그린스마트 미래 초등학교 외부공간의 친환경성 향상을 위한 공공시설물 사용 현황 분석
Analysis of the Status of Public Facility Use to Improve the Eco-Friendliness of the External Space of Green Smart Future Elementary School
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The school space, which had been the most unchanged, is undergoing many changes as the school space innovation project began in 2018 and the Green Smart Future School Project is expanding nationwide in 2020. However, these changes are focusing on creating a fu- ture educational environment, so there are many changes in the interior space that introduces smart facilities rather than the exterior space. However, changes in the exterior space are im- portant in school education as well as the interior space, and securing eco-friendliness and sus- tainability, as in the name of the Green Smart Project, is very important. Accordingly, this study focused on elementary schools where outdoor activities are the most important, and sought alternatives to emphasize the image as an eco-friendly future school and to strengthen the school identity and increase sustainability through public facilities. To this end, we inves- tigated the external space composition and installed public facilities centered on 10 domestic Green Smart Future Schools, analyzed the types, and investigated which facilities were reflected in an eco-friendly manner. The research results showed that the facilities with the most items applied were supply facilities (37 items) > road facilities (20 items) > environmental facilities (11 items) > convenience facilities (9 items) > play facilities, others (9 items), and the in- stallation ratio was investigated to be 76.5% for road facilities, 60.3% for supply facilities, 58.9% for convenience facilities, 57.1% for others, 50% for play facilities, and 40% for environ- mental facilities. By detailed facility, the application rate was investigated as follows: 95% for amusement facilities, 82.2% for management facilities, 80.0% for passage facilities, 76.0% for boundary facilities, 73.8% for traffic facilities, 73.3% for sanitation facilities, 66.3% for pro- tection facilities, 65.0% for information facilities, 57.1% for U-City related facilities, 51.7% for rest facilities, 47.5% for green facilities, 45.0% for lighting facilities, 35.7% for landscape facili- ties, 32.0% for sports facilities, and 22.5% for service facilities. In addition, the most numerous design type is play facilities, and the most frequently applied eco-friendly planning elements were the material aspects such as utilization of natural materials, utilization of long-life materi- als, and recyclable materials, and facilities using clean energy were investigated, but it was found that eco-friendly considerations are necessary in various aspects.
Abstract
The school space, which had been the most unchanged, is undergoing many changes as the school space innovation project began in 2018 and the Green Smart Future School Project is expanding nationwide in 2020. However, these changes are focusing on creating a fu- ture educational environment, so there are many changes in the interior space that introduces smart facilities rather than the exterior space. However, changes in the exterior space are im- portant in school education as well as the interior space, and securing eco-friendliness and sus- tainability, as in the name of the Green Smart Project, is very important. Accordingly, this study focused on elementary schools where outdoor activities are the most important, and sought alternatives to emphasize the image as an eco-friendly future school and to strengthen the school identity and increase sustainability through public facilities. To this end, we inves- tigated the external space composition and installed public facilities centered on 10 domestic Green Smart Future Schools, analyzed the types, and investigated which facilities were reflected in an eco-friendly manner. The research results showed that the facilities with the most items applied were supply facilities (37 items) > road facilities (20 items) > environmental facilities (11 items) > convenience facilities (9 items) > play facilities, others (9 items), and the in- stallation ratio was investigated to be 76.5% for road facilities, 60.3% for supply facilities, 58.9% for convenience facilities, 57.1% for others, 50% for play facilities, and 40% for environ- mental facilities. By detailed facility, the application rate was investigated as follows: 95% for amusement facilities, 82.2% for management facilities, 80.0% for passage facilities, 76.0% for boundary facilities, 73.8% for traffic facilities, 73.3% for sanitation facilities, 66.3% for pro- tection facilities, 65.0% for information facilities, 57.1% for U-City related facilities, 51.7% for rest facilities, 47.5% for green facilities, 45.0% for lighting facilities, 35.7% for landscape facili- ties, 32.0% for sports facilities, and 22.5% for service facilities. In addition, the most numerous design type is play facilities, and the most frequently applied eco-friendly planning elements were the material aspects such as utilization of natural materials, utilization of long-life materi- als, and recyclable materials, and facilities using clean energy were investigated, but it was found that eco-friendly considerations are necessary in various aspects.
참고문헌 (11)
- 교육부, "학교건축 표준업무 매뉴얼", pp.15~18 (2016), 교육부 교육 시설과
- 김자경, "경기장 주변 친환경성 향상을 위한 공공 시설물에 관한 연구", 디자인융복합연구, 22(2), pp.69~90 (2023)
- 박종혜, "사용자를 고려한 초등학교 옥외공간 계획과정에 관한 연구", 한국생활과학회지, 30(4), pp.675~690 (2021)
- 윤종영, "도시디자인을 고려한 공공시설물 개발에 관한 연구", 한국디자인문화학회지, 22(1), pp.276~ (2016)
- 이병호, "2022년 그린스마트스쿨 인사이트 투어 사례집", pp.8~12 (2023), 교육부 교육시설안전팀
- 이양병, "공공시설물디자인 평가 방법론에 관한 연구", 박사, 디자인경영학, pp.2011
- 인천시, "인천광역시 공공디자인 가이드라인", pp.33~ (2009)
- 정지원, "그린스마트 미래학교 조성 가이드 라인 분석을 통한 개선 방향 연구", 한국문화공간건축학회 2022 춘계학술대회논문집, pp.1~6 (2022)
- 하소형, "소규모 초등학교의 외부 공간 사용에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집, pp.261~264 (2008)
- "2022년 그린스마트 미래학교 추진계획" (2022), 대한민국 정책브리핑[URL]
- "디자인 서울 공공시설물 가이드라인" (2020), 서울시[URL]
