A Discussion on the Oakeshott’s Political View of Intimation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The contribution of this paper lies in that Oakeshott (1901∼1990) proposes a new view of political thought: the politics is the pursuit of an intimation. Method: To do this, this paper analyzed Oakeshott’s political thought and his criticism on Rationalist politics. Results: This new political view can be seen as a paradigm instead of the traditional views of rationalist politics. And the traditional political view of rationalism of the West has experienced the process from “the pursuit of good politics” of ancient Greece to “the pursuit of utilitarian politics” of modern times (that is to say, virtue is no longer to be the “king” of the political philosophy, rationality has occupied its position), the dilemma of this political view lies in the confusing of the problems of “fact-value distinction”. For this reason, Oakeshott believes that politics is a sort of practical activity for the participation in an arrangements. On one hand, the tradition of behavior is an arrangement, on the other hand, it is also unfinished. Conclusion: In this sense, the theory of politics is a kind of theory about the intimations of a tradition of behavior. Beginning from the interpretation of the political activity itself, this paper examines the political view of rationalism through the analysis of the theory of intimation and its implications.
Abstract
Purpose: The contribution of this paper lies in that Oakeshott (1901∼1990) proposes a new view of political thought: the politics is the pursuit of an intimation. Method: To do this, this paper analyzed Oakeshott’s political thought and his criticism on Rationalist politics. Results: This new political view can be seen as a paradigm instead of the traditional views of rationalist politics. And the traditional political view of rationalism of the West has experienced the process from “the pursuit of good politics” of ancient Greece to “the pursuit of utilitarian politics” of modern times (that is to say, virtue is no longer to be the “king” of the political philosophy, rationality has occupied its position), the dilemma of this political view lies in the confusing of the problems of “fact-value distinction”. For this reason, Oakeshott believes that politics is a sort of practical activity for the participation in an arrangements. On one hand, the tradition of behavior is an arrangement, on the other hand, it is also unfinished. Conclusion: In this sense, the theory of politics is a kind of theory about the intimations of a tradition of behavior. Beginning from the interpretation of the political activity itself, this paper examines the political view of rationalism through the analysis of the theory of intimation and its implications.
참고문헌 (29)
- Beiner, R., "Political philosophy: What it is and why it matters" (2014), Cambridge University Press
- Coats, W. J., "Michael Oakeshott as liberal theorist", Canadian Journal of Political Science, XVIII(4), pp.773~787 (1985)
- Devigne, R., "Recasting conservation: Oakeshott, Strauss, and the response to post-modernism" (1994), Yale University Press
- Engel, S. M., "Political education in", as the practice of freedom : A paradoxical defence from the perspective of Michael Oakeshott, 2007, pp.41(3), 325~349
- Franco, P., "Michael Oakeshott: An introduction" (2004), Yale University Press
- Fuller, T., "Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century", pp.142~153 (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Fuller, T., "The legacy of Michael Oakeshott", Political Theory, 27(1), pp.131~139 (1999)
- Grant, R., "Review of religion, politics and the moral life and morality and politics in modern europe: The Harvard lectures, 1958", Times Literacy, 15, pp.31~32 (1994)
- Grant, R., "Politics of sex & other essays: On conservatism, culture and imagination" (2000), Palgrave Macmillan
- Himmelfarb, G., "The conservative imagination : Michael Oakeshott", The American Scholar, 44(3), pp.405~420 (1975)
- Kekes, J., "Against liberalism" (1997), Cornell University Press
- McClelland, J. S., "A history of western political thought" (1996), Routledge Press
- Meier, H., "Why political philosophy", The Review of Metaphysics, 56(2), pp.385~407 (2002)
- Neil, E., "Major conservative and libertarian thinker: Michael Oakeshott" (2009), Continuum International Publishing
- Noddings, N., "Philosophy of education" (2015), Westview Press
- Oakeshott, M., "Experience and its modes" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Oakeshott, M., "The politics of faith and the politics of scepticism" (1996), Yale University Press
- Oakeshott, M., "In the voice of liberal learning" (1989), Yale University Press
- Oakeshott, M., "In rationalism in politics and other essays" (1991), Liberty Press
- Oakeshott, M., "In rationalism in politics and other essays" (1991), Liberty Press
- Oakeshott, M., "In rationalism in politics and other essays" (1991), Liberty Press
- Oakeshott, M., "In rationalism in politics and other essays" (1991), Liberty Press
- Oakeshott, M., "Religion, politics and the moral life" (1993), Yale University Press
- Oakeshott, M., "The Harvard lectures" (1993), Yale University Press
- Oakeshott, M., "On history and other essays" (1983), Blackwell
- Oakeshott, M., "On human conduct" (1991), Clarendon Press
- Oakeshott, M., "Rationalism in politics: A reply to professor raphael", Political Studies, 13, pp.89~92 (1965)
- Rees, J. C., "Professor Oakeshott on political education", Mind, 62(245), pp.68~74 (1953)
- Wolin, S. S., "Politics and vision: Continuity and innovation in western political thought" (2006), Princeton University Press