共謀共同正犯をめぐる議論の展開
Current discussion about the conspiratorial Co-principal liability in Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
日本の判例理論においては、犯行計画の立案等において重要な関与をなしたが、実行行為を分担してない関与者を共謀共同正犯として処罰することが認められており、学説においても、これを承認する見解が通説的な見解となっている。本稿は、共謀共同正犯をめぐる日本の判例・学説の動向を紹介し、理論的な検討を加えるものである。
Abstract
Article 60 of the Japanese Penal Code provides: Two or more person who act jointly in the perpetration of a crime are all principals (Co-principal). Co-principal criminality rests on joint perpetration of crimes basically. In this Context, the matter of so-called conspiratorial co-principal (co-principal criminality based on Conspiracy) needs special consideration. The Precedents of Japanese Supreme Court has supported the doctrine of the Co-principal based on Conspiracy. The recent trend of scholarly opinion has been also to support the precedent after the long discussion. Nevertheless, it is not so clear, to what extent a conspirator is punishable as Co-principal, who participates only in the Conspiracy, not directly in the act of crimes. This essay is intended to introduce the present Discussion about the Co-principal based on Conspiracy in japan.
참고문헌 (6)
- 小林充, , 法曹時報, 51 (1999)
- 亀井源太郎, "正犯と共犯を区別すること", 2005
- 島田聡一郎, "理論刑法学の探究③" (2010)
- 西田典之, "共犯理論の展開" (2011)
- 松原芳博, "共謀共同正犯論の現在", 法曹時報, 63(7) (2011)
- 山口厚, "理論刑法学の最前線" (2001)