본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Approaching legal response for the duty to prevent transboundary air pollution in South Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article evaluates exploring legal responses to transboundary air pollution. Among the many relevant lessons the Trail Smelter has for environmental governance in Northeast Asia, the first and foremost point is that it used the law to confront the transboundary air pollution problem. I will overview the past history, the present statutory structure, and the future challenges of Korean environmental law. Because Korea is one of “the incumbent economic leaders of developing Asia,” its development efforts are illustrative of “the pitfalls and tradeoffs awaiting developing nations as they attempt to nurture a growing economy without poisoning the environment.” Lessons from Korea’s experience may help prevent developing countries from repeating the same mistakes Korea has made. Finally, I would like to suggest some additional concepts that could guide negotiators in setting the form of the treaty. First, wherever possible, the agreement should leverage co-benefits. Co-benefits exist when objectives of more than one policy can be satisfied with a single measure. Secondly, a transboundary air pollution treaty should concentrate on early adoption of clean energy investment in Asia rather than end-of-the-pipe control. Finally, any agreement should be consistent with the ideal of green growth, namely the creation of economic value through environmentally protective actions. For example, the treaty could enhance intra-country investment and trade in emission reduction technologies and processes and renewable energy by incorporating a commitment to lower barriers to trade and investment in these technologies. Market mechanisms such as regional emissions trading for sulfur dioxide or mutual recognition of renewable energy credits could also be considered.

Abstract

This article evaluates exploring legal responses to transboundary air pollution. Among the many relevant lessons the Trail Smelter has for environmental governance in Northeast Asia, the first and foremost point is that it used the law to confront the transboundary air pollution problem. I will overview the past history, the present statutory structure, and the future challenges of Korean environmental law. Because Korea is one of “the incumbent economic leaders of developing Asia,” its development efforts are illustrative of “the pitfalls and tradeoffs awaiting developing nations as they attempt to nurture a growing economy without poisoning the environment.” Lessons from Korea’s experience may help prevent developing countries from repeating the same mistakes Korea has made. Finally, I would like to suggest some additional concepts that could guide negotiators in setting the form of the treaty. First, wherever possible, the agreement should leverage co-benefits. Co-benefits exist when objectives of more than one policy can be satisfied with a single measure. Secondly, a transboundary air pollution treaty should concentrate on early adoption of clean energy investment in Asia rather than end-of-the-pipe control. Finally, any agreement should be consistent with the ideal of green growth, namely the creation of economic value through environmentally protective actions. For example, the treaty could enhance intra-country investment and trade in emission reduction technologies and processes and renewable energy by incorporating a commitment to lower barriers to trade and investment in these technologies. Market mechanisms such as regional emissions trading for sulfur dioxide or mutual recognition of renewable energy credits could also be considered.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Alexandre Kiss, , International Environmental Law, 45 (2000)
  2. Craig Hart, "East Asia Clean Development Mechanism:Engaging East Asian Countries in Sustainable Development and Climate Regulation through CDM", GEO. INT‘L ENVTL. L. REV, 20, pp.645~676 (2008)
  3. Cormac Cullinan, "Integrated Coastal Manageme Nt Law: Establis Hing And Strengthening National Legal Frame Works For Integrated Coastal Manageme Nt", pp.50~ (2006)
  4. Daniel C. Esty, "Revitalizing Environmental Federalism", Mich. L. Rev, 95, pp.570~627 (1996)
  5. Richard L. Revesz, "Federalism and Interstate Environmental Externalities", U. Pa. L. Rev., 144, pp.2341~2343 (1996)
