부산광역시 정신의료기관 적정성 평가지표 실태
Status of Medical Care Psychiatric Quality Assesment in Busan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The study aimed to compare the indicators of infrastructure of the whole country with those of Busan through National Medical Care Psychiatric (hospital level) Quality Assesment and to provide the basic evidence for presenting vision and strategies of mental health policy. Methods: National Medical Care Psychiatric (hospital level) Quality Assesment Data was used from 2011 to 2015. A total of 8 indicators were analyzed including facility and workforce. Results: The median value of the capacity per ward was decreasing with years both whole country and Busan. The number of beds out of total inpatient occupancy was improved over the years. There was no clear change in the number of inpatients per toilet in the hospitalized ward, but the indicator was decreasing obviously. Therefore, the median value of whole country and Busan was same with 10.2 in 2015. Conclusions: We confirmed that indicators for infrastructure were improving in a generally positive change over the years. The infrastructure is related to the patient-centered treatment environment, and the workforce is related to the quality of care. Therefore, the structural area should be continuously evaluated and improved.
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to compare the indicators of infrastructure of the whole country with those of Busan through National Medical Care Psychiatric (hospital level) Quality Assesment and to provide the basic evidence for presenting vision and strategies of mental health policy. Methods: National Medical Care Psychiatric (hospital level) Quality Assesment Data was used from 2011 to 2015. A total of 8 indicators were analyzed including facility and workforce. Results: The median value of the capacity per ward was decreasing with years both whole country and Busan. The number of beds out of total inpatient occupancy was improved over the years. There was no clear change in the number of inpatients per toilet in the hospitalized ward, but the indicator was decreasing obviously. Therefore, the median value of whole country and Busan was same with 10.2 in 2015. Conclusions: We confirmed that indicators for infrastructure were improving in a generally positive change over the years. The infrastructure is related to the patient-centered treatment environment, and the workforce is related to the quality of care. Therefore, the structural area should be continuously evaluated and improved.
참고문헌 (10)
- J.P. Hong, "The Survey of Mental Disorders in Korea", pp.5~ (2017), Ministry of Health & Welfare
- WHO, "The Global Burden of Disease 2004Update", pp.49~50 (2008), 49-50
- "National Health Insurance Service" (2015)[URL]
- WHO, "Mental Health : Action Plan 2013-2020", pp.9~ (2013), WHO(World Health Organization)
- J. A. Jeon, "Recent Changes in Mental Health Policy in Korea", Health Welfare Forum, 246(6), pp.51~63 (2017)
- 최정규, "국내 정신보건시설의 재원기간과 관련된 정신사회적 요인", 신경정신의학, 52(2), pp.98~107 (2013), 대한신경정신의학회
- "The National Mental Health and Welfare Commission Annual Report" (2014)[URL]
- 곽찬영, "의료기관 종별에 따른 간병인 관리 현황 및 문제점", Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 15(2), pp.827~839 (2013), 한국자료분석학회
- W. Chung, "The Influence of Institutional Characteristics on Length of Stay for Psychiatric Patients: a National Database Study in South Korea", Social Science & Medicine, 68(6), pp.1137~1144 (2009)
- 신권철, "시설수용과 탈시설의 법원리― 강제입원제도를 중심으로 ―", 서울법학, 26(2), pp.135~183 (2018), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소[DOI]
