본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학 교사 교육자의 역할에 대해 야누스적 관점으로 전환하기

Transforming a Science Teacher Educator’s Thinking of Roles into Janusian Perspectives

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study examined what conflicts transform a science teacher educator’s thinking of roles into Janusian perspectives, through an autobiographical inquiry process based on the educator’s lecture note and elementary pre- service teachers’ inquiry diaries. The teacher educator serving as the subject for this study has worked for a decade to play the role of fostering elementary school teachers. The findings are as follows: first, regarding the role of the “teacher of teachers,” the educator discussed in the regressive step mainly on how to cause interest, but in the synthetic step came to show a change of thinking into a Janusian perspective that scrutinizes both scientific knowledge and teaching methods; second, regarding the role of a “researcher,” the educator’s discussion in the regressive step focused on the importance of such a role rather than on teaching, but in the synthetic step came to have a Janusian perspective by which one can derive at once the research ideas from teaching and the teaching ideas from researching; third, regarding the role of a “curriculum developer,” the educator in the regressive step valued an inquiry- based curriculum, but in the synthetic step of closing a lecture came to have a Janusian perspective that deals both with inquiry and theory; and finally, regarding the role of an “emotional mentor,” the educator in the regressive step was unable to find a substantive emotional role, but in the synthetic step of closing a lecture came to have a Janusian perspective that considers the teacher educator’s and the pre-service teachers’ stories alike.

Abstract

This study examined what conflicts transform a science teacher educator’s thinking of roles into Janusian perspectives, through an autobiographical inquiry process based on the educator’s lecture note and elementary pre- service teachers’ inquiry diaries. The teacher educator serving as the subject for this study has worked for a decade to play the role of fostering elementary school teachers. The findings are as follows: first, regarding the role of the “teacher of teachers,” the educator discussed in the regressive step mainly on how to cause interest, but in the synthetic step came to show a change of thinking into a Janusian perspective that scrutinizes both scientific knowledge and teaching methods; second, regarding the role of a “researcher,” the educator’s discussion in the regressive step focused on the importance of such a role rather than on teaching, but in the synthetic step came to have a Janusian perspective by which one can derive at once the research ideas from teaching and the teaching ideas from researching; third, regarding the role of a “curriculum developer,” the educator in the regressive step valued an inquiry- based curriculum, but in the synthetic step of closing a lecture came to have a Janusian perspective that deals both with inquiry and theory; and finally, regarding the role of an “emotional mentor,” the educator in the regressive step was unable to find a substantive emotional role, but in the synthetic step of closing a lecture came to have a Janusian perspective that considers the teacher educator’s and the pre-service teachers’ stories alike.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Bartholomew, H., "Teaching students “ideas about science”: Five dimensions of effective practice", Science Education, 88(5), pp.655~682 (2004)
  2. Czerniawski, G., "The professional development needs of higher education-based teacher educators: An international comparative needs analysis", European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), pp.127~140 (2017)
  3. Dengerink, J., "The professional teacher educator : Six roles", Beiträge zur Leherinnen-und Lehrerbildung, 33(3), pp.1~11 (2015)
  4. "Supporting teacher educators for better learning outcomes" (2013)[URL]
  5. Gemmell, T., "What kind of research culture do teacher educators want, and how can we get it?", Studying Teacher Education, 6(2), pp.161~174 (2010)
  6. Hadar, L. L., "Individual growth and institutional advancement: The in-house model for teach er educators' professional learning in teaching and teacher education", 75 (2018)[DOI]
  7. Hattie, J., "Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?", Paper presented at Australian Counci l for Educational Research Conference (2003)
  8. 황혜영, "한국 교사교육자의 전문성 개발을 위한 셀프 연구(Self-study)의 도입", 한국교원교육연구, 30(1), pp.59~80 (2013), 한국교원교육학회[DOI]
  9. Hwang, J., "11 Thoughts about Creativity" (2012), Korea University Press
  10. 정정훈, "쿠레레를 통한 주관성의 회복: 좌절과 재건", 질적탐구, 1(1), pp.37~65 (2015), 한국질적탐구학회
  11. Kaya, H. I., "The perceptions of the prospective teachers about the democratıc attitudes of the teaching staffs (city of Kars case)", Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 2(1), pp.39~49 (2012)
  12. Korthagen, F., "Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programmes and practices", Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), pp.1020~1041 (2006)
  13. Kosnik, C., "Constructivism as a framework for literacy teacher education courses: The cases of six literacy teacher educators", European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), pp.105~119 (2018)
  14. Lee, S., "The application of Janusian thinking methodology in design education", Doctoral, pp.2019
  15. 이상훈, "야누스적 사고와 창의적인 발상 간의 상관관계", 조형미디어학, 23(1), pp.223~229 (2020), 한국일러스아트학회[DOI]
  16. Lunenberg, M., "The teacher educator as a role model", Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, pp.586~601 (2007)
  17. Pinar, W., "The Method of “currere.”", Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Research Association (1975)
  18. Ping, C., "Teacher educators’ professional learning: A literature review", Teaching and Teacher Education, 75(1), pp.93~104 (2018)
  19. Rothenberg, T. J, "Identification in parametric models", Econometrica, 39(3), pp.577~591 (1971)
  20. Seligman, M. E. P., "Positive psychology: An introduction", American Psychologist, 55(1), pp.5~14 (2000)
  21. Sever, I., "Supervision and the PhD process: Perspectives of research assistants", Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 7(1), pp.163~182 (2017)
  22. Smith, K., "Teacher educators’ expertise: What do novice teachers and teacher educators say?", Teaching Teachers, 21(2), pp.177~192 (2005)
  23. Smith, K., "Mentoring for LearningClimbing the Mountain", pp.299~312 (2015), Sense Publishers
  24. Smitha, K., "The Janus faced teacher educator", European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), pp.433~446 (2019)
  25. Snoek, M., "The quality of teacher educators in the European policy debate:Actions and measures to improve the professionalism of teacher educators", Professional Development in Education, 37(5), pp.651~664 (2011)
  26. Tunca, N., "Qualities of ideal teacher educators", Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), pp.122~148 (2015)
  27. Vanassche, E., "Facilitating selfstudy of teacher education practices : Toward a pedagogy of teacher educator professional development", Professional Development in Education, 42(1), pp.100~122 (2016)
  28. Willemse, M., "Values in education : A challenge for teacher educators", Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), pp.205~217 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)