  6. John Knox, "Transboundary Harm in International Law: Lessons from the Trail Smelter Arbitration" (2006)
  7. J.H.H. Weiler, "The Transformation of Europe", Yale L.J., 100, pp.2403~2422 (1991)
  8. John H. Knox, "The Myth and Reality of Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment", AM. J. INT’L L, 96, pp.291~293 (2002)
  9. Jonathan Iversen, "Transboundary Air Pollution: Moving Toward International Consensus", COLO. J. INT’L ENVTL. L. & POL’Y, 13, pp.161~169 (2002)
  10. Joint Rese Arch Project For Long-Range Transb Oundary Air Pollutants In Northeast Asia, Summary Report of the 4th stage (2013-2017) LTP Project 8, , ~ (2019)
  11. Jason Morrison, "The Oxford Handbook Of International Environme Ntal Law 1" (2008)
  12. Kirk Smith, "Co-benefits of Climate Mitigation and Health Protection in Energy Systems: Scoping Methods", Ann. Rev. Public Health, 11, pp.21~ (2008)
  13. Kim Yeon-Joo, "More Than 30% of Ultra Fine Dust in S. Korea Came From China: Tripartite Study, Pulse By Maei L Bus", News Korea, ~ (2019)
  14. 김상규, "월경성 환경오염문제에 관한 한중 인식 차이와 협력 분석: 평화적 갈등 해결 논의를 중심으로", 평화학연구, 19(1), pp.253~277 (2018), 사단법인 한국평화연구학회
  15. Matthew A. Shapiro, "Transboundary Air Pollution in South Korea: An Analysis of Media Frames and Public Attitudes and Behavior", E. ASIAN COMMUNITY REV, 107, pp.110~ (2018)
  16. Min-Jung Chung, "International Law-Related Resolutions of the 20th National Assembly with a Focus on Territorial Sovereignty and International Environmental Law", S. KOR. Y.B. OF INT’L L, 6, pp.313~317 (2018)
  17. Michael P. Vandenbergh, "Private Environmental Governance", CORNELL L. REV, 99, pp.129~160 (2013)
  18. Neil Craik, "Subsidiary Decision Making under the Espoo Convention: Legal Status and Legitimacy", REV. EUR. COMP . & INT’L ENVTL. L, 20, pp.258~260 (2011)
  19. Noah D. Hall, "Transboundary Pollution: Harmonizing International and Domestic Law", U. Mich. J.L. Reform, 40, pp.681~ (2007)
  20. Nurhidayah, L., "The influence of international law upon ASEAN approaches in addressing transboundary haze pollution in Southeast Asia", Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 37(2), pp.183~210 (2015)
  21. Richard A. Wegman, "The Challenge of Cleaning Up Military Wastes When U.S. Bases Are Closed", Ecology L.Q, 21, pp.865~943 (1994)
  22. Richard J. Ferris, Jr, "Aspiration and Reality in Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea, and Singapore:An Introduction to the Environmental Regulatory Systems of Asia’s Four New Dragons", Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L, 4, pp.125~128 (1993)
  23. Robert V. Percival, "Environmental Federalism: Historical Roots and Contemporary Models", Md. L. Rev., 54, pp.1141~ (1995)
  24. Robert W. Hahn, "The Internationalization of Environmental Regulation", Harv. Int’l L.J, 30, pp.421~427 (1989)
  25. Robert V. Percival, "Environmental Federalism: Historical Roots and Contemporary Models", Md. L. Rev, 54, pp.1141~ (1995)
  26. Robert W. Hahn, "The Internationalization of Environmental Regulation", Harv. Int’l L.J, 30, pp.421~427 (1989)
  27. Steve Charnovitz, "The NAFTA Environmental Side Agreement: Implications for Environmental Cooperation, Trade Policy, and American Treatymaking", Temp. Int’l & Comp. L.J, 8, pp.257~271 (1994)
  28. "S. Kor. Meteorological Admin", pp.21~ (2018), Korea Meteorological Administration
  29. "S. Kor. Meteorological Admin", pp.21~25 (2018), Korea Meteorological Administration
  30. Shin, G, "Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics:The US-Republic of Korea case", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(3), pp.1~21 (2016)
  31. Policy measures for mitigating fine particle pollution in Korea and suggestions for expediting international dialogue in East Asia, "Shim, C", JICA-RI, 1~31 (2017)
  32. Tilt, B., "Review: China’s air pollution crisis: Science and policy perspectives", Environmental Science & Policy, 92, pp.275~280 (2019)
  33. UNESCAP, "Review of programme planning and implementation transboundary air pollution in North-East Asia", Twenty-second Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, ~ (2018)
  34. Laura S. Henry, "From Smelter Fumes to Silk Road Winds: Exploring Responses to Transboundary Air Pollution over South Korea", WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV, 11, pp.565~567 (2012)
  35. Yulia Yamineva, "Is Law Failing to Address Air Pollution? Reflections on International and EU Developments", REV. EUR. COMP . & INT’L ENVTL L, 26, pp.189~198 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)