본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가구디자인에 있어 자연과 기술의 기호적 내포에 관한 연구 - 베르너 판톤과 죠 콜롬보의 1960년대 작품을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Connotative Signs of Nature and Technology in Furniture Design - Focused on Verner Panton’s and Joe Colombo’s 1960’s Furniture -

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Nature and technology are very popular themes in the everydayness of modern world. In our industrial age which is based on technology nature becomes an lost origin and basic environment. On the other hand, technology is conceived as future hope and realistic environment. Through 1960s they had been transformed as signs and connoted into furniture design. As signs, they structured environment, organized space, and bred their own aesthetics. In this context, Danish designer Verner Panton presented nature as experiential landscape and Italian designer Joe Colombo expressed technology as amusing machine. What they showed were not real but sign of nature and machine. Nonetheless they were successful to create aesthetic atmosphere and meaningful projects. Also they showed the potentiality that furniture design might include discoursive issues and values. They also extended functional interesting between furniture and body to cultural domain of social viewpoint in behavioral pattern.

Abstract

Nature and technology are very popular themes in the everydayness of modern world. In our industrial age which is based on technology nature becomes an lost origin and basic environment. On the other hand, technology is conceived as future hope and realistic environment. Through 1960s they had been transformed as signs and connoted into furniture design. As signs, they structured environment, organized space, and bred their own aesthetics. In this context, Danish designer Verner Panton presented nature as experiential landscape and Italian designer Joe Colombo expressed technology as amusing machine. What they showed were not real but sign of nature and machine. Nonetheless they were successful to create aesthetic atmosphere and meaningful projects. Also they showed the potentiality that furniture design might include discoursive issues and values. They also extended functional interesting between furniture and body to cultural domain of social viewpoint in behavioral pattern.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Anne Bony, "Furniture & Interiors of the 1960s", Flammarion, 11, pp.219~ (2004)
  2. Alexander von. Vegesack., "Verner Panton The collected works" (2000), Vitra Design Museum
  3. Jean Baudrillard, "The System of Objects", pp.13~15 (2005), Verso
  4. Jeremy Aynsley, "Imagined Interiors: Presenting the domestic interior since the renaissance", pp.207~209 (2006), V&A PUBLICATIONS
  5. Vitra Design Museum, "Joe Colombo Inventing the Future", 148~151 (2005)
  6. 정정호, "포스트모더니즘론", pp.142~ (1990), 도서출판 터
  7. 로버트 벤투리, "기호와 시스템으로 읽는 건축", pp.20~21 (2009)
  8. 레이너 밴험, "제1기계시대의 이론과 디자인", pp.13~ (1999), 세진사
  9. 배영달, "보드리야르의 아이러니", pp.21~23 (2009), 東文選
  10. 앨리슨 스미드슨, "현대도시건축의 언어 팀X 프라이머", pp.18~ (1991), 태림문화사
  11. 필립 드류, "건축의 제3세대", pp.19~23 (1989), 기문당

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)