본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

예비 생물교사의 진화 개념에 대한 이해와 수업 내용 분석

Analysis on Understanding and Class Contents of Evolution of Pre-service Biology Teachers

정은영|윤영민
한국생물교육학회 (The Korean Society of Biology Education)|2019.12|생물교육 (BIOLOGY EDUCATION)|제47권 제4호|pp. 448-465|DOI 10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.4.448

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

evolutionpre-service biology teachermisconceptionACORNSclass contents of evolution
주제분류교육학

초록

In this study, it was investigated the understanding of evolution concept, analyzed scientific concepts and misconceptions in the class about evolution unit of pre-service biology teachers, and examined the correlation between evolution concepts and class contents of evolution. Participants were 31 students in the department of biology education(15 sophomores and 16 seniors). ACORNS was used as an evolution concept assessment tool. As a result of ACORNS, 4th graders had higher scores on scientific concept than 2nd graders, and the number of mentions per student was higher. The frequency of the 7 scientific concepts were different, and the frequency of the concepts of ‘overproduction of offspring’, ‘competition’, and ‘the heritability of variation’ was low. Misconceptions appeared significantly in the 2nd graders, and ‘teleological explanations’ was the most common. As a result of analyzing the contents of the class about evolution unit, the scientific concepts appeared more than the ACORNS result, and the frequency was significantly higher in the 4th graders than the 2nd graders like ACORNS case. The number of pre-service biology teachers who referred to each scientific concept and the number of mentions differed by concept, and the tendency was similar to that of ACORNS. The misconceptions were less than the ACORNS result. Unlike in ACORNS, ‘creationism’ and ‘scheduled direction’ misconceptions appeared, and an explanation that recognizes ‘evolution’ as another event following ‘natural selection’ appeared. The ACORNS scientific concept was highly correlated with the frequency of scientific concept emergence in class demonstration. It is suggested as follows. It is necessary to teach the scientific concepts of evolution explicitly and to provide an opportunity to develop methodological knowledge that conveys the content of the evolution topic. It is also necessary to diversify the contents of textbook related to evolution.

