본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생태교육적 측면에서 초등과학 교과서 내 생태 관련 내용의 분석

An Analysis of Ecological Contents in Elementary Science Textbooks in Terms of Ecological Education

1

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

We assessed the contents in the elementary science textbooks with elements of ecological literacy composed of ecological knowledge, eco-centric attitude, and ecological sensitivity. The analysis of ecological knowledge in the textbooks was based on ‘The model for progression with ecological concepts (Barker & Slingsby, 1998)’. The result showed that ecological concepts such as ‘Biodiversity’ and ‘Adaptation to environment’, are emphasized and other two concepts such as ‘Evolution and population genetics’ and ‘Ecosystem’ were simply included. The concepts such as ‘Distribution of species in relation to abiotic factors’ and ‘Extinction’ were missing in the textbooks and ‘Terms such as angiosperm and monocot’ and ‘Pyramids of biomass and energy’ were presented earlier grade than in the model. A few low level concepts such as ‘Proper names’ and ‘Observing which species are present’ appeared repeatedly in the textbooks. The construction of ecological knowledge in science textbooks of elementary school may need to be improved based on the model. The activity contained contents related with ecological sensibility were 12.9% and this shows that there were not enough contents for ecological sensibility in science textbooks. Moreover, the activities related with eco- centric attitude were only 6.5%. Even though activities using living things were as many as 54.8%, the activities of low level such as ‘Observing which species are present’ were simply repeated. The activities of ‘Identification’ and󰡐Use the keys󰡑did not use living organisms. These results suggest that the activities in the science textbooks of elementary school may not be sufficient for promoting ecological literacy of children.

Abstract

We assessed the contents in the elementary science textbooks with elements of ecological literacy composed of ecological knowledge, eco-centric attitude, and ecological sensitivity. The analysis of ecological knowledge in the textbooks was based on ‘The model for progression with ecological concepts (Barker & Slingsby, 1998)’. The result showed that ecological concepts such as ‘Biodiversity’ and ‘Adaptation to environment’, are emphasized and other two concepts such as ‘Evolution and population genetics’ and ‘Ecosystem’ were simply included. The concepts such as ‘Distribution of species in relation to abiotic factors’ and ‘Extinction’ were missing in the textbooks and ‘Terms such as angiosperm and monocot’ and ‘Pyramids of biomass and energy’ were presented earlier grade than in the model. A few low level concepts such as ‘Proper names’ and ‘Observing which species are present’ appeared repeatedly in the textbooks. The construction of ecological knowledge in science textbooks of elementary school may need to be improved based on the model. The activity contained contents related with ecological sensibility were 12.9% and this shows that there were not enough contents for ecological sensibility in science textbooks. Moreover, the activities related with eco- centric attitude were only 6.5%. Even though activities using living things were as many as 54.8%, the activities of low level such as ‘Observing which species are present’ were simply repeated. The activities of ‘Identification’ and󰡐Use the keys󰡑did not use living organisms. These results suggest that the activities in the science textbooks of elementary school may not be sufficient for promoting ecological literacy of children.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 제7차 초등학교 교육과정, "교육부", ~ (1997)
  2. 김재영, "국민학교 학생의 생물에 대한 흥미도-생물영역을 중심으로-", 한국생물교육학회지, 22(1), pp.77~82 (1994)
  3. 박지영, "고등학생의 생태계에 대한 오개념 유형", 한국생물교육학회지, 31(3), pp.203~213 (2003), 한국생물교육학회
  4. 박진희, "생태학적 지식과 관련된 우리나라 환경교육의 실태 분석", 환경교육학회지, 13(2), pp.65~74 (2000)
  5. 서우석, "제7차 초등학교 교육과정에 반영된 환경교육 내용 분석", 인간환경학회지, 3(1), pp.17~29 (2000)
  6. 심규철, "제 7차 교육과정 7학년 과학 교과 생명 영역의 탐구 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), pp.550~559 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  7. 유명순, "생태계에 대한 초등 학생들의 개념 연구", 한국생물교육학회지, 24(2), pp.127~138 (1996)
  8. 정완호, "초등학교 자연과에서의 야외 수업 실태와 개선 방안 및 지도 방략", 한국초등과학교육학회지, 15(1), pp.151~165 (1996)
  9. 정현원, "감성 평가를 위한 감성의 의미 재정립과 어휘 체계에 관한 연구", 대한인간공학회지, 26(3), pp.17~25 (2007), 대한인간공학회
  10. 조용개, "생태중심주의 환경윤리의 철학적 함의와 교육적 대안", 환경철학, 5(5), pp.33~60 (2006), 한국환경철학회
  11. 진옥화, "환경소양 개념의 변천과 환경소양 측정연구", 석사, pp.2004
  12. 최영분, "제7차 초등학교 교육과정 교과서의 환경 관련 내용 분석", 환경교육, 15(1), pp.115~124 (2002), 한국환경교육학회
  13. Barker, S., "From nature table to niche: curriculum progression in ecological concept", International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), pp.479~486 (1998)
  14. Berkowitz, A. R., "A framework for integrating ecological literacy, civics literacy and environmental citizenship in environmental education Environmental Education and Advocacy: Perspectives of Ecology and Education" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  15. Capra,F., "The Web of Life" (1996), Harper Collins
  16. "The new facts of life: Connecting the dots on food, health and the environment. Centre for Ecoliteracy"[URL]
  17. Chawla,L., "Significant life experiences revisited: a review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity", Environmental Education Research, 4, pp.369~382 (1998)
  18. Cherif,A.H., "Barriers to ecology education in North American high schools: Another alternative perspective", Journal of Environmental Education, 23(3), pp.36~46 (1992)
  19. Cherrett,J.M., "Ecological Concepts: the Contribution of Ecology to an Understanding of the Natural World" (1989), Blackwell Scientific
  20. Chu, H., "Korean Year 3 Children's Environmental Literacy: A prerequisite for a Korean environmental education curriculum", International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), pp.731~746 (2007)
  21. Cutter-MacKenzie, A., "Ecological literacy: The 'missing paradigm' in environmental education(part one)", Environmental Education Research, 9(4), pp.497~523 (2003)
  22. Hart,P., "Environment in the science curriculum: The politics of change in the Pan-Canadian science curriculum development process", International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), pp.1239~1254 (2002)
  23. Leeming, F. C., "Effects of participation in class activities on children's environmental attitudes and knowledge", The Journal of Environmental Education, 28, pp.33~42 (1997)
  24. Lindemann-Matties, "Investigating nature on the way to school: Responses to an educational programme by teachers and their pupils", International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), pp.895~918 (2006)
  25. Magntorm, O., "Reading natureexperienced teachers' reflections on a teaching sequence in ecology: implications for future teacher training", NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 2(5), pp.67~81 (2006)
  26. Magntorm, O., "Reading nature from a 'bottom-up' perspective", Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), pp.68~75 (2007)
  27. Orr,D., "Ecological Litera" (1992), State University of New York Press
  28. Palmer,J., "Development of concern for the environmental and formative experiences of educators", The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), pp.26~30 (1993)
  29. Simonnet,D., "L'Ecologisme, Presses Univ. de France 생태학: 인간회복을 위하여" (1979), 한마당
  30. Slingsby, D., "Making connections: biology, environmental education and education for sustainable development", Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), pp.4~6 (2003)
  31. Smith, G. A., "Ecological education: Extending the definition of environmental education", Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 15(16), pp.139~146 (1999)
  32. Tanner,T., "Significance life experiences: A new research area in environmental education", Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), pp.20~24 (1980)
  33. Vadala, C. E., "Childhood play and environmental interests: Panacea or Snake oil?", Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), pp.3~18 (2007)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)