‘의식의 흐름’과 ‘자동기술법’ 사이
Between the ‘flow of consciousness’ and the ‘Automatism’ - On the nature of the avant-garde in Lee Sang literature
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The ‘flow of consciousness’ and ‘Automatism’, which have been mixed to date in an attempt to evaluate the nature of the avant-garde in Lee Sang(李箱, 1910-1937) literature, are actually contradictory concepts. If the ‘flow of consciousness’ is a continuous flow of a series of impressions that emerge in the mind of the subject, the ‘Automatism’ excludes the influence of consciousness and renders the spontaneous movement of the unconscious as artistic expression. The purpose of this paper is to identify the concept of unconsciousness that exists in the point of contact of two other surrealistic movement and to ascertain what kind of artistic orientation Lee Sang has in the meantime. First, as discussed in Chapter 2, the “flow of consciousness” proposed by William James was a psychological term for the continuous flow of consciousness when it was first introduced in Japan. However, in the process of incorporating James Joyce into the movement of ‘New Psychologism’ by Ito Sei(伊藤整, 1905-1969) in Japan, this ‘flow of consciousness’ has been transformed into the concept of positively referring to the movement of ‘unconsciousness’ in Freudian sense. In other words, James Joyce’s psychologism was not merely conveying the inner impression, but manifesting unconscious impressions on the psychology. What Lee Sang literature was referred to as ‘the flow of consciousness’ results from the existence of this ‘New Psychologism’ tendency in Tokyo. There is a background here in which Kim Moonjip(金文輯) pejoratively reduced Lee ‘s literature to the reappearance of the literary circles of Tokyo ‘New Psychologism’ or ‘Dadaism’. He attacked the ambiguous attitude of Choi Jaeseo(崔載瑞) and tried to define his technique of creation somewhere between ‘flow of consciousness’ and ‘automatism’. This is clearly distinguished from Lee siwoo(李時雨)’s attitude who concluded that Lee Sang did not reach the scope of the ‘Automatism’ of the 20th century. In other words, Lee Sang was an artist who was constantly moving between the overlaps of contemporary artistic trends.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김주현, "이상", ~
- "伊藤整全集", 新潮社, ~ (1973)
- 고명수, "한국에 있어서의 초현실주의 문학 고찰", 한국어문학연구, 22, pp.247~298 (1987), 동악어문학회
- 구연식, "한국 다다이즘의 비교문학적 연구-이상시를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1974
- 문광영, "韓國 쉬르리얼리즘시의 表現技法論에 관한 小考", 論文集, 인천교육대학교, pp.153~180 (1985)
- 朴根瑛, "韓國超現實主義詩의 比較文學的 硏究", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1989
- 서복희, "리비도 충동의 역동성 -초현실주의, 이상의 소설 <지주회시>-", 한중인문학연구, (26), pp.121~140 (2009), 한중인문학회
- 송재영, "李箱詩와 쉬르레알리슴", 성곡논총, 12, pp.266~299 (1981), 성곡언론문화재단
- 이병수, "이상시의 외래어와 한글 혼용이 보여주는 자동기술법 비교 연구", 비교문화연구, 39, pp.219~240 (2015), 경희대학교 비교문화연구소
- 이철호, "한국 근대소설과 ‘의식의 흐름’-베르그송, 제임스, 아인슈타인을 중심으로", 상허학보, 36, pp.219~254 (2012), 상허학회[DOI]
- 조동민, "Cubism을 통해서 본 한국의 해체시-이상의 다다적 요소의 근원을 밝히면서", pp.1969
- 발터 벤야민, "발터 벤야민 선집 5" (2008), 길
- 윌리엄 제임스, "심리학원리 1" (2014), 아카넷
- 앙드레 브르통, "초현실주의 선언" (2015), 미메시스
- 波田野節子, "무정을 읽는다" (2008), 소명출판
- 蘭明, "李箱적 越境과 詩의 生成 : 詩と詩論 수용 및 그 주변" (2010), 역락
- 蘭明, "李箱と昭和帝國" (2012), 思潮社
- 川口喬一, "昭和初年のユリシーズ" (2005), みすず書房
- 하야시 카즈히토(林和仁), "伊藤整と意識の流れ", 神戸女学院大学論集, 32(2) (1985), 神戸女学院大学研究所