Abstract

In this study, it was investigated the understanding of evolution concept, analyzed scientific concepts and misconceptions in the class about evolution unit of pre-service biology teachers, and examined the correlation between evolution concepts and class contents of evolution. Participants were 31 students in the department of biology education(15 sophomores and 16 seniors). ACORNS was used as an evolution concept assessment tool. As a result of ACORNS, 4th graders had higher scores on scientific concept than 2nd graders, and the number of mentions per student was higher. The frequency of the 7 scientific concepts were different, and the frequency of the concepts of ‘overproduction of offspring’, ‘competition’, and ‘the heritability of variation’ was low. Misconceptions appeared significantly in the 2nd graders, and ‘teleological explanations’ was the most common. As a result of analyzing the contents of the class about evolution unit, the scientific concepts appeared more than the ACORNS result, and the frequency was significantly higher in the 4th graders than the 2nd graders like ACORNS case. The number of pre-service biology teachers who referred to each scientific concept and the number of mentions differed by concept, and the tendency was similar to that of ACORNS. The misconceptions were less than the ACORNS result. Unlike in ACORNS, ‘creationism’ and ‘scheduled direction’ misconceptions appeared, and an explanation that recognizes ‘evolution’ as another event following ‘natural selection’ appeared. The ACORNS scientific concept was highly correlated with the frequency of scientific concept emergence in class demonstration. It is suggested as follows. It is necessary to teach the scientific concepts of evolution explicitly and to provide an opportunity to develop methodological knowledge that conveys the content of the evolution topic. It is also necessary to diversify the contents of textbook related to evolution.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Alters, B. J, "Perspective : Teaching evolution in higher education", Evolution, 56(10), pp.1891~1901 (2002)
  2. Bowler, P. J, "Evolution : The History of an Idea" (2009), University of California Press
  3. Brumby, M. N, "Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students", Science Education, 68, pp.493~503 (1984)
  4. Churchill, F. B, "August Weismann and a break from tradition", Journal of the History of Biology, 1(1), pp.91~112 (1968)
  5. Deadman, J. A, "What do secondary school boys understand about evolution and heredity before they are taught the topics?", Journal of Biology Education, 12(1), pp.7~15 (1978)
  6. Dobzhansky, T, "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution", The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), pp.125~129 (1973)
  7. Evans, E. M, "International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change", pp.263~294 (2008), Routledge
  8. Feldman, S, "A teacher quality manifesto", American Educator, 22(3), pp.5~7 (1998)
  9. 하민수, "중국, 미국, 독일의 생물전공자와 비교한 한국 생물예비교사의 자연선택개념 이해 수준 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(5), pp.729~737 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  10. 하민수, "예비생물교사와 현직생물교사의 진화 개념 비교 분석", 생물교육, 44(2), pp.277~288 (2016), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  11. 하민수, "과학사에 근거한 진화개념검사도구의 타당도 확인 및 맥락에 따른 진화개념 발달 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(3), pp.509~517 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  12. 하민수, "진화개념의 역사에 근거한 한국과 미국 대학생의 진화개념 수준 비교", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(4), pp.659~668 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  13. 하민수, "진화 기작에 관한 설명의 질적 횡단 연구", 생물교육, 35(1), pp.106~116 (2007), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  14. Ha, M, "Darwin’s difficulties and students’ struggles with trait loss: Cognitive-historical parallelisms in evolutionary explanation", Science & Education, 23(5), pp.1051~1074 (2014)
  15. 하민수, "설명대상에 따른 학생들의 진화 개념과 진화 개념 형성의 특성에 관한 횡단적 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(7), pp.813~825 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
  16. 하민수, "선택형, 서술형, 면담 방법을 통한 생물 예비교사들의 자연선택개념 이해 비교분석", 생물교육, 44(4), pp.618~632 (2016), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  17. 정주혜, "「증거 기반 설명 활동」이 고등학생들의 논변 수준과 진화 개념 변화에 미치는 영향", 생물교육, 38(1), pp.168~183 (2010), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  18. Kampourakis, K, "Students’ pre-conceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as "Lamarkian" when considering the history of evolution thought", Science & Education, 16(3-5), pp.393~422 (2007)
  19. Kampourakis, K, "Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations", Science & Education, 17(1), pp.27~47 (2008)
  20. Kelemen, D, "Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies : Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 142(4), pp.1074~ (2013)
  21. 고유선, "진화 교육 연구 경험 유무에 따른 생명과학 교사의 교수 실행 사례 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(4), pp.747~761 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  22. 구형규, "학생들의 종교적 신념으로 인한 진화론 학습의 장애요인 분석", 생물교육, 43(4), pp.355~367 (2015), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  23. 권지은, "교사들의 진화 개념 이해 향상을 위한 논변활동 프로그램 효과 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), pp.691~707 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  24. 이춘승, "중고등학생들의 진화에 관한 오개념 유형과 유형별 원인 분석", 생물교육, 35(4), pp.611~621 (2007), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  25. 이진영, "중학교 과학 수업에서 진화에 대한 개념 변화 수업 모형의 적용 효과", 생물교육, 45(1), pp.102~116 (2017), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  26. 이길재, "과학사에 근거한 학생들의 진화 개념 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), pp.25~39 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
  27. 이미숙, "진화 및 진화 수업에 대한 현직 교사 및 예비 교사들의 인식 조사", 생물교육, 36(4), pp.587~599 (2008), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  28. 이순남, "비진화단원 수업에 포함된 생물 교사들의 진화적 설명의 인식 과정에 관한 질적 사례 연구", 생물교육, 42(4), pp.450~466 (2014), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  29. Meir, E, "College students’ misconceptions about evolutionary trees", The American Biology Teacher, 69(7), pp.71~76 (2007)
  30. Ministry of Education, "Science Curriculum Based on the 2015 Revised Curriculum" (2015), Ministry of Education
  31. National Academy of Sciences, Working Group on Teaching Evolution, "Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science" (1998), National Academy Press
  32. Nehm, R. H, "Item feature effects in evolution assessment", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), pp.237~256 (2011)
  33. Nehm, R. H, "Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in school", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), pp.699~723 (2007)
  34. Nehm, R. H, "Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open response instrument, and an oral interview", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), pp.1131~1160 (2008)
  35. Nehm, R. H, "Reasoning about natural selection: Diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument", The American Biology Teacher, 74(2), pp.92~98 (2012)
  36. Scoring guide for the open response instrument (ORI) and evolutionary gain and loss test (EGALT), "Nehm, R. H", National Science Foundation, ~, pp.REESE Project 0909999 (2010)
  37. NRC (National Research Council), "Improving Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics" (2003), National Academy Press
  38. NRC (National Research Council), "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Cross-cutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (2011), National Academy Press
  39. NRC (National Research Council), "Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States" (2013), National Academy Press
  40. 박철진, "초등과학영재들의 자연선택 개념 형성을 위한 논변활동 효과 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(4), pp.591~606 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  41. 박재근, "한국과 미국 과학 교과서의 진화 내용 요소와 설명 방식에 대한 비교", 생물교육, 41(3), pp.406~420 (2013), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  42. Rutledge, M. L, "Evolutionary theory, the nature of science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships", The American Biology Teacher, 62(1), pp.23~31 (2000)
  43. Settlage, J, "Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense making process", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, pp.449~457 (1994)
  44. Smith, M. U, "Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues", Science & Education, 19(6-8), pp.539~571 (2010)
  45. 우현주, "제7차와 2009개정 과학 교육과정에 따른 중․고등학교 교과서 내진화단원의 연계성 분석", 생물교육, 41(4), pp.618~637 (2013), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

국내 생물교육 분야의 질적 연구 동향- 「생물교육」 학회지를 중심으로 -김남일, 이영미, 강은희pp. 411-4212015 개정 교육과정에 따른 중·고등학교 과학과 교과서의 진화 관련 단원 내용 및 기능 분석간치멕, 정태영, 차희영pp. 422-437Bloom의 신교육목표분류에 기초한 2015 개정 교육과정 『생명과학 I』 성취기준과 교과서 학습목표 분석김형미, 강경희pp. 438-447학교 안 야외 생태학습에서 관찰된 초등학생들의 참여 양상 변화와 그 요인 탐색주은정pp. 463-474대학 합성생물학 실습수업용 프로그램 개발 - 유전자 회로 조립 실험과 빛 테두리 그림 그리기 실험을 바탕으로 -송준현, 김아람, 김혜지pp. 475-490
원문 보기