과학 현장 학습이 초등학교 영재 학생들의 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 영향
Effects of Science Field Trip on Gifted Elementary School Students' Science-related Attitudes
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed the effects of science field trip on elementary school gifted students’ science-related attitudes. Samples of the study were composed of 162 gifted students attending the Science Gifted Education Center of S National University of Education in Seoul, Korea. The science field trip was conducted for three days at six locations in Jecheon City and Taebaek City. To quantitatively analyze the scores of science-related attitudes of the gifted students participating in field trip, a retrospective pre-post test with modified format of ‘TOSRA (Test of science-related attitudes)’ was administrated after completion of the field trip. To find out more detailed characteristics, qualitative data such as daily records of field trip and interview were also gathered and analyzed. The major results of the study are as follows: First, in the paired t-test for data of science-related attitudes, a statistically significant difference between the pre and post was found (t=—9.9654, df=161, p<.001). In addition, there were statistically significant differences among the seven sub-factors, especially in the ‘Adoption of Scientific Attitudes’ factor. As a result of the interview, it was revealed that the activities of peer discussion at the accommodation and the activities of verifying the knowledge gained from the book or the lesson in the natural field greatly influenced the increase of ‘adoption of scientific attitudes’ of the students. Second, in ANCOVA with the pre-test scores as the covariate, there was no statistically significant difference in science- related attitudes according to gender [F(1, 159)=3.293, (p> .05)]. But, female students felt more pleasure in science lessons after science field trip than male students [F(1, 159)= 9.2733, (p<.01)]. And, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of science-related attitudes according to the preferred science subjects (physics, chemistry, biology, earth science) [F(3, 157)=0.412, (p>.05)]. But, the gifted students who prefer earth science subject have more interest in science as a leisure after science field trip than those who prefer physical subject [F(3, 157)=4.098, (p<.01)]. However, there were statistically significant differences in the scores of science-related attitudes according to the preferred teaching method(knowledge acquisition class through books and lectures, science lab experiment class, and natural field inquiry class) [F(2, 158)=6.3707, (p<.01)]. The gifted students who prefer natural field inquiry class showed higher scores on science-related attitudes after science field trip than those who prefer to acquire knowledge through books and lectures. Especially, the scores in four sub factors (Adoption of Scientific Attitudes, Attitude of Scientific Inquiry, Enjoyment of Science Lessons, Leisure Interest in Science) were significantly increased [F(2, 158)=3.3179, (p<.05)], [F(2, 158)=4.6490, (p<.05)], [F(2, 158)=5.2376, (p<.01)], [F(2, 158) =4.4037, (p<.05), respectively]. Based on these findings, implications for research on the gifted education and gifted students' teaching and learning are discussed.
Abstract
This study analyzed the effects of science field trip on elementary school gifted students’ science-related attitudes. Samples of the study were composed of 162 gifted students attending the Science Gifted Education Center of S National University of Education in Seoul, Korea. The science field trip was conducted for three days at six locations in Jecheon City and Taebaek City. To quantitatively analyze the scores of science-related attitudes of the gifted students participating in field trip, a retrospective pre-post test with modified format of ‘TOSRA (Test of science-related attitudes)’ was