사이코패스의 범죄충동과 통제이론- 사이코패스의 특이성과 통제이론적 접근의 한계
Control Theory and Psychopath
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Today, Psychopath is well known to our society for its sensational crimes, for example, its horrible serial killing without mercy. Generally psychopath is different from psycho, because the former could know the meaning and result of his own behaviour, so to speak, the right and wrong unlikely to the latter. So most people think that psychopath criminals should be sentenced to imprisonment or death penalty just as non-psychopath criminals. Moreover, they argue that the psychopath repeat offender should be punished gravely. But is it right treatment that psychopath should be punished gravely or samely just as non-psychopath criminals? Generally, psychopath has no self-control ability to suppress the impulse to crime. At this point, the Control Theory which sets forth as a premise that all men could commit a crime and the absence of self-control ability to suppress the impulse to crime is the cause of crime, might explain the mechanism of committing a crime of psychopath. But this essay argues that the Control Theory cannot apply to psychopath directly because it was designed to explain cause of committing or suppressing a crime of non-psychopathic, namely normal criminal. There are so may Control Theories such as Abert J. Reiss's control theory, Ivan Nye's social control theory, Walter Reckless's containment theory, David Matza's neutalization theory and drift theory, Travis Hirshci's social control theory, and general theory of crime, etc. Among them, Abert J. Reiss's control theory and Ivan Nye's social control theory could not apply to psychopath, their premise that social control can suppress the impulse to crime is not applicable to psychopath, because psychopath has no conscience to internalize the social rules. Also the Walter Reckless's containment theory, Travis Hirshci's social control theory, and general theory of crime are not applicable to psychopath because, they focus on social bonds and family's attachment as causes of suppressing the impulse to crime, but psychopath has been proved to be free from the elements of social bonds. In conclusion, different ways of criminal policy should be set up, for psychopath is different from other normal non-psycopathic criminals in personality.
Abstract
Today, Psychopath is well known to our society for its sensational crimes, for example, its horrible serial killing without mercy. Generally psychopath is different from psycho, because the former could know the meaning and result of his own behaviour, so to speak, the right and wrong unlikely to the latter. So most people think that psychopath criminals should be sentenced to imprisonment or death penalty just as non-psychopath criminals. Moreover, they argue that the psychopath repeat offender should be punished gravely. But is it right treatment that psychopath should be punished gravely or samely just as non-psychopath criminals? Generally, psychopath has no self-control ability to suppress the impulse to crime. At this point, the Control Theory which sets forth as a premise that all men could commit a crime and the absence of self-control ability to suppress the impulse to crime is the cause of crime, might explain the mechanism of committing a crime of psychopath. But this essay argues that the Control Theory cannot apply to psychopath directly because it was designed to explain cause of committing or suppressing a crime of non-psychopathic, namely normal criminal. There are so may Control Theories such as Abert J. Reiss's control theory, Ivan Nye's social control theory, Walter Reckless's containment theory, David Matza's neutalization theory and drift theory, Travis Hirshci's social control theory, and general theory of crime, etc. Among them, Abert J. Reiss's control theory and Ivan Nye's social control theory could not apply to psychopath, their premise that social control can suppress the impulse to crime is not applicable to psychopath, because psychopath has no conscience to internalize the social rules. Also the Walter Reckless's containment theory, Travis Hirshci's social control theory, and general theory of crime are not applicable to psychopath because, they focus on social bonds and family's attachment as causes of suppressing the impulse to crime, but psychopath has been proved to be free from the elements of social bonds. In conclusion, different ways of criminal policy should be set up, for psychopath is different from other normal non-psycopathic criminals in personality.
참고문헌 (57)
- Philip G. Zimbardo, "Lucifer Effect", pp.29~ (2007)
- 김선수, "정신병질 범죄자의 처우에 관한 연구", 경남법학, 2, pp.210~219 (1986)
- 로버트 D. 헤어, "PSYCHOPATH 진단명: 사이코패스 ‘우리 주변에 숨어있는 이상인격자’", pp.47~317 (2005)
- General C.Davidson, "Abnormal Psychology(이상심리학), 제7판", pp.256~265 (2000)
- 민성길, "최신정신의학", pp.296~ (1996)
- 권석만, "현대 이상심리학", pp.316~ (2003)
- K. Schneider, "Die Psychopathischen Pörsönlichkeiten" (1950)
- 이수정, "잠재적 범죄위험요인으로서의 정신병질(psychopathy)", 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 10(2), pp.39~77 (2004), 한국문화및사회문제심리학회
- Robert D. Hare, "사이코패스의 전두엽 기능과 관련된 인지론적 작업능력", Journal of Abnormal Psyhology, 93, pp.133~140 (1984)
- S.D. Hart, "남성 사이코패스의 선택적 신경심리검사 결과", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, pp.374~379 (1990)
- J.J. Hoffman, "신경심리검사중 전두엽 기능장애의 “사이코패시” 인격 특성 및 알코올 중독에 대한 상대적 중요성", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, pp.158~160 (1987)
- E.E. Gorenstein, "발산 정신병리학: 연구의 새로운 관점 및 모델", Psyhologiccal Review, 87, pp.301~315 (1980)
- J.P. Newman, "외향적인 사람과 사이코패스 처벌의 반작용: 발산형 인간의 충동적 행동에 내포된 의미", Journal of Research in personality, 21, pp.464~480 (1987)
- A.R Damasio, "전뇌 손상으로 사이코패시 행동을 보이는 개인은 사회적 자극에 대해자율적 반응을 보이지 못한다", Behavioral Brain Research, 41, pp.81~94 (1990)
- 최영인, "사회통제이론과 범죄낙인이론", pp.13~167 (2005), 백산출판사
- Albert J. Reiss, "Delinquency as the Failure of Personal and Social Controls", American Sociological Review, 16, pp.196~207 (1951)
- 전돈수, "범죄학개론", pp.30~218 (2005)
- John McCarthy, "The Dynamics of Self-Esteem and Delinquency", pp.396~410 (1984)
- 민수홍, "여자청소년의 자기통제력이 비행과 범죄에 미치는 영향", 형사정책연구, 13(1), pp.2~66 (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
- 배종대, "형사정책", pp.216~263 (2006)
- 한국형사정책연구원, "가정환경과 청소년비행", pp.100~ (1995)
- 대검찰청, "범죄분석", pp.168~310 (2005)
- 김은주, "연쇄살인범의 범죄심리에 관한 연구 - 유영철 사건을 중심으로", pp.2006
- 정신교, "범죄학개론", pp.134~140 (2005)
- Reckless, W., "A new theory of delinquency and crime, In Federal Probation 25", pp.23~46 (1961)
- Reckless, "Pioneering with Self-Concept as a Vulnerability Factor in Delinquency", pp.515~523 (1967)
- 박철현, "긍정적 자아개념과 청소년 비행-레크레스의 봉쇄이론의 검증", 형사정책연구, 16(1), pp.248~ (2005)
- Robert Regoli, "The Commitment of Delinquents to Their Misdeeds; A Reexamination", pp.261~269 (1978)
- Gresham M. Sykes, "Technique of Neutralization; A Theory of Delinquency", American Sociological Review, 22, pp.664~670 (1957)
- David Matza, "Delinquency and Drift" (1964)
- Michael Hindelang, "The Commitment of Delinquents to their Misdeeds; Do Delinquents Drift?", Social Problem, 17, pp.509~ (1970)
- 이동균, "범죄원인론으로서의 표류이론, In 서울대학교대학원법학과 자료집", pp.2~21 (2006)
- Vold, "범죄학 이론", pp.231~ (2000), 길안사
- 허경미, "현대사회와 범죄", pp.87~88 (2006)
- "조선일보", 1~ (1994)
- "동아일보", 35~ (2000)
- 표창원, "한국의 연쇄살인", pp.314~ (2005)
- "조선일보", 1~ (2004)
- "조선일보", 1~ (1988)
- Robert Agnew, "The Techniques of Neutralization and Violence", Criminology, 32, pp.555~579 (1994)
- Robert Ball, "An Empirical Exploration of Neutralization Theory", Criminology, 4, pp.22~32 (1966)
- 박신자, "심리학의 이해", pp.246~ (2005), 형설출판사
- Jackson Toby, "Social Disorganization and Stake in Conformity; Complementary Factors in the Predatory Behavior of Hoodlums", Journal of Criminal Law, pp.12~17 (1957)
- 이상안, "범죄경제학", pp.94~ (1999), 박영사
- Travis Hirschi, "Causes of Delinquency", pp.97~161 (1969)
- 김준호, "가족의 구조 및 기능과 반사회적 행동", 한국형사정책연구, 7(1), pp.109~ (1996)
- 법무연수원, "범죄백서", pp.119~ (2005)
- 이성식, "가정과 청소년비행: 주요 이론들의 매개과정을 통한 검증", 형사정책연구, 14(3), pp.6~207 (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 한국형사정책연구원, "가정환경과 청소년 비행", pp.99~ (1995), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이동원, "청소년비행에 있어서 허쉬의 사회통제이론의 확장", 한국청소년연구, pp.98~ (1997)
- 한국형사정책연구원, "청소년의 긴장과 비행", pp.141~ (1996), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김준호, "청소년비행의 원인에 관한 연구; 공부에 대한 압력을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 1, pp.36~ (1990)
- Michael Gottfredson, "A General Theory of Crime" (1990), Stanford Univ. Press
- 김현택, "심리학", pp.224~ (1999), 학지사
- 이선욱, "A General Theory of Crime, In 서울대학교대학원법학과자료집", pp.17~21 (2006)
- 김선희, "자기통제력과 청소년비행에 대한 연구", pp.2002
- 이재상, "형법총론", pp.617~ (2006)