parallel structure was considered an important factor when compiling classical Chinese literature, which led to this parallel structure being adopted in Korean verses too. In terms of compilation methodology, the books published during Sejong’s reign were all based on a number of specific principles, but we can find a variety of different features in the compilation of the different books. This study closely examines such differences by investigating a number of methodologies used in compilation of the Seokbo sangjeol, the Worin cheongang ji gok, the Worin seokbo, Hunmi jeongeum haeryebon, Yongbi eocheon ga, and so many publications during the Sejong’s reign.

Abstract

This study explores the level of sohak (minor learning) and philology, or fundamental studies, related to classical Chinese literature which was prevalent during the Sejong period, and examines how this level was reflected in the nature of annotated editions (of the Classics) and the way in which works became classified as Classics via the publication of collected commentaries. It also looks at the fact that the parallel structure was considered an important factor when compiling classical Chinese literature, which led to this parallel structure being adopted in Korean verses too. In terms of compilation methodology, the books published during Sejong’s reign were all based on a number of specific principles, but we can find a variety of different features in the compilation of the different books. This study closely examines such differences by investigating a number of methodologies used in compilation of the Seokbo sangjeol, the Worin cheongang ji gok, the Worin seokbo, Hunmi jeongeum haeryebon, Yongbi eocheon ga, and so many publications during the Sejong’s reign.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 洪武正韻譯訓의 新硏究, "朴炳采", 高麗大學校 民族文化硏究所, ~ (1983)
  2. 千惠鳳, "日本蓬左文庫 韓國典籍" (2003), Jisik saneopsa
  3. 崔在穆, "林希逸三子鬳齋口義と東アジア三國の近世文化", pp.33~47 (2003)
  4. 姜信沆, "國語學史" (1988), 普成文化社
  5. 姜信沆, "國語國文學論叢: 二靜鄭然粲先生回甲紀念" (1989), Tap chulpansa
  6. 姜信沆, "韓國의 韻書. Vol. 2 of Gugeohak nonchong" (2000), Taehaksa
  7. 姜順愛, "새로 발견된 初塹本 월인석보 권25에 관한 연구", Seojihak yeongu, 16, pp.95~125 (1998)
  8. 김기종, "월인천강지곡의 저경과 문학적 성격 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2007
  9. 金己宗, "月印千江之曲의 底經과 문학적 성격" (2010), Bogosa
  10. 金學主, "조선시대 간행 중국문학 관계서 연구" (2002), National University Press
  11. 金武林, "洪武正韻譯訓硏究" (1999), Worin
  12. 金完鎭, "續添洪武正韻에 대하여", Jindan hakbo, 29, pp.30 (1966), 547~566
  13. 權在善, "世宗의 御製東國正韻과 申叔舟 등의 反切", Inmun gwahak yeongu, 3, pp.1~12 (1985)
  14. 한태동, "東國正韻 硏究", 延世論叢, 21(1), pp.279~320 (1985)
  15. 조선시대 국어학사 자료에 대한 기초연구, "장소원", ~ (2003)
  16. 정경일, "韓國 韻書의 理解" (2002), Akanet
  17. 鄭然粲, "洪武正韻譯訓의 硏究" (1972), Iljogak
  18. 조희무, "古今韻會擧要의 韻母硏究:陰聲·陽聲字母韻을 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, 11, pp.395~430 (1999)
  19. 조운성, "『동국정운』한자음의 성모와 운모 체계 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
  20. 長澤規矩也, "11和刻本漢籍文集 第11輯" (1979), 古典研究會
  21. 南廣祐, "東國正韻式 漢字音 聲調의 硏究", 論文集, 9(1), pp.9~34 (1964)
  22. 東國正韻式 漢字音 硏究, "南廣祐", 韓國硏究院, ~ (1966)
  23. 宁忌浮, "洪武正韻硏究" (2003), Shanghai cishu chubanshe
  24. 吳恒寧, "朝鮮世宗代資治通鑑思政殿訓義와 資治通鑑綱目思政殿訓義의 編纂", Taedong gojeon yeongu, 15, pp.27~58 (1998)
  25. 吳恒寧, "조선초기 성리학과 역사학" (2007), 高麗大學校民族文化硏究所
  26. 尾崎康, "斯道文庫論集(松本隆信教授退職記念論集)", pp.171~224 (1988), Shido bunko of Keio University
  27. 東國正韻과 洪武正韻譯訓音의 比較硏究, "成元慶", 建國大學校學術院, ~ (1971)
  28. 成元慶, "東國正韻 硏究", 學術誌, 15(1), pp.45~84 (1973)
  29. 沈慶昊, "국문학연구와 문헌학" (1999), Taehaksa
  30. 沈慶昊, "조선시대 한문학과 시경론" (1999), Iljisa
  31. 沈慶昊, "한국한문기초학사 제3책" (2012), Taehaksa
  32. 沈慶昊, "세종의 서재", pp.208~250 (2016), Seohae munjip
  33. 沈慶昊, "훈민정음 해례본의 한문문장 구조와 성조점에 따른 의미 해석에 대하여", Paper presented at National Hangeul Museum Hunmin jeongeum Conference (2016), National Hangeul Museum Auditorium
  34. 沈慶昊, "조선전기 문헌편찬 방법의 발달과 월인천강지곡", Paper presented at International conference on Celebrating Raising of the Status of the Worin cheongang ji gok to Korean National Treasure Number 320: Re-reading the Worin cheongang ji gok (2017)
  35. 沈慶昊, "安平" (2018), Alma
  36. 沈㬂俊, "日本訪書誌" (1988), The Academy of Korean Studies
  37. 王廸, "林希逸三子鬳齋口義と東アジア三國の近世文化", pp.81~102 (2003)
  38. 李東林, "洪武正韻譯訓과 四聲通解의 比較:四聲通考의 再構", 論文集, 5, pp.99~128 (1968)
  39. 李東林, "東國正韻 연구", 박사, pp.1970
  40. 芳村弘道, "文學研究法としての文獻學―朝鮮版の集部佚存書を中心としつつ―", Special Lecture at Korea University, ~ (2007)
  41. 芳村弘道, "vol. 12 of Gudian wenxian yanjiu", pp.220~241 (2009), Fenghuang chubanshe
  42. 兪昌均, "東國正韻硏究(硏究篇 復原篇)" (1966), Hyeongseol chulpansa
  43. 兪昌均, "古今韻會擧要의 反切과 東國正韻과의 比較", Dongyang munhwa, 8, pp.95~142 (1968)
  44. 周啓成, "林希逸三子鬳齋口義と東アジア三國の近世文化", pp.3~19 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)