본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

UNIDROIT의 ‘간접보유 유가증권 실체규범에 관한 협약’의 성립과 그 시사점

The UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities and Its Applicability to Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities(the ‘Convention’), also known as the ‘Geneva Securities Convention,’ was adopted on October 9, 2009. So far (December 2012), it has been signed by only one (Bangladesh) of the 40 negotiating States. The main purpose of the Convention is to offer harmonized transnational rules for the purpose of reducing the legal risks associated with the holding of securities through intermediaries. The Convention consists of 7 chapters as follows: Chapter I: Definition, sphere of application, Chapter II: Rights of account holder, Chapter III: Transfer of intermediated securities, Chapter IV: Integrity of the intermediated holding system, Chapter V: Special provisions in relation to collateral transactions, Chapter VI: Transitional Provisions, and Chapter VII: Final Provisions. On the national level, Korea has adopted the new system for electronic stock and debenture by the amendment to the Commercial Law (amended on April 2011,effective on April 2012). Korea has also adopted another electronic short-term debenture system through the Electronic Short-term Debenture Act established on July 14, 2011, effective on January 14, 2013. Accordingly, under the recent amendment and legislation of relevant Acts, stock and debenture can or will be issued and circulated not to the certification but with electronic registration. Such electronic stock and debenture systems mean the first step for uncertification of security and electronizing of the financial investments. However, there are some conflicts between the Convention and Korea’s related provisions under several Acts. Among the related Acts, the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act(‘FISCMA’) basically covers the matters of intermediated securities. With respect to effects of statement of account book, the Convention provides that Credit/Debit to a securities account is considered to acquire/dispose intermediated securities (Convention Article 9, 11, etc). However, Korea provides that statement to a securities account is considered to hold respective securities (FISCMA Article 311). With respect to protection to the innocent acquirer of securities, the Convention provides for the approval of innocent(good faith) acquisition by transfer of securities between accounts (Convention Article 18). However, Korea provides that innocent(good faith) acquisition by transfer of securities between accounts is not yet stipulated expressly. With respect to various ways of establishing a security right, the Convention provides that the way of transfer of securities between accounts or control agreement is also accepted (Convention Article 12). The control agreement is the one that pledgor grant ‘control’ (authority of management and disposition) of the account to secured party for the purpose of establishing a security right. However,Korea provides that the way of transfer of securities between accounts or control agreement is not accepted. For the present, a security right is established in the way of statement to be pledged in account books (FISCMA Article 311). It is noted, therefore, that the Convention is expected to be operated as Global Standard of clearing and depository legislation and commitment to the Convention implies for the law revisions on national level. In this regard, Korea should resolve any conflicts and problems on the national level between and among relevant laws regulating intermediated securities.

