본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

판례분석을 통한 조세피난처 역외탈세에 관한 연구

Analysis on precedents to prevent offshore tax evasion via tax haven

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

South Korea’s response against tax haven abuse has been poor so far. This is because modern day finances and transaction methods have always exceeded expectations of the legal regime. Accordingly, no clear responsive measure has been established in the country’s actions against tax haven, undermining the effectiveness of its regulatory regime and amplifying uncertainties. The court also exercises strict legal interpretation in its rulings on this regard. In this situation, South Korea needs to closely examine its regulations on tax haven while re-organizing their relationships with other individual tax laws. In the case of the income law, in particular, which adopted the principle of positive system, there is high likelihood to avoid taxes by abusing such loopholes of the country’s taxation scheme. In this aspect, this research proposes measures to prevent offshore tax evasion as follows:First, simple terms like ‘paper company’ or ‘conduit company’ are being utilized for the convenience of taxation practices but these words are not clearly defined. For this reason, taxation authorities have frequently failed in the country regarding taxation lawsuits. Second, a foreign entity needs to be more clarified in the corporate tax law along with a resident in the income tax law. Third, the relationships among individual tax laws should be closely reviewed in order to clarify the kind of incomes possible to escape through loopholes in individual tax systems and prevent such an attempt in advance.

Abstract

South Korea’s response against tax haven abuse has been poor so far. This is because modern day finances and transaction methods have always exceeded expectations of the legal regime. Accordingly, no clear responsive measure has been established in the country’s actions against tax haven, undermining the effectiveness of its regulatory regime and amplifying uncertainties. The court also exercises strict legal interpretation in its rulings on this regard. In this situation, South Korea needs to closely examine its regulations on tax haven while re-organizing their relationships with other individual tax laws. In the case of the income law, in particular, which adopted the principle of positive system, there is high likelihood to avoid taxes by abusing such loopholes of the country’s taxation scheme. In this aspect, this research proposes measures to prevent offshore tax evasion as follows:First, simple terms like ‘paper company’ or ‘conduit company’ are being utilized for the convenience of taxation practices but these words are not clearly defined. For this reason, taxation authorities have frequently failed in the country regarding taxation lawsuits. Second, a foreign entity needs to be more clarified in the corporate tax law along with a resident in the income tax law. Third, the relationships among individual tax laws should be closely reviewed in order to clarify the kind of incomes possible to escape through loopholes in individual tax systems and prevent such an attempt in advance.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 백제흠, "피지배외국법인의 유보소득 과세제도에 관한 연구 : 미국과 일본의 세제와의 비교·분석을 통한 개선방안을 중심으로", 박사, 법학, pp.2005
  2. 安慶峰, "租稅回避에 관한 연구 : 典型的 去來를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1993
  3. 안경봉, "한국의 조세회피방지규정과 일반적 조세회피방지규정(GAAR) 도입방안", 조세법연구, 14(1), pp.241~275 (2008), 한국세법학회
  4. ATP(Aggressive Tax Planning) 사례와 대응방안, "안종석", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2006)
  5. 공격적 조세회피(ATP)에 대한 대응방안 연구, "안종석", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2007)
  6. 오윤, "세법상 거주자 개념", 조세학술논집, 24(1), pp.183~225 (2008), 한국국제조세협회
  7. 오윤, "FTA시대의 과세상 거주자 개념", 조세학술논집, 28(2), pp.35~73 (2012), 한국국제조세협회[DOI]
  8. 오윤, "해외금융계좌신고제도 개선방안", 조세학술논집, 28(1), pp.129~166 (2012), 한국국제조세협회
  9. 윤영선, "역외탈세 방지를 위한 국제적 논의 동향과 우리나라의 대응방안", 조세학술논집, 26(1), pp.167~186 (2010), 한국국제조세협회
  10. 국제적 조세회피 방지를 위한 연구 : 조세피난처의 이용과 조세조약 남용방지를 중심으로, "윤현석", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2005)
  11. 이경근, "국제조세조정에 관한 법률의 이론과 실무" (1998), 세경사
  12. 이경근, "국제조세의 이해와 실무" (2012), 영화조세통람
  13. 이동식, "조세회피행위 방지와 부당행위계산부인제도", 세무학연구, 25(2), pp.65~92 (2008), 한국세무학회
  14. 이은미, "조세피난처에 대한 국제적 대응과 조세정보교환협정", 조세학술논집, 26(2), pp.309~346 (2010), 한국국제조세협회
  15. 최경수, "조세피난처 세제적용의 국제적 과세동향과 그 시사점 - 미국과 일본의 과세실무를 중심으로 -", 조세학술논집, 24(1), pp.115~182 (2008), 한국국제조세협회
  16. 최선집, "조세법상 거주자개념에 관한 소고", 국제거래법연구, 2(1) (1993)
  17. 최성근, "단계거래원칙이 실질과세원칙에서 차지하는 지위와 부당한 단계거래의 판단기준", 조세법연구, 14(2), pp.156~183 (2008), 한국세법학회
  18. 역외탈세방지를 위한 조세행정상 역외금융정보 확보제도연구, "홍범교", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2009)
  19. 황영순, "조세피난처를 이용한 공격적인 조세회피 방지 방안에 관한 연구", 박사, 세무학, pp.2010

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)