본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중등 학생들의 세 가지 진화적 설명에 대한 수용 문항의 타당도 탐색 및 개념 군집 분석

Exploring the Validity of Questionnaire Measuring Secondary Students’ Acceptance of Three Evolution Explanations and Analyzing Conceptual Cluster of Evolution

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

This study aims to identify the validity and reliability of the questionnaire measuring secondary students’ acceptance of teleological, use/disuse, and natural selection explanation of evolutionary phenomena. In addition, this study also explores the conceptual clusters of students’ evolution concepts through performing a statistical clustering analysis. Lastly, this study explores the cross-sectional pattern of students’ evolution conception in accordance with students’ academic level. A total of 338 secondary students including 113 middle school students, 105 high school students in humanity track, and 120 high school students in science track participated in this study. A questionnaire consisted of six items about the three evolutionary explanations (teleology, use/disuse, and natural selection) of cheetah, mole, polar fox, rice insect, human brain, and rose were used. The results of several statistical analyses for validity test such as Rasch model analysis indicate that the questionnaire was valid and reliable enough to measure secondary students’ acceptance of three evolution explanations. Moreover, five conceptual clusters were found based on clustering analysis. In accordance with students’ academic level, only acceptance level of natural selection explanation was found an increase, while acceptance level of naïve explanations such as teleology and use/disuse remained stable. This study discusses an effective teaching strategy for evolution concept and the uses of clustering analysis for the research of students’ conception.

Abstract

This study aims to identify the validity and reliability of the questionnaire measuring secondary students’ acceptance of teleological, use/disuse, and natural selection explanation of evolutionary phenomena. In addition, this study also explores the conceptual clusters of students’ evolution concepts through performing a statistical clustering analysis. Lastly, this study explores the cross-sectional pattern of students’ evolution conception in accordance with students’ academic level. A total of 338 secondary students including 113 middle school students, 105 high school students in humanity track, and 120 high school students in science track participated in this study. A questionnaire consisted of six items about the three evolutionary explanations (teleology, use/disuse, and natural selection) of cheetah, mole, polar fox, rice insect, human brain, and rose were used. The results of several statistical analyses for validity test such as Rasch model analysis indicate that the questionnaire was valid and reliable enough to measure secondary students’ acceptance of three evolution explanations. Moreover, five conceptual clusters were found based on clustering analysis. In accordance with students’ academic level, only acceptance level of natural selection explanation was found an increase, while acceptance level of naïve explanations such as teleology and use/disuse remained stable. This study discusses an effective teaching strategy for evolution concept and the uses of clustering analysis for the research of students’ conception.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Bartov, H., "Can student be taught to distinguish between teleological and causal explanations?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(6), pp.567~572 (1978)
  2. Boone, J., "Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences" (2014), Springer
  3. Brumby, M. N., "Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students", Science Education, 68(4), pp.493~503 (1984)
  4. Churchill, F. B., "August Weismann and a break from tradition", Journal of the History of Biology, 1(1), pp.91~112 (1968)
  5. Dawkins, R., "The Blind Watchmaker" (1986), Penguin Books Ltd
  6. Deniz, H., "Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers : Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), pp.420~443 (2008)
  7. Fraley, C., "Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458), pp.611~631 (2002)
  8. Fraley, C., "Mclust Version 4 for R: Normal Mixture Modeling for Model-Based Clustering, Classification, and Density Estimation", University of Washington, ~ (2012)
  9. Gotthelf, A., "Aristotle’s conception of final causality", Review of Metaphysics, 30, pp.226~254 (1976)
  10. Ha, M., "Development of the instructional strategies of evolution based on the cross-sectional analysis of evolution conception", master, pp.2007
  11. 하민수, "예비생물교사와 현직생물교사의 진화 개념 비교 분석", 생물교육, 44(2), pp.277~288 (2016), 한국생물교육학회
  12. 하민수, "진화 기작에 관한 설명의 질적 횡단 연구", 생물교육, 35(1), pp.106~116 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
  13. 하민수, "설명대상에 따른 학생들의 진화 개념과 진화 개념 형성의 특성에 관한 횡단적 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(7), pp.813~825 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
  14. Ha, M., "Darwin’s difficulties and students’ struggles with trait loss : Cognitive-historical parallelisms in evolutionary explanation", Science & Education, 23(5), pp.1051~1074 (2014)
  15. Hewson, P. W., "The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction", Instructional Science, 13(1), pp.1~13 (1984)
  16. Hewson, P. W., "The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom", International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), pp.541~553 (1989)
  17. Hodgson, G. M., "Darwinism, causality and the social sciences", Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(2), pp.175~194 (2004)
  18. Jungwirth, E., "The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education", Journal of Biological Education, 9(6), pp.243~246 (1975)
  19. Kampourakis, K., "Students ’intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations", Science & Education, 17(1), pp.27~47 (2008)
  20. Kelemen, D., "Intuitions about origins : Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature", Journal of Cognition and Development, 6(1), pp.3~31 (2005)
  21. Kelemen, D., "The human function compunction : Teleological explanation in adults", Cognition, 111(1), pp.138~143 (2009)
  22. Kelemen, D., "Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies : Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 142(4), pp.1074~1083 (2013)
  23. 김경미, "디지털시대에 플립드 러닝을 활용한 학습자 맞춤형 소프트웨어 교육 방안 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 15(7), pp.55~64 (2017), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
  24. 이미숙, "예비 초등교사들의 진화 현상 설명에 관한 연구", 생물교육, 32(4), pp.360~369 (2004), 한국생물교육학회
  25. Mayr, E., "One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and The Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought" (1991), Harvard University Press
  26. Mills, M. S., "Student preference of a customized, openaccess multi-touch digital textbook in a graduate education course", Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(2), pp.123~137 (2016)
  27. Nehm, R. H., "Item feature effects in evolution assessment", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), pp.237~256 (2011)
  28. Nehm, R. H., "Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution : Biology versus non biology teachers", Science Education, 93(6), pp.1122~1146 (2009)
  29. Nehm, R. H., "Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools?", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), pp.699~723 (2007)
  30. Opfer, J. E., "Cognitive foundations for science assessment design : Knowing what students know about evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), pp.744~777 (2012)
  31. Punzo, A., "ContaminatedMixt:An R Package for Fitting Parsimonious Mixtures of Multivariate Contaminated Normal Distributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03766", ~ (2016)
  32. Shin, Y. J., "A crosssectional study of student understanding of the concept of natural selection", The Korean Journal of Biological Education, 24(1), pp.65~85 (1996)
  33. Sokolov, M., "Technology's impact on society : The issue of mass-customized education", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68(2), pp.195~206 (2001)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)