Abstract

The UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities(the ‘Convention’), also known as the ‘Geneva Securities Convention,’ was adopted on October 9, 2009. So far (December 2012), it has been signed by only one (Bangladesh) of the 40 negotiating States. The main purpose of the Convention is to offer harmonized transnational rules for the purpose of reducing the legal risks associated with the holding of securities through intermediaries. The Convention consists of 7 chapters as follows: Chapter I: Definition, sphere of application, Chapter II: Rights of account holder, Chapter III: Transfer of intermediated securities, Chapter IV: Integrity of the intermediated holding system, Chapter V: Special provisions in relation to collateral transactions, Chapter VI: Transitional Provisions, and Chapter VII: Final Provisions. On the national level, Korea has adopted the new system for electronic stock and debenture by the amendment to the Commercial Law (amended on April 2011,effective on April 2012). Korea has also adopted another electronic short-term debenture system through the Electronic Short-term Debenture Act established on July 14, 2011, effective on January 14, 2013. Accordingly, under the recent amendment and legislation of relevant Acts, stock and debenture can or will be issued and circulated not to the certification but with electronic registration. Such electronic stock and debenture systems mean the first step for uncertification of security and electronizing of the financial investments. However, there are some conflicts between the Convention and Korea’s related provisions under several Acts. Among the related Acts, the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act(‘FISCMA’) basically covers the matters of intermediated securities. With respect to effects of statement of account book, the Convention provides that Credit/Debit to a securities account is considered to acquire/dispose intermediated securities (Convention Article 9, 11, etc). However, Korea provides that statement to a securities account is considered to hold respective securities (FISCMA Article 311). With respect to protection to the innocent acquirer of securities, the Convention provides for the approval of innocent(good faith) acquisition by transfer of securities between accounts (Convention Article 18). However, Korea provides that innocent(good faith) acquisition by transfer of securities between accounts is not yet stipulated expressly. With respect to various ways of establishing a security right, the Convention provides that the way of transfer of securities between accounts or control agreement is also accepted (Convention Article 12). The control agreement is the one that pledgor grant ‘control’ (authority of management and disposition) of the account to secured party for the purpose of establishing a security right. However,Korea provides that the way of transfer of securities between accounts or control agreement is not accepted. For the present, a security right is established in the way of statement to be pledged in account books (FISCMA Article 311). It is noted, therefore, that the Convention is expected to be operated as Global Standard of clearing and depository legislation and commitment to the Convention implies for the law revisions on national level. In this regard, Korea should resolve any conflicts and problems on the national level between and among relevant laws regulating intermediated securities.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 금융위원회, "전자단기사채등의 발행 및 유통에 관한 법률안 국회의결", 금융위원회 보도참고자료, ~ (2011)
  2. 김동근, "전자등록제도의 법적 성질에 관한 연구", 민사법연구, 12(1) (2004)
  3. 김이수, "UNIDROIT 間接保有證券條約案과 電子證券 間接保有制度의 法的 課題", 선진상사법률연구, (45), pp.26~54 (2009), 법무부
  4. 박철영, "의결권 행사의 전자화와 Shadow Voting", 상사법연구, 29(4), pp.89~136 (2011), 한국상사법학회
  5. 박철영, "제네바증권협약의 제정과 국내 증권법의 과제", 증권법연구, 11(1), pp.305~354 (2010), 한국증권법학회
  6. Unidroit 간접보유증권 실체법 협약채택을 위한 외교회의 최종보고서, "박훤일", 정부자료, ~ (2009)
  7. Unidroit 간접보유증권에 관한 실체법 협약(“제네바증권협약”)의 채택을 위한 외교회 의 최종보고서, "사법협력관", 정부자료, ~ (2009)
  8. 안성포, "電子登錄制度의 導入을 위한 立法論的 考察-日本의 私債ㆍ株式등 代替法을 中心으로-", 중앙법학, 7(2), pp.223~256 (2005), 중앙법학회
  9. 유춘화, "제네바증권협약에 대한 입법적 고찰", 증권예탁, (73) (2010)
  10. 이성웅, "전자등록 단기사채의 법적 성질과 유통성", 경영법률, 21(2), pp.311~346 (2011), 한국경영법률학회
  11. 임중호, "증권대체거래에 있어서의 유가증권의 무권화 현상과 그 법적 문제", 비교사법, 5(1) (1998)
  12. UNIDROIT 간접보유증권협약에 대한 입법적 대응방안(최종 보고서), "정경영", 한국예탁결제원 연 구용역보고서, ~ (2008)
  13. 국증권법학회, "자본시장법(주석서Ⅱ)" (2009), 박영사
  14. 허항진, "금융중개기관을 통해 유가증권을 간접보유하는 투자자의 법적 지위", 상사법연구, 27(1), pp.185~233 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  15. 神田秀樹, "振替証券法制に関するユニドロア条約, In 東京大学法科大学院ローレビ役ーä第5巻" (2010)
  16. Christopher Bernasconi, "The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in Respect of Securities Held with an Intermediary", Uniform Law Review, 10 (2005)
  17. "Directive 2002", 47, pp.2002, ~
  18. Dorohtee Einsele, "Modernising German Law: Can the UNIDROIT Project on Interme diated Securities Provide Guidance?", Uniform Law Review, 10 (2005)
  19. France Drummond, "Intermediated securities: reflections on a new concept in French financial markets law", Law and Financial Markets Review (2007)
  20. Hideki Kanda, "Official Commentary on the UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities" (2012), Oxford University Press
  21. Roy Goode, "Explanatory Report on the 2006 Hague Securities Convention" (2005), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  22. "Background to the UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities"[URL]
  23. UNIDROIT, "Draft Official Commentary on the UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities (2009)", ~ (2009)
  24. UNIDROIT, "Draft Official Commentary on the UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities (2009)", ~ (2009)
  25. UNIDROIT, "Preliminary Draft Convention on Harmonized Substantive Rules Regarding Securities Held with an Intermediary-Explanatory Notes", ~ (2004)
  26. "Report of the Transparent Systems Working Group"[URL]
  27. UNIDROIT, "Report on the Second CGE session", Study LXXVⅢᐨDoc.43, ~ (2006)
  28. "Status of the UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities - Signatures, Ratifications, Acceptances, Approvals, Accessions"[URL]
  29. "UNIDROIT Convention on Substantive Rules for Intermediated Securities (Geneva, 2009)"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)