텍토닉적 관점으로 본 캄파냐 형제의 가구디자인 연구
A Study on the Campana Brothers’ Furniture Design from Tectonic Viewpoint
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Brazilian furniture designers, Campana brothers usually use unsuitable material for making furniture. They utilize leftover pieces of plywood, stuffed dolls, plastic hoses, corrugated cardboard, and natural fiber. Therefore the connection between these objects become the most important issue as for manufacturing. Tectonic design evolves from this flow. Analysis on Campana’s works reveals that they adopt three tectonic details such as weaning, piling-up, and mixing of weaving and piling-up. These are profoundly fundamental tectonic techniques in architecture according to Semper and Bötticher. Tectonic means not just construction technology but also aesthetical value. Brothers’ tectonic follow Brazilian gambiarra tradition which is spontaneous and makeshift problem-solving creativity. As a result, their design can represent Brazilian regionality. Also the accumulation of handheld material produces plentiful tactile surfaces that satisfy human corporality.
Abstract
Brazilian furniture designers, Campana brothers usually use unsuitable material for making furniture. They utilize leftover pieces of plywood, stuffed dolls, plastic hoses, corrugated cardboard, and natural fiber. Therefore the connection between these objects become the most important issue as for manufacturing. Tectonic design evolves from this flow. Analysis on Campana’s works reveals that they adopt three tectonic details such as weaning, piling-up, and mixing of weaving and piling-up. These are profoundly fundamental tectonic techniques in architecture according to Semper and Bötticher. Tectonic means not just construction technology but also aesthetical value. Brothers’ tectonic follow Brazilian gambiarra tradition which is spontaneous and makeshift problem-solving creativity. As a result, their design can represent Brazilian regionality. Also the accumulation of handheld material produces plentiful tactile surfaces that satisfy human corporality.
참고문헌 (10)
- 고경훈, "시게루 반 건축의 텍토닉 특성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2016
- 게보르크 하투니안, "건축 텍토닉과 기술 니힐리즘", pp.57~
- 정인하, "고트프리트 젬퍼와 칼 뵈티허의 텍토닉개념 비교", 건축역사연구, 12, pp.87~ (1998)
- 정만영, "물성의 재-현으로서의 건축- 젬퍼의 피복에서 헤르족과 드 뮈롱의 표면으로 -", 건축역사연구, 14(1), pp.107~122 (2005), 한국건축역사학회
- Alferd D, "Campana Brothers Complete Works", pp.49~299 (2010), Rizzoli
- Semper G, "Style", pp.113~ (2004), Getty Research Institute
- Frampton K, "Studies in Tectonic Culture", pp.3~4 (1996), MIT Press
- Frampton K, "The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Post-Modern Culture", pp.24~29 (1983), Bay Press