본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Preliminary Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s Proposed IPR and Investment Chapters

존릴리
국제거래법학회 (Korea International Trade Law Association)|2012.12|국제거래법연구 (Korean Forum on International Trade and Business Law)|제21권 제2호|pp. 251-271

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

TPPTrans-Pacific PartnershipSurgical Method PatentsTherapeutic Judgment of DoctorsInvestment ChapterState Arbitration
주제분류법학

초록

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a proposed regional free trade agreement being negotiated between the United States, Vietnam, New Zealand, Peru,Singapore, Malaysia, Mexico, Chile, Canada, Brunei and Australia. The TPP is intended to be a “living agreement” in that it designed to allow other Pacific Rim countries to join over time. As such, the TPP’s significance among APEC countries and the United States will increase as more members are added to the TPP. Two of the TPP chapters related to intellectual property rights and investment have been leaked to the public and published by non-profit organizations and government officials. These sections raise significant issues regarding international trade policy, in particularly whether they adequately balance the interests of promoting private economic growth without undermining a nation’s ability to regulate public welfare, the environment, health care policy and other areas of public significance.

Abstract

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a proposed regional free trade agreement being negotiated between the United States, Vietnam, New Zealand, Peru,Singapore, Malaysia, Mexico, Chile, Canada, Brunei and Australia. The TPP is intended to be a “living agreement” in that it designed to allow other Pacific Rim countries to join over time. As such, the TPP’s significance among APEC countries and the United States will increase as more members are added to the TPP. Two of the TPP chapters related to intellectual property rights and investment have been leaked to the public and published by non-profit organizations and government officials. These sections raise significant issues regarding international trade policy, in particularly whether they adequately balance the interests of promoting private economic growth without undermining a nation’s ability to regulate public welfare, the environment, health care policy and other areas of public significance.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Issues for Congress, "Ferguson, Ian", Congressional Research Service, 3~4 (2012)
  2. "19 U.S.C. § 3802(b)(3)"[URL]
  3. "304 F.3d 1197 (11th Cir. 2002)", ~ (2002)
  4. "42 U.S.C. § 1396r-8(d)(4)(C)", ~
  5. "Bipartisan letter of agreement on trade" (2007)[URL]
  6. "PhRMA" (2010)[URL]
  7. "Comments from the Advanced Medical Technology Association" (2010)[URL]
  8. "Enhancing Trade and Investment, Supporting Jobs, Economic Growth and Development: Outlines of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement" (2011)[URL]
  10. "IPM"[URL]
  11. "Debunking the “Evergreening”Patents Myth, Harvard Law Record" (2010)[URL]
  12. "KORUS FTA art. 5.2 (b)(i)-(iii)", ~
  13. "KORUS FTA, Annex 11-B, ftn. 18"[URL]
  14. "KORUS FTA, art. 18.8.1", ~
  15. "KORUS FTA, art. 18.8.6(b)", ~
  16. "KORUS FTA, art. 18.9.1", ~
  17. "KORUS FTA, art. 18.9.5", ~
  18. "CAFTA Investor-State Ruling: Annex on Minimum Standard of Treatment, Proposed for TPP, Proves Insufficient as Tribunal Ignores Customary International Law Standard, Applies MST Definition from Past NAFTA Award to Rule against Guatemala, Public Citizen" (2012)[URL]
  19. "Public Interest Analysis of Leaked Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Investment Text, Public Citizen" (2012)[URL]
  20. "Meadows, at 1203", ~
  21. "Opinions on Ethics and Profession: Medical and Surgical Patents"[URL]
  22. "Railroad Development Corporation v. Republic of Guatemala, ICSID para. 203" (2012)[URL]
  23. "S.D. Myers, Inc. vs. Government of Canada, In a NAFTA Arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules" (2000)[URL]
  24. Thomas A Faunce, "Potential AUSFTA Trade Disputes over Off-Shore Constructions of Australian Pharmaceutical Policy, Brave New World of Health" (2008), The Federation Press
  25. "Trans-Pacific Partnership, Intellectual Property Rights Chapter Draft (February 10, 2011), Annex 12-B" (2011)[URL]
  26. "Trans-Pacific Partnership, Intellectual Property Rights Chapter Draft (February 10, 2011), art. 8.1" (2011)[URL]
  27. "Trans-Pacific Partnership, Intellectual Property Rights Chapter Draft (February 10, 2011), art. 8.2" (2011)[URL]
  28. "Trans-Pacific Partnership, Intellectual Property Rights Chapter Draft (February 10, 2011)" (2011)[URL]
  29. "Trans-Pacific Partnership, Investment Chapter Draft, art 12.2"[URL]
  30. "Trans-Pacific Partnership, Investment Chapter Draft"[URL]
  31. "Trans-Pacific Partnership, Investment Chapter Draft, Section B: Investor-State Dispute Settlement at ftn. 20"[URL]
  32. "TRIPS, art. 27", ~
  33. "TRIPS, art. 39.3", ~
  34. "USAFTA Annex 2-C, §1(d)", ~
  35. "US-Australia FTA, art. 17.9.1", ~

관련 논문AI추천

Responding to Public Concerns over Investor State Dispute Settlement Clauses In APEC Free Trade AgreementsLaura S. Henry아시아태평양법연구소 · Journal of Korean Law2013 · 제12권 제2호Will the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Integrate the Asia-Pacific Regional Market?이준엽, 정인교, 조정란한국비교경제학회 · 비교경제연구2014 · 제21권 제2호Trans-Pacific Partnership and China’s Handling Thereof나카지마 도모요시한국디지털무역연구소 · 디지털무역리뷰2016 · 제14권 제3호환태평양경제동반자협정(TPP)과 의약품 접근손경복, 이태진한국보건경제정책학회 · 보건경제와 정책연구2015 · 제21권 제3호The Untapped Potential of Investor-State Dispute Settlement involving Intellectual Property Rights and Expropriation in Free Trade AgreementsBryan MERCURIO법학연구소 · 법학논집2011 · 제15권 제3호환태평양 경제동반자 협정(TPP) 중 지적재산권 조항에 대한 고찰박준석법무부 · 국제법무연구2014 · 제120호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

CISG상의 손실경감의무에 관한 연구송양호pp. 1-22CISG에서의 의사표시의 해석김진우pp. 23-46유엔 物品賣買法(CISG)에서의 契約의 解釋최창렬pp. 47-71국제물품매매협약(CISG)에서 운송법적 쟁점에 대한 검토최세련pp. 73-97국제물품매매계약의 형식에 관한 법적문제 -UCC와 CISG 비교를 중심으로-하충룡pp. 99-119
원문 보기