知识产权拒绝交易反垄断规制的难点及对策
Antitrust Regulation Difficulties and Countermeasures of Intellectual Property Rights Refusal Deals
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Market competition under the conditions of knowledge-based economy will be mainly expand with intellectual property rights so that the intellectual property refusal deals become an important means of intellectual property rights to prevent competitors from entering the market; The network effects in the network industry suddenly expanded the endangerment of the practices of one who owns the intellectual property and refuses to deal on competition. Therefore, there is an urgent need for anti-monopoly law to regulate those behavior mentioned above. However, the relationship between intellectual property rights and antitrust laws is complicated,which, under the antitrust regulation for the refusal deals of intellectual property,lead to a number of important and difficult issues, such as the refusal deals antitrust regulation "reasonable limits" of intellectual property rights is difficult to grasp, and the uncertainty of whether specific intellectual property refusal deal behavior breaks the law or not. There are some limitations to the "critical facilities" theory applies to the owner of intellectual property refusal deals, which makes the intellectual property refusal deals and antitrust regulation extremely difficult. These difficult issues can make efforts in the following aspects: take a different principle of treatment to the intellectual property rights refusal deals between traditional economy and new economic industry; provide the rules of specialanti-monopoly obligation for the owner of intellectual property rights based on the internet and communication products; establish the multiple influencing factors and the new system regulations should be considered when judging the competitive harm to the intellectual property rights refusal deals.
Abstract
Market competition under the conditions of knowledge-based economy will be mainly expand with intellectual property rights so that the intellectual property refusal deals become an important means of intellectual property rights to prevent competitors from entering the market; The network effects in the network industry suddenly expanded the endangerment of the practices of one who owns the intellectual property and refuses to deal on competition. Therefore, there is an urgent need for anti-monopoly law to regulate those behavior mentioned above. However, the relationship between intellectual property rights and antitrust laws is complicated,which, under the antitrust regulation for the refusal deals of intellectual property,lead to a number of important and difficult issues, such as the refusal deals antitrust regulation "reasonable limits" of intellectual property rights is difficult to grasp, and the uncertainty of whether specific intellectual property refusal deal behavior breaks the law or not. There are some limitations to the "critical facilities" theory applies to the owner of intellectual property refusal deals, which makes the intellectual property refusal deals and antitrust regulation extremely difficult. These difficult issues can make efforts in the following aspects: take a different principle of treatment to the intellectual property rights refusal deals between traditional economy and new economic industry; provide the rules of specialanti-monopoly obligation for the owner of intellectual property rights based on the internet and communication products; establish the multiple influencing factors and the new system regulations should be considered when judging the competitive harm to the intellectual property rights refusal deals.
참고문헌 (18)
- 平秋克, "微观经济学 第4版", pp.162~ (2000), 中国人民大学出版社
- 理查德, "新经济中的反托拉斯 王传辉译,载漆多俊主编《经济法论丛》第6卷" (2002), 中国方正出版社
- Josef Drexl, "Abuse of Dominance in Licensing and Refusal to License: A ‘Move Economic Approach’ to Competition by Imitation and to Competition by Substitution. European Competition Law Annual" (2007), Portland Oregon
- "See EC Directive 91", 250 on the Legal protection of Computer programmes, 1991
- Toshiaki Takigawa, "Antitrust intervention in intellectual property licensing and unilateral refusal to license", pp.78~90 (2003), Winter
- 卫涵瑜, "从微软案看欧盟法律对知识产权领域拒绝许可行为的规", 经营管理者, 10, pp.63~ (2010)
- 叶珊, "知识产权法在知识经济社会中的作用", 理论月刊, 6 (2002)
- 刘雁, "论我国高新技术产业的发展现状及对策", 吉林师范大学学报, 3 (2004)
- 李京文, "促进知识生产和传播", 人民日报 1998年11月14日第7版, ~ (1998)
- 吴汉东, "中国入世10年的知识产权事业", 知识产权, 10, pp.14~ (2011)
- 姚保松, "论基础设施条款在知识产权领域的适用", 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 1, pp.25~ (2008)
- 射群, "软件知识产权保护模式的比较", 知识产权, 4 (2005)
- 宾雪花, "美国修改《数字千年版权法》的反垄断法解读", 河北法学, 10, pp.168~ (2011)
- 黄宗乐, "知识经济与竞争政策", 公平交易季刊台, 1 (2003)
- 彭霞, "欧盟竞争法规制知识产权拒绝许可对我国的启示", 电子知识产权, 8, pp.68~ (2009)
- 韩立余, "从欧美微软来看知识产权权利的反垄断法限制, In 反垄断法比较研究", pp.120~ (2006), 人民法院出版社
- 韩立余, "从欧美微软案看知识产权权利的反垄断法限制, In 反垄断法比较研究", pp.120~ (2006), 人民法院出版社
- 谭华霖, "知识产权权利冲突论纲", 박사, pp.2007
