국제적 강행법규에 대한 중재가능성
Arbitrability in Terms of Internationally Mandatory Provisions
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
International public policy recognizes internationally mandatory provisions that must be applied notwithstanding governing laws designated by Private International Law or the agreement entered into by the parties. The purpose of the international public policy is to secure public interests; thus, arbitral proceedings must also adhere to international public policy. However, unlike in the courts, which are official institutions, there are no specific methods to urge arbitral tribunals to apply internationally mandatory provisions. For example, if a party brings a suit in court for a claim relating to an internationally mandatory provision-despite an agreement to arbitrate-the court can review the validity of the arbitration provision as it applies to the internationally mandatory provisions. If the internationally mandatory provisions are not arbitrable, the arbitration provision will not apply, and the court may continue with its proceeding. However, if the arbitration provision does apply, the court must dismiss the suit to allow the parties to begin arbitration proceedings. Further, a court may refuse to recognize an arbitral award on the basis of it being against public policy if the arbitral tribunal failed to apply an arbitration provision deemed applicable to internationally mandatory provisions. This article discusses the arbitrability of internationally mandatory claims as it relates to the issues described above.
Abstract
International public policy recognizes internationally mandatory provisions that must be applied notwithstanding governing laws designated by Private International Law or the agreement entered into by the parties. The purpose of the international public policy is to secure public interests; thus, arbitral proceedings must also adhere to international public policy. However, unlike in the courts, which are official institutions, there are no specific methods to urge arbitral tribunals to apply internationally mandatory provisions. For example, if a party brings a suit in court for a claim relating to an internationally mandatory provision-despite an agreement to arbitrate-the court can review the validity of the arbitration provision as it applies to the internationally mandatory provisions. If the internationally mandatory provisions are not arbitrable, the arbitration provision will not apply, and the court may continue with its proceeding. However, if the arbitration provision does apply, the court must dismiss the suit to allow the parties to begin arbitration proceedings. Further, a court may refuse to recognize an arbitral award on the basis of it being against public policy if the arbitral tribunal failed to apply an arbitration provision deemed applicable to internationally mandatory provisions. This article discusses the arbitrability of internationally mandatory claims as it relates to the issues described above.
참고문헌 (24)
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제3권" (2004), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제4권" (2007), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제4권" (2007), 박영사
- 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2000), 박영사
- 목영준, "분쟁대상의 중재가능성", 민사재판의 제문제, 7 (1993), 사법발전재단
- 정찬모, "지적재산권분쟁의 중재가능성", 중재, (307) (2002), 대한상사중재협회
- 이헌묵, "국제거래에서 판매점계약(Distribution Agreement)의 판매자의 보상청구권에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 국제거래법연구, 19(2), pp.203~222 (2010), 국제거래법학회
- 손경한, "강행법규상 청구의 중재적격성(하)-미국의 경우를 중심으로", 중재, 10(6) (1986)
- 윤선희, "특허권 중재가능성에 관한 소고", 중재연구, 22(1), pp.111~130 (2012), 한국중재학회
- 윤남순, "유럽연합 대리상법", 상사법연구, 17(1) (1988), 한국상사법학회
- 정홍식, "국제중재에서 판매점의 보상청구권", 국제거래법연구, 22(1), pp.319~342 (2013), 국제거래법학회
- Horatia Muir Watt, "Party Autonomy in international contracts: from the makings of a myth to the requirements of global governance", ERCL, 3 (2010)
- Alan Redfern, "Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" (2004), Sweet and Maxwell
- "The Impact of Internationally Mandatory Laws on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements"[URL]
- Albert Jan van den Berg, "The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958-Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation" (1981), Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers
- Christopher S. Gibson, "Arbitration, Civilization and Public Policy: Seeking Counterpoise between Arbitral Autonomy and the Public Policy Defense in View of Foreign Mandatory Public Law", Penn. St. L. Rev, 113(4) (2009)
- Final Report on Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards, "Extending Ingmar to Jurisdiction and Arbitration Clauses: The End of Party Autonomy in Contracts with Commercial Agents?", European Review of Private Law, 6 (2007)
- Stuart Dutson, "The application of mandatory laws in England and Wales: Accentuate Limited v Asigra Inc", Int. A.L.R, 14(3) (2011)
- Christopher Chinn, "Arbitration of antitrust claims in the United States and Europe", Arbitration, 74(4) (2008)
- Alan Scott Rau, "The Arbitrator and Mandatory Rules of Law", Am. Rev. Int’l Arb, 18, pp.51~
- "Arbitrability: Are there limits?, LCIA Symposium, 4 October 2004, Montreal"[URL]
- Tai-Heng Cheng, "New Tools for an Old Quest", World Arb. & Mediation Rev, 121 (2009)
- Catherine A. Rogers, "The Arrival of the “HAVE-NOTS” in International Arbitration", Nevada Law Journal, 8 (2007)
- Patrick M. Baron, "A Second Look at Arbitrability", rbitration International Volume, 19(1) (2003)