한국과 미국 과학 교과서의 진화 내용 요소와 설명 방식에 대한 비교
Comparative Study on the Content Elements and Explanation Way of Evolution Presented in Science Textbooks of Korea and the US
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Evolution is a core theory which can explain the diversity of living organisms. The purpose of this study was to determine implications on the evolution education by comparing and analyzing various subjects and content elements presented in the chapter which deals with evolution in middle school science textbooks of Korea and the US. The analysis framework consisting of a total of 8main themes and 32 sub-themes was used for the content classification of evolution. The contents consist of the evidences for evolution and the evolution process in common, but the textbook in the US also includes themes such as geological time, speciation, coevolution, origin of life and evolution of human being. The textbook in Korea includes some scientific errors such as Lamarckism, the developmental similarity in the embryo of vertebrate that need to be improved. And it is necessary to emphasize the importance of heritable variation in the theory of natural selection. Meanwhile, the textbook in the US gives major coverage to the subject of natural selection and presents various specific examples of natural selection. Efforts for developing various inquiry activities in evolution need to be improved in both textbooks. It is necessary to place emphasis on collection and retention of reliable evidences for evolution. And it is also essential to extend the contents including the origin of human being and geological time gradually when establishing the educational direction of evolution in Korea. The measures for raising the teacher's belief through the improvement of awareness regarding the mechanism and roles of evolution are also required.
참고문헌 (37)
- Project 2061: Biological and Health Science, "AAAS", American Association for the Advancement of Science, ~ (1989)
- Brumby, M., "Problems in learning the concept of natural selection", Journal of Biological Education, 13(2), pp.119~122 (1979)
- Cleaves, A., "In the shadow of intelligent design : The teaching of evolution", Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), pp.30~35 (2008)
- Clough, M. P., "Diminish students’ resistance to biological evolution", The American Biology Teacher, 56(7), pp.409~415 (1994)
- Deadman, J. A., "What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics?", Journal of Biological Education, 12(1), pp.7~15 (1978)
- Dobzhansky, T., "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution", The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), pp.125~129 (1973)
- Douglas, J. F., "Evolution" (2009), Sinauer Associates Inc
- Elgin, P. G., "Creationism vs. Evolution; A study of the opinions of Georgia teachers", 박사, pp.1983
- 하민수, "생물 전공자와 비전공자의 진화에 관한 개념, 흥미, 수용 및 종교성에 관한 연구", 생물교육, 38(3), pp.467~475 (2010), 한국생물교육학회
- Hokayem, H., "College students’ perception of the theory of evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), pp.395~419 (2008)
- Jerry A. A. C., "Why Evolution is True" (2009), Penguin books
- Katy, Z. A., "Holt Science and Technology Life Science" (2007), Holt, Rinehart and Winstone
- 김학현, "고등학교 생물교과서에서 진화가 차지하는 비중", 생물교육, 30(2), pp.158~165 (2002), 한국생물교육학회
- 김학현, "고등학교 생물 교과서에서의 진화내용분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.470~483 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- Kwon, H., "Analysis of the middle science teachers’ and students’ views of living things", The Korean Journal of Biology Education, 29(2), pp.113~127 (2001)
- 이춘승, "중고등학생들의 진화에 관한 오개념 유형과 유형별 원인 분석", 생물교육, 35(4), pp.611~621 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
- 이미숙, "남북한 고등학교 생물 교과서 진화 영역 내용 비교", 생물교육, 35(1), pp.134~149 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
- 이미숙, "진화 및 진화 수업에 대한 현직 교사 및 예비 교사들의 인식 조사", 생물교육, 36(4), pp.587~599 (2008), 한국생물교육학회
- Lee, M., (2013), Chunjae Kyoyuk
- 이순남, "생물학에서 진화론의 역할에 관한 현직 과학 교사들의 인식", 생물교육, 39(2), pp.181~195 (2011), 한국생물교육학회
- 이양락, "제7차 초등학교 과학과 교육과정 내용의 적정성 분석 및 평가", 초등과학교육, 24(3), pp.214~225 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Moore, R., "The revival of creationism in the United States", Journal of Biological Educations, 35, pp.17~21 (2000)
- Moore, R., "The differing perceptions of teachers & students regarding teachers’ emphasis on evolution in high school biology classrooms", The American Biology Teacher, 69(5), pp.268~271 (2007)
- National Research Council, "National Science Education Standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- 백성혜, "초등학생과 초등 교사의 인식을 통한 과학교육과정에서 추구하는 목표 성취 정도 분석", 초등과학교육, 30(1), pp.113~128 (2011), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 박종분, "자연선택개념의 이해를 위한 활동중심수업의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.505~516 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- Rutherford, F. J., "Science for All Americans" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Rutledge, M. L., "Evolutionary theory, the nature of science & high school biology teachers : Critical relationships", The American Biology Teacher, 62(1), pp.23~31 (2000)
- Senter, P., "Scapular orientation in theropods and basal birds and the origin of flapping flight", Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 51(2), pp.305~313 (2006)
- Settlage, J. J., "Conceptions of natural selection : A snapshot of the sense-making process", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), pp.449~457 (1994)
- Shin, Y., (2013), Chunjae Kyokwaseo
- Smith, M. U., "Foundational issues in evolution education", Science and Education, 4(1), pp.23~46 (1995)
- Sober, E., "Philosophy of Biology" (1993), Oxford University Press
- 서예원, "한국과 미국의 초등학교 과학 교과서 비교 연구: 3학년 물질 영역의 과학적 개념 및 탐구 과정을 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.509~524 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Swarts, F. A., "Topic and inquiry analysis of secondary school biology textbooks of the People’s Republic of China, the United States of America, and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics", 박사, pp.1991
- Swarts, F. A., "Evolution in secondary school biology textbooks of the PRC, the USA, and the latter stages of the USSR", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), pp.475~505 (1994)
- Xu, X., "An Archaeopteryxlike theropod from China and the origin of Avialae", Nature, 475, pp.465~470 (2011)