스펙트로그램을 이용한 내전형 연축성 발성 장애와 근긴장성 발성 장애의 감별
Differentiation of Adductor-Type Spasmodic Dysphonia from Muscle Tension Dysphonia Using Spectrogram
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives Adductor type spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD) is neurogenic disorder and focal laryngeal dystonia, while muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is caused by functional voice disorder. Both ADSD and MTD may be associated with excessive supraglottic contraction and compensation, resulting in a strained voice quality with spastic voice breaks. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of spectrogram analysis in the differentiation of ADSD from MTD. Materials and Methods From 2015 through 2017, 17 patients of ADSD and 20 of MTD, underwent acoustic recording and phonatory function studies, were enrolled. Jitter (frequency perturbation), Shimmer (amplitude perturbation) were obtained using MDVP (Multi-dimensional Voice Program) and GRBAS scale was used for perceptual evaluation. The two speech therapist evaluated a wide band (11,250 Hz) spectrogram by blind test using 4 scales (0-3 point) for four spectral findings, abrupt voice breaks, irregular wide spaced vertical striations, well defined formants and high frequency spectral noise. Results Jitter, Shimmer and GRBAS were not found different between two groups with no significant correlation (p＞0.05). Abrupt voice breaks and irregular wide spaced vertical striations of ADSD were significantly higher than those of MTD with strong correlation (p＜0.01). High frequency spectral noise of MTD were higher than those of ADSD with strong correlation (p＜0.01). Well defined formants were not found different between two groups. Conclusion The wide band spectrograms provided visual perceptual information can differentiate ADSD from MTD. Spectrogram analysis is a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating ADSD from MTD where perceptual analysis and clinical evaluation alone are insufficient.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Adductor type spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD) is neurogenic disorder and focal laryngeal dystonia, while muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is caused by functional voice disorder. Both ADSD and MTD may be associated with excessive supraglottic contraction and compensation, resulting in a strained voice quality with spastic voice breaks. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of spectrogram analysis in the differentiation of ADSD from MTD. Materials and Methods From 2015 through 2017, 17 patients of ADSD and 20 of MTD, underwent acoustic recording and phonatory function studies, were enrolled. Jitter (frequency perturbation), Shimmer (amplitude perturbation) were obtained using MDVP (Multi-dimensional Voice Program) and GRBAS scale was used for perceptual evaluation. The two speech therapist evaluated a wide band (11,250 Hz) spectrogram by blind test using 4 scales (0-3 point) for four spectral findings, abrupt voice breaks, irregular wide spaced vertical striations, well defined formants and high frequency spectral noise. Results Jitter, Shimmer and GRBAS were not found different between two groups with no significant correlation (p＞0.05). Abrupt voice breaks and irregular wide spaced vertical striations of ADSD were significantly higher than those of MTD with strong correlation (p＜0.01). High frequency spectral noise of MTD were higher than those of ADSD with strong correlation (p＜0.01). Well defined formants were not found different between two groups. Conclusion The wide band spectrograms provided visual perceptual information can differentiate ADSD from MTD. Spectrogram analysis is a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating ADSD from MTD where perceptual analysis and clinical evaluation alone are insufficient.
참고문헌 (15)
- Aronson AE, "Spastic dysphonia. II. Comparison with essential (voice) tremor and other neurologic and psychogenic dysphonias", Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 33(3), pp.219~231 (1968)
- Schaefer SD, "Neuropathology of spasmodic dysphonia", The Laryngoscope, 93(9), pp.1183~1204 (1983)
- Blitzer A, "Botulinum toxin management of spasmodic dysphonia (laryngeal dystonia): a 12-year experience in more than 900 patients", The Laryngoscope, 108(10), pp.1435~1441 (1998)
- Morrison MD, "Muscular tension dysphonia", The Journal of Otolaryngology, 12(5), pp.302~306 (1983)
- Roy N, "Muscle tension dysphonia and spasmodic dysphonia: the role of manual laryngeal tension reduction in diagnosis and management", Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 105(11), pp.851~856 (1996)
- Van Houtte E, "Pathophysiology and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia: a review of the current knowