평생의학교육의 의사-제약회사 관계
Physician-industry Relationships in Continuing Medical Education
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Physicians have both an ethical obligation and a right to participate in continuing medical education (CME) programs to constantly maintain and upgrade their knowledge and skills after the completion of their formal education. CME is the pharmaceutical industry’s most important marketing tool. CME is increasingly being funded by the pharmaceutical industry; currently the financial support from drug and device companies accounts for up to 60% of the costs of all accredited CME programs in the U.S. CME requirements for Korean physicians are somewhat lax at the present time, but industry sponsored CME is on the rise in Korea. With the increase in industry funded CME, there is cause for concern about potential conflicts of interest, scientific biases, and the educational quality of industry-funded CME. Physicians’ reliance on industry-funded CME has the potential to influence negatively their clinical decisions and to increase spending on prescription drugs. For these reasons, a growing number of medical institutions in the U.S. have limited or phased-out industry sponsorship of CME at their institutions. This article argues that in order to ensure the professional integrity of physicians and the process of learning in CME, physicians and pharmaceutical industries need more explicit codes of conduct and guidelines. Individual doctors should recognize the potential for the industry to influence their prescribing habits and follow the ethical principles of physician-industry relationships. Also, in order to better balance learning needs and patient concerns, physicians should have the information and skills required to make informed decisions in CME.
Abstract
Physicians have both an ethical obligation and a right to participate in continuing medical education (CME) programs to constantly maintain and upgrade their knowledge and skills after the completion of their formal education. CME is the pharmaceutical industry’s most important marketing tool. CME is increasingly being funded by the pharmaceutical industry; currently the financial support from drug and device companies accounts for up to 60% of the costs of all accredited CME programs in the U.S. CME requirements for Korean physicians are somewhat lax at the present time, but industry sponsored CME is on the rise in Korea. With the increase in industry funded CME, there is cause for concern about potential conflicts of interest, scientific biases, and the educational quality of industry-funded CME. Physicians’ reliance on industry-funded CME has the potential to influence negatively their clinical decisions and to increase spending on prescription drugs. For these reasons, a growing number of medical institutions in the U.S. have limited or phased-out industry sponsorship of CME at their institutions. This article argues that in order to ensure the professional integrity of physicians and the process of learning in CME, physicians and pharmaceutical industries need more explicit codes of conduct and guidelines. Individual doctors should recognize the potential for the industry to influence their prescribing habits and follow the ethical principles of physician-industry relationships. Also, in order to better balance learning needs and patient concerns, physicians should have the information and skills required to make informed decisions in CME.
참고문헌 (18)
- Adriane Fugh-Berman, "Testimony submitted to the Senate Committee on Aging", ~
- AMA Council on Medical Education, "Current status of continuing medical education", Conn Med, 45, pp.783~791 (1981)
- "AMA HOD and the Council on Medical Education. HOD policy #300.988", ~
- Industry Funding of Medical Education. Report of an AAMC Task Force, "Association of American Medical Colleges", ~ (2008)
- Campbell EG, "A national survey of physician-industry relationships", NEJM, 356, pp.1742~1750 (2007)
- Davis DA, "CME and the pharmaceutical industry: two worlds, three views, four steps", CMAJ, 171, pp.149~151 (2004)
- Heckelman W, "WLH Consulting. CME and PHARMA: The Value of Pharma-Supported CME", ~ (2010)
- "KRPIA 실무운용지침 제2조 기본원칙", ~
- Mansouri M, "A meta-analysis of continuing medical education effectiveness", J Contin Educ Health Prof, 1, pp.6~15 (2007)
- Paul RL, "CME, physicians, and Pavlov: Can we change what happens when industry rings the bell?", Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, 106, pp.39~45 (2008)
- Shepherd GR, "History of continuation medical education in United States since 1930", J Med Educ, 35, pp.740~758 (1960)
- Spurling GK, "Information from pharmaceutical companies and the quality, quantity, and cost of physicians’ prescribing: a systematic review", PLoS Medicine, 7(10), pp.e1000352~ (2010)
- Vollan DD, "Objectives and content of postgraduate medical education", JAMA, 13, pp.1119~1125 (1955)
- "대한의사협회 연수교육시행규정 제1조(목적)", ~
- 이윤성, "007 살인면허", 한국의학교육, 22(2), pp.89~90 (2010), 한국의학교육학회
- 이일학, "의료인-제약산업 관계의 이해상충과 윤리적 원칙", 한국의료윤리학회지, 14(2), pp.193~201 (2011), 한국의료윤리학회
- "한국제약협회(KPMA) 공정경쟁규약 세부운용기준, 한국다국적의약산업협회(KRPIA) 세부운용기준", ~
