본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국 증여세제의 중요현안과 과제

Current legal Issues in Korean Gift Taxation

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article aims at the current legal issues on gift taxation in Korea. Gift taxation is very dramatically increasing in Korea. In 2005 Korea has introduced a fully comprehensive gift tax in korean Inheritance and Gift tax(KIGT) law. The legislative purpose was to prevent an anomalous shift of wealth without cost. But fully comprehensive taxation can violate the principle of substantial legislated taxation. And also it can incapacitate the principle of proportionality. According to Dworkin and Alexy collision of principles must be settled by the legislator. In my opinion the so-called ‘sample provisions of KIGT’ means the legislative settlement. Gift taxtion which is based only upon § 2 Ⅲ KIGT is prohibited. The legislator must do his best to give more transparency and predictability to tax payers. Comprehensive taxation sets a limit on the rule of law. Type-making is also limited in a reasonable boundary of a social consensus. In 2013 the trend of comprehensive taxation is more consolidated. It is time to make an in-depth study on comprehensive gift taxation.

Abstract

This article aims at the current legal issues on gift taxation in Korea. Gift taxation is very dramatically increasing in Korea. In 2005 Korea has introduced a fully comprehensive gift tax in korean Inheritance and Gift tax(KIGT) law. The legislative purpose was to prevent an anomalous shift of wealth without cost. But fully comprehensive taxation can violate the principle of substantial legislated taxation. And also it can incapacitate the principle of proportionality. According to Dworkin and Alexy collision of principles must be settled by the legislator. In my opinion the so-called ‘sample provisions of KIGT’ means the legislative settlement. Gift taxtion which is based only upon § 2 Ⅲ KIGT is prohibited. The legislator must do his best to give more transparency and predictability to tax payers. Comprehensive taxation sets a limit on the rule of law. Type-making is also limited in a reasonable boundary of a social consensus. In 2013 the trend of comprehensive taxation is more consolidated. It is time to make an in-depth study on comprehensive gift taxation.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 강인애, "조세법연구(Ⅰ)" (2006), 한일조세연구소
  2. 국세청, "개정세법해설", ~ (2004)
  3. 권은민, "조세실무연구 III" (2012), 김앤장
  4. 박훈, "완전포괄주의 적용의 의의와 한계 – 증여재산가액 계산의 일반원칙 도입을중심으로", 대법원 특별실무연구회 2013년 9월 발표회 발표문 (2013)
  5. 박요찬, "상속세 및 증여세법의 완전포괄증여규정과 개별예시규정을 중심으로 한 해석론", 조세법연구, 17(1), pp.386~422 (2011), 한국세법학회
  6. 박종수, "세법상 유형화·포괄화의 정당성과 한계", 조세법연구, 10(2), pp.128~160 (2004), 한국세법학회
  7. 박종수, "수용관련 보상금에 대한 과세의 헌법적 문제점- 양도소득과세를 중심으로 -", 법학논고, (29), pp.221~256 (2008), 법학연구원
  8. 유철형, "완전포괄주의 증여세제의 실태와 개선방안", 변호사, 39 (2009), 서울지방변호사회
  9. 이동식, "포괄주의조세입법의 헌법적 쟁점", 조세법연구, 14(3), pp.222~262 (2008), 한국세법학회
  10. 이전오, "증여세 완전포괄주의 규정의 문제점", 조세연구, 4 (2004), 한국조세연구포럼
  11. 한만수, "조세법강의 신정9판(2013년도판)" (2013), 박영사
  12. 임승순, "조세법" (2005), 박영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)