본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지방재정분석의 순위결정요인 분석과 자치단체 유형화

Analyzing the Determinants of Governments' Ranking in the Local Fiscal Analysis and Categorizing Local Governments

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

This paper explores the determinants of ranking in the local fiscal analysis for Korean local governments using the data of 2006-2007. We empirically tests whether the rankings are systematically affected by exogenous factors, which are difficult for local governments' officials to improve in the shorn run. These include population, fiscal capacity, budget size, service area size, and so on. Using a stepwise regression, we select the determinants of the rankings and observe that they are different among the types of local governments, such as cities (Si), counties (Gun), and autonomous districts (Gu). With relatively low explanatory power of the regression results and the inconsistent selection of the variable by the model, we conclude that there are little evidence of a systematic relationship between rankings and exogenous factors. Even though there are few consistent factors to determine the ranking, we try to persuade that it is necessary to categorize local governments. The reasoning of categorization is to complement the omitted characteristics of local governments in comparison with others and to establish acceptable standards. Based on our empirical results and international experiences, we suggest yardsticks to categorize local governments.

Abstract

This paper explores the determinants of ranking in the local fiscal analysis for Korean local governments using the data of 2006-2007. We empirically tests whether the rankings are systematically affected by exogenous factors, which are difficult for local governments' officials to improve in the shorn run. These include population, fiscal capacity, budget size, service area size, and so on. Using a stepwise regression, we select the determinants of the rankings and observe that they are different among the types of local governments, such as cities (Si), counties (Gun), and autonomous districts (Gu). With relatively low explanatory power of the regression results and the inconsistent selection of the variable by the model, we conclude that there are little evidence of a systematic relationship between rankings and exogenous factors. Even though there are few consistent factors to determine the ranking, we try to persuade that it is necessary to categorize local governments. The reasoning of categorization is to complement the omitted characteristics of local governments in comparison with others and to establish acceptable standards. Based on our empirical results and international experiences, we suggest yardsticks to categorize local governments.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 박병희, "지방재정분석 종합점수와 재정지표 간 관계 분석", 한국지방재정논집, 12(3), pp.121~143 (2007), 한국지방재정학회
  2. 2002년도 지방재정분석․진단실시 및 제도개선, "한국지방행정연구원", 한국지방행정연구원, ~ (2003)
  3. FY2005 지방자치단체 재정분석 종합보고서, "한국지방행정연구원", 한국지방행정연구원, ~ (2006)
  4. FY2006 지방자치단체 재정분석 종합보고서, "한국지방행정연구원", 한국지방행정연구원, ~ (2007)
  5. 石井 幸樹, "地方公共団体の類型化を通じた 地方財政(平成19年度決算)の分析について", 地方財政 (2009)
  6. "Local Government Analysis System Capabilities"[URL]
  7. Does Form of Fiscal Governance Matter: Fiscal Practices and Outcomes in Chicago Suburbs, "Hendrick, Rebecca", Great Cities Institute, ~, pp.Great Cities Institute Working Paper, GC-07-01 (2007)
  8. ICMA, "Evaluating Financial Condition: A Handbook for Local Government, 4th edition", ~ (2003)
  9. Mattret, J.B., "L'analyse financière des communes" (1997), LGDJ
  10. Sohl, Shannon, "Measuring the Financial Position of Municipalities: Numbers Do Not Speak for Themselves" (2009), Public Budgeting & Finance

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)