administrated after completion of the field trip. To find out more detailed characteristics, qualitative data such as daily records of field trip and interview were also gathered and analyzed. The major results of the study are as follows: First, in the paired t-test for data of science-related attitudes, a statistically significant difference between the pre and post was found (t=—9.9654, df=161, p<.001). In addition, there were statistically significant differences among the seven sub-factors, especially in the ‘Adoption of Scientific Attitudes’ factor. As a result of the interview, it was revealed that the activities of peer discussion at the accommodation and the activities of verifying the knowledge gained from the book or the lesson in the natural field greatly influenced the increase of ‘adoption of scientific attitudes’ of the students. Second, in ANCOVA with the pre-test scores as the covariate, there was no statistically significant difference in science- related attitudes according to gender [F(1, 159)=3.293, (p> .05)]. But, female students felt more pleasure in science lessons after science field trip than male students [F(1, 159)= 9.2733, (p<.01)]. And, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of science-related attitudes according to the preferred science subjects (physics, chemistry, biology, earth science) [F(3, 157)=0.412, (p>.05)]. But, the gifted students who prefer earth science subject have more interest in science as a leisure after science field trip than those who prefer physical subject [F(3, 157)=4.098, (p<.01)]. However, there were statistically significant differences in the scores of science-related attitudes according to the preferred teaching method(knowledge acquisition class through books and lectures, science lab experiment class, and natural field inquiry class) [F(2, 158)=6.3707, (p<.01)]. The gifted students who prefer natural field inquiry class showed higher scores on science-related attitudes after science field trip than those who prefer to acquire knowledge through books and lectures. Especially, the scores in four sub factors (Adoption of Scientific Attitudes, Attitude of Scientific Inquiry, Enjoyment of Science Lessons, Leisure Interest in Science) were significantly increased [F(2, 158)=3.3179, (p<.05)], [F(2, 158)=4.6490, (p<.05)], [F(2, 158)=5.2376, (p<.01)], [F(2, 158) =4.4037, (p<.05), respectively]. Based on these findings, implications for research on the gifted education and gifted students' teaching and learning are discussed.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강선탁, "과학캠프 활동이 초⋅중학생들의 과학에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향 - 제주해변과학캠프를 중심으로 -", 교육연구, 51, pp.155~180 (2011), 교육문제연구소
- 제 3차 영재교육진흥종합계획, "교육부", 교육부, ~ (2013)
- 과학과 교육과정, "교육부", 교육부, ~ (2015)
- 초등과학 영재교육의 방향과 과제, "초등과학교육", 2005, 192~201, pp.한국초등과학교육학회
- 권치순, "초등과학 영재 캠프 프로그램의 개발 및 적용", 초등과학교육, 25(5), pp.522~531 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김성춘, "과학영재교육원에 대한 학생과 학부모의 인식 및 요구도 조사 연구- 강릉원주대학교 과학영재교육원을 중심으로 -", 과학영재교육, 1(2), pp.17~32 (2009), 한국과학영재교육학회
- 김은숙, "이공계와 의약계 진로 희망 초등학생의 진로 선택 이유, 과학과목과 수학과목 선호도, 과학에 대한 흥미, 과학적 포부 비교", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(8), pp.779~786 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김은진, "제 7차 교육과정기의 초등과학교과 현장 학습 실태 조사", 초등과학교육, 22(2), pp.173~180 (2003), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김은진, "생물야외탐구학습에서 초등 예비교사의 야외활동에 대한 태도 변화", 생물교육, 33(3), pp.327~337 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
- 김찬종, "과학교육학개론" (1999), 북스힐
- 김창건, "과학캠프 참여학생들의 과학적 태도 및 과학에 대한 인식 분석", 교육과학연구, 12(1), pp.167~188 (2010)
- 류지영, "효과적인 초등학교 영재교육을 위한 심화학습 프로그램의 개선에 관한 연구", 교육과정연구, 21(3), pp.10~452 (2003), 한국교육과정학회
- 박형민, "뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 과학 야외학습이 초등학생들의 흥미와 성취도에 미치는 영향", 초등과학교육, 34(2), pp.252~263 (2015), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 송진웅, "2015 과학과 교육과정 개정의 주요 방향 및 쟁점 그리고 과학교실문화", 현장과학교육, 9(2), pp.72~84 (2015), 한국현장과학교육학회
