Comparison of nutrient removal efficiency of an infiltration planter and an infiltration trench
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nutrients in stormwater runoff have raised concerns regarding water quality degradation in the recent years. Low impact development (LID) technologies are types of nature-based solutions developed to address water quality problems and restore the predevelopment hydrology of a catchment area. Two LID facilities, infiltration trench (IT) and infiltration planter (IP), are known for their high removal rate of nutrients through sedimentation and vegetation. Long-term monitoring was conducted to assess the performance and cite the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing the facilities in nutrient removal. Since a strong ionic bond exists between phosphorus compounds and sediments, reduction of total phosphorus (TP) (more than 76%), in both facilities was associated to the removal of total suspended solids (TSS) (more than 84%). The efficiency of nitrogen in IP is 28% higher than IT. Effective nitrification occurred in IT and particulate forms of nitrogen were removed through sedimentation and media filters. Decrease in ammonium- nitrogen (NH4-N) and nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N), and increase in nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) fraction forms indicated that effective nitrification and denitrification occurred in IP. Hydrologic factors such as rainfall depth and rainfall intensity affected nutrient treatment capabilities of urban stormwater LID facilities The greatest monitored rainfall intensity of 11 mm/hr for IT yielded to 34% and 55% removal efficiencies for TN and TP, respectively, whereas, low rainfall intensities below 5 mm resulted to 100 % removal efficiency. The greatest monitored rainfall intensity for IP was 27 mm/hr, which still resulted to high removal efficiencies of 98% and 97% for TN and TP, respectively. Water quality assessment showed that both facilities were effective in reducing the amount of nutrients; however, IP was found to be more efficient than IT due to its additional provisions for plant uptake and larger storage volume.
Abstract
Nutrients in stormwater runoff have raised concerns regarding water quality degradation in the recent years. Low impact development (LID) technologies are types of nature-based solutions developed to address water quality problems and restore the predevelopment hydrology of a catchment area. Two LID facilities, infiltration trench (IT) and infiltration planter (IP), are known for their high removal rate of nutrients through sedimentation and vegetation. Long-term monitoring was conducted to assess the performance and cite the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing the facilities in nutrient removal. Since a strong ionic bond exists between phosphorus compounds and sediments, reduction of total phosphorus (TP) (more than 76%), in both facilities was associated to the removal of total suspended solids (TSS) (more than 84%). The efficiency of nitrogen in IP is 28% higher than IT. Effective nitrification occurred in IT and particulate forms of nitrogen were removed through sedimentation and media filters. Decrease in ammonium- nitrogen (NH4-N) and nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N), and increase in nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) fraction forms indicated that effective nitrification and denitrification occurred in IP. Hydrologic factors such as rainfall depth and rainfall intensity affected nutrient treatment capabilities of urban stormwater LID facilities The greatest monitored rainfall intensity of 11 mm/hr for IT yielded to 34% and 55% removal efficiencies for TN and TP, respectively, whereas, low rainfall intensities below 5 mm resulted to 100 % removal efficiency. The greatest monitored rainfall intensity for IP was 27 mm/hr, which still resulted to high removal efficiencies of 98% and 97% for TN and TP, respectively. Water quality assessment showed that both facilities were effective in reducing the amount of nutrients; however, IP was found to be more efficient than IT due to its additional provisions for plant uptake and larger storage volume.
참고문헌 (21)
- Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, "APHA", APHA, AWWA & WEF, ~ (1992)
- Akan, A. O., "Modified rational method for sizing infiltration structures", Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(4), pp.539~542 (2002)
- Brown, R. A., "Improving bioretention", biofiltration performance with restorative maintenance, 2012, pp.65(2), 361~367
- Chen, Y., "Evaluation of the different filter media in vertical flow stormwater wetland", Desalination and Water Treatment, 51(19-21), pp.4097~4106 (2013)
- Chow, M. F., "Relationship between sediment build-up characteristics and antecedent dry days on different urban road surfaces in Malaysia", Urban Water Journal, 12(3), pp.240~247 (2015)
- Dierkes, C., "General technical approvals for decentralised sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS)―The current situation in Germany", Sustainability, 7(3), pp.3031~3051 (2015)
- Fadiran, A. O., "A comparative study of the phosphate levels in some surface and ground water bodiesof Swaziland", Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia, 22(2) (2008)
- Fletcher, T. D., "SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more–The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage", Urban Water Journal, 12(7), pp.525~542 (2015)
- Geronimo, F. K. F., "Treatment of parking lot runoff by a tree box filter", Desalination and water treatment, 51(19-21), pp.4044~4049 (2013)
- Hatt, B. E., "Filter media for stormwater treatment and recycling: the influence of hydraulic properties of flow on pollutant removal", Water Science and Technology, 54(6-7), pp.263~271 (2006)
- Jiang, C., "Field performance of bioretention systems for runoff quantity regulation and pollutant removal", Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 228(12), pp.468~ (2017)
- Khatri, N., "Influences of natural and anthropogenic factors on surface and groundwater quality in rural and urban areas", Frontiers in Life Science, 8(1), pp.23~39 (2015)
- Kim, L. H., "Sediment characteristics, phosphorus types and phosphorus release rates between river and lake sediments", Chemosphere, 50(1), pp.53~61 (2003)
- Mangangka, I. R., "Performance characterisation of a stormwater treatment bioretention basin", Journal of environmental management, 150, pp.173~178 (2015)
- Maniquiz, M. C., "Flow and mass balance analysis of eco-bio infiltration system", Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 6(5), pp.612~619 (2012)
- Maniquiz-Redillas, M. C., "Understanding the factors influencing the removal of heavy metals in urban stormwater runoff", Water Science and Technology, 73(12), pp.2921~2928 (2016)
- Jean Margaret R. Mercado, "Characteristics of stormwater runoff from urbanized areas", 한국습지학회지, 14(2), pp.159~168 (2012), 한국습지학회
- Mercado, J. M. R., "Laboratory study on the clogging potential of a hybrid best management practice", Desalination and Water Treatment, 53(11), pp.3126~3133 (2015)
- Oregon State University, "Evaluation of Best Management" (2006), Transportation Research Board
- N. J. D.G. Reyes, "Performance assessment of an urban stormwater infiltration trench considering facility maintenance", 한국습지학회지, 20(4), pp.424~431 (2018), 한국습지학회
- Yang, Y. Y., "Sources and mechanisms of nitrate and orthophosphate transport in urban stormwater runoff from residential catchments", Water research, 112, pp.176~184 (2017)