영유아 온라인 건강정보의 질 평가
Quality Evaluation of Online Health Information Related to Young Child
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was to evaluate the quality of online health information related to infants and preschoolers accessible through mobile applications and websites. Methods: Using combinations of the terms ‘infant’, ‘preschooler’, and ‘health’ as the main keyword or categories, the researchers searched relevant mobile applications and websites in Korean application markets and popular search engines. Twelve mobile application and 14 websites were finally selected according to our inclusion criteria and evaluated using DISCERN instrument. Results: The overall quality score of online health information available through mobile applications was 2.00 of 5 points, the reliability score was 2.15, and the quality score was 1.76. The overall quality score of online health information available through websites was 2.29, the reliability score was 2.40, and the quality score was 1.82. Conclusion: The quality of online health information related to young children was found to be low and to have potentially significant drawbacks according to DISCERN criteria. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a system to evaluate and regulate the quality of online health information. Additionally, factors that readers can use to judge the quality of health information, such as references and the benefit versus risks of the information, should be provided.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was to evaluate the quality of online health information related to infants and preschoolers accessible through mobile applications and websites. Methods: Using combinations of the terms ‘infant’, ‘preschooler’, and ‘health’ as the main keyword or categories, the researchers searched relevant mobile applications and websites in Korean application markets and popular search engines. Twelve mobile application and 14 websites were finally selected according to our inclusion criteria and evaluated using DISCERN instrument. Results: The overall quality score of online health information available through mobile applications was 2.00 of 5 points, the reliability score was 2.15, and the quality score was 1.76. The overall quality score of online health information available through websites was 2.29, the reliability score was 2.40, and the quality score was 1.82. Conclusion: The quality of online health information related to young children was found to be low and to have potentially significant drawbacks according to DISCERN criteria. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a system to evaluate and regulate the quality of online health information. Additionally, factors that readers can use to judge the quality of health information, such as references and the benefit versus risks of the information, should be provided.
참고문헌 (30)
- [URL]
- [URL]
- Sethuram R, "Health information on the internet", Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 30(2), pp.119~121 (2010)[DOI]
- BinDhim NF, "A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps", Telemedicine and E-Health, 21(2), pp.97~104 (2015)[DOI]
- Bert F, "Smartphones and health promotion: A review of the evidence", Journal of Medical Systems, 38(1), pp.9995~ (2014)[DOI]
- Scullard P, "Googling children's health: Reliability of medical advice on the internet", Archives of Disease in Child, 95(8), pp.580~582 (2010)[DOI]
- Quintana Y, "Preventive health information on the internet. qualitative study of consumers' perspectives", Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien, 47(9), pp.1759~1765 (2001)
- Walsh A, "Influences on parents' fever management: Beliefs, experiences and information sources", Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(12), pp.2331~2340 (2007)[DOI]
- Yoo KH, "The educational needs of a mother when nurturing children", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 30(4), pp.905~916 (2000)[DOI]
- 김신정, "아동 부모의 스마트폰 기반 건강교육에 대한 요구도 조사", Child Health Nursing Research, 22(4), pp.346~354 (2016), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- Khoo K, "Health information seeking by parents in the internet age", Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 44(7-8), pp.419~423 (2008)[DOI]
- Pehora C, "Are parents getting it right? a survey of parents' internet use for children's health care information", Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 4(2), pp.1~15 (2015)[DOI]
- Betsch C, "The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks", Journal of Health Psychology, 15(3), pp.446~455 (2010)[DOI]
- Kata A, "Anti-vaccine activists, web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm-an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the antivaccination movement", Vaccine, 30(25), pp.3778~3789 (2012)[DOI]
- Kang BC, "The challenge left for us by Anaki", Healthcare Policy Forum, 15(3), pp.8~14 (2017)
- 정용선, "아동발열관리에 대한 인터넷 정보의 평가", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 12(12), pp.702~713 (2012), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 김복기, "성조숙증에 관한 인터넷 웹사이트 평가 및 분석", Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology & Metabolism, 17(1), pp.27~32 (2012), 대한소아내분비학회[DOI]
- 한경자, "인터넷 육아정보 제공 사이트에 대한 평가", Child Health Nursing Research, 12(1), pp.57~64 (2006), 한국아동간호학회
- Ademiluyi G, "Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the internet", Patient Education and Counseling, 50(2), pp.151~155 (2003)[DOI]
- Charnock D, "DISCERN: An instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices", Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 53(2), pp.105~111 (1999)[DOI]
- 박재현, "DISCERN을 이용한 우리나라 인터넷 건강정보 질 평가", Healthcare Informatics Research, 11(3), pp.235~246 (2005), 대한의료정보학회
- Hunter PV, "Did online publishers "get it right"? using a naturalistic search strategy to review cognitive health promotion content on internet webpages", BioMed Central Geriatrics, 17(1), pp.125~ (2017)[DOI]
- Kiran DP, "Evaluation of health on the net seal label and DISCERN as content quality indicators for patients seeking information about thumb sucking habit", Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences, 7(6), pp.481~485 (2015)[DOI]
- Morahan-Martin JM, "How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review", Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(5), pp.497~510 (2004)[DOI]
- Choi EJ, "Policy development for adolescent mental health promotion", Health and Welfare Policy Forum, pp.78~86 (2012)
- Lewin ME, "America's health care safety net: Revisiting the 2000 IOM report", Health Affairs, 26(5), pp.1490~1494 (2007)[DOI]
- Winker MA, "Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: Principles governing AMA web sites", Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(12), pp.1600~1606 (2000)[DOI]
- Bjelakovic G, "Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: Systematic review and metaanalysis", Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(8), pp.842~857 (2007)[DOI]
- 김진선, "아동의 발열관리: 현황 및 과학적 근거", Child Health Nursing Research, 22(2), pp.126~136 (2016), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- Schiavo R, "Health communication: From theory to practice", pp.33~82 (2013), John Wiley & Sons