- 신명렬, "과학캠프 운영이 초등과학영재의 과학탐구능력 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 효과", 영재교육연구, 22(4), pp.967~983 (2012), 한국영재학회
- 심규철, "중학교 과학 영재의 과학에 대한 흥미 연구 2-재능 영역에 따른 비교", 한국과학교육학회지, 21(1), pp.135~148 (2001)
- 심명보, "초등 수․과학 영재 및 일반 학생의 성격유형에 따른 교수방법 선호도 비교", 특수․영재교육저널, 2, pp.43~65 (2015)
- 이미경, "과학에 대한 태도와 과학 성취도의 관계", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), pp.399~407 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 이숙영, "다문화 과학인재와 과학영재의 학습 경향성 및 사회적 특성과 과학캠프 참여 태도 비교", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 5(3), pp.235~244 (2012), 대한지구과학교육학회
- 임채성, "뇌 기능에 기초한 과학 교수학습 : 뇌기능과 학교 과학의 정의적, 심채적, 인지적 영역의 연계적 통합 모형", 초등과학교육, 24(1), pp.86~101 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 임채성, "생물 야외 탐구 학습에서 초등 예비교사의 교수 효능감 변화에 대한 탐색적 연구", 생물교육, 33(2), pp.133~143 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
- 임채성, "과학학습의 정의적 영역에서 사전-사후 통합 검사 설계의 타당화 연구: 과학영재를 대상으로", 초등과학교육, 36(3), pp.219~226 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- 정완호, "초등학교 자연과에서의 야외 수업 실태와 개선 방안 및 지도 방략", 초등과학교육, 15(1), pp.151~165 (1996)
- 한국교육개발원, "2014 영재교육 통계연보" (2015), 한국교육개발원
- Abraham, N., "High school biology field expeditions", The American Biology Teacher, 28(5), pp.381~387 (1966)
- Barton, A. C., "Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls", American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), pp.68~103 (2008)
- Benz, G., "An experimental evaluation of field trips for achieving informational gains in a unit on earth science in four ninth grade classes", Science Education, 46(1), pp.43~49 (1962)
- Carin, A. A., "Teaching Science Through discovery" (1985), Merrill
- Chinn, C. A., "Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks", Science Education, 86(2), pp.175~218 (2002)
- Cornell, J., "Sharing Nature with Children" (2009), Dawn Publications
- Creswell, J. W., "Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research", pp.209~240 (2003)
- Davis, G. A., "Using a retrospective pre-post questionnaire to determine program impact", Journal of Extension, 41(4), pp.1~5 (2003)
- Fraser, B. J., "TOSRA: Test of Science-related Attitudes" (1981), Australian Council for Educational Research
- Gutiérrez, K. D., "Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices", Theory into Practice, 38(2), pp.87~93 (1999)
- Jones, M. G., "Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists", Science Education, 84(2), pp.180~192 (2000)
- Kahle, J. B., "Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning", pp.542~557 (1994)
- Kovalik, S. J., "Kid's eye view of science: A teacher's handbook for implementing an integrated thematic approach to teaching science, K-6" (1994), Center for the Future of Public Education
- Moomaw, S., "Teaching STEM in the Early Years: Activities for Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics" (2013), Redleaf Press
- Moll, L. C., "Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms", Theory into Practice, 31(2), pp.132~141 (1992)
- National Research Council, "Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning" (2000), National Academies Press
- Perelman, L. J., "School's out: Hyperlearning, the New Technology, and the End of Education" (1992), William Morrow and Company
- Pratt, C. C., "Measuring program outcomes: Using retrospective pretest methodology", American Journal of Evaluation, 21(3), pp.341~349 (2000)
- Renzulli, J. S., "The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented", Gifted Child Quarterly, 20(3), pp.303~306 (1976)
- Robinson, A., "Best Practices in Gifted Education: An Evidence-based Guide" (2006), Prufrock Press
- Sadler, T. D., "Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), pp.235~256 (2010)
- Torrance, E. P., "The Search of Satori & Creativity" (1979), Creative Education Foundation
- Whyte, J., "Girls into Science and Technology: The Story of a Project" (2017), Taylor & Francis
