당뇨교육자료 자료의 이독성과 적합성 평가
Readability and Suitability Evaluation of Educational Materials on Diabetes Mellitus
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study was to evaluate the readability and suitability of patients' education materials on DM. A total of 34 materials on DM from public health centers, general hospitals, and internet web sites were evaluated for readability by 'graded system of vocabulary', and suitability by 'The Korean version of SAM(Suitability Assessment of Materials)'. On the average, 28.3% of 1st grade reading level words, 27.1% of 5th grade level and over were included in educational materials. For suitability, 6(17.6%) were judged superior, 20(58.8%) adequate, 8(23.6%) inadequate. The reading level of the materials was higher than the recommended reading level(6th grade reading level). For suitability, most of materials were inadequate in some of items such as 'summary or review included', 'context given', 'interaction used'. It is proposed that in the development of patients' educational materials, health literacy of target population should be considered.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the readability and suitability of patients' education materials on DM. A total of 34 materials on DM from public health centers, general hospitals, and internet web sites were evaluated for readability by 'graded system of vocabulary', and suitability by 'The Korean version of SAM(Suitability Assessment of Materials)'. On the average, 28.3% of 1st grade reading level words, 27.1% of 5th grade level and over were included in educational materials. For suitability, 6(17.6%) were judged superior, 20(58.8%) adequate, 8(23.6%) inadequate. The reading level of the materials was higher than the recommended reading level(6th grade reading level). For suitability, most of materials were inadequate in some of items such as 'summary or review included', 'context given', 'interaction used'. It is proposed that in the development of patients' educational materials, health literacy of target population should be considered.
참고문헌 (25)
- K. Johnson., "How long does it take to assess literacy skills in clinical practice?", Journal of American Board Family Medicine, 21, pp.211~214 (2008)
- D. A. Dewalt., "Literacy and health outcomes : a systematic review of the literature", Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(12), pp.1228~1139 (2004)
- American Medical Association : Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, "Health Literacy : Report of the council on scientific affairs", Journal of the American Medical Association, 281(6), pp.552~557 (1999)
- C. Zarcadoolas., "Advancing Health Literacy: A Framework for Understanding and Action", pp.75~92 (2006), Jossey-Bass
- D. A. Dewalt., "The role of literacy in health and health care", American Family Physician, 72(3), pp.387~388 (2005)
- C. S. Shieh., "Printed Health Information Materials : Evaluation of Readability and Suitability", Journal of Community Health Nursing, 25, pp.73~90 (2008)
- P. S. Houts., "The role of pictures in improving health communication : a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence", Patient Education and Counseling, 61, pp.173~190 (2006)
- R. Pawlak, "Economic considerations of health literacy", Nursing Economics, 23, pp.173~180 (2005)
- F. Wilson., "Can easy-to-read immunization information increase knowledge in urban low-income mothers?", Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 21, pp.4~12 (2006)
- E. Kang., "An evaluation of pediatric dental patient education materials using contemporary health literacy measures", Pediatric Dentistry, 27, pp.409~413 (2005)
- 김수연, "고혈압 환자교육 자료의 독해력 수준 평가", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 28(5), pp.346~351 (2007), 대한가정의학회
- 이태화, "고혈압 교육 인쇄물의 적합성 및 이독성 평가", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 41(3), pp.333~343 (2011), 한국간호과학회
- 성낙진, "대한가정의학회 제작 환자교육자료 평가", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 25(9), pp.669~677 (2004), 대한가정의학회
- H. R. Yoo, "Readability of printed educational materials used to inform computer tomography", Journal of Korean Community Nursing, 12, pp.670~679 (2001)
- W.C. Choi, "Concept and Characteristics of lexile score", Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Korean Language & Literature Education, pp.21~48 (2011)
- C. C, Doak., "Teaching patients with low literacy skills", pp.127~143 (1996), JB Lippincott Company
- "Korean Thesaurus" (2009)[URL]
- 진영란, "요양보호사 교육기관 교육서비스 질 평가 도구개발", 보건의료산업학회지, 7(4), pp.33~47 (2013), 보건의료산업학회
- 서정교, "보건교육 수강여부에 따른 보건 인식·태도·지식의 차이에 관한 연구", 보건의료산업학회지, 6(2), pp.121~131 (2012), 보건의료산업학회[DOI]
- S. Y. Park, "Comparison of readability of 6th grade science and social studies textbook", 석사, pp.2009
- J. K. Vallance., "Suitability and readability assessment of educational print resources related to physical activity : implications and recommendations for practice", Patient Education and Counseling, 72, pp.342~349 (2008)
- D. Webber., "Enhancing recall of information form a patient education booklet : a trial using cardiomyopathy patients", Patient Education and Counseling, 44, pp.263~270 (2001)
- C. L. Paul., "A cost-effective approach to the development of printed materials : A randomized controlled trial of three strategies", Health Education Research, 19, pp.698~706 (2004)
- J. Schwartzberg., "Understanding Health Literacy: Implications for Medicine and Public Health", pp.83~102 (2005), AMA Press
- K. Wolff., "The Diabetes Literacy and Numeracy Education Toolkit(DLNET) : Materials to facillitate Diabetes education and management in patients with low literacy and numeracy skills", The Diabetes Educator, 35(2), pp.233~245 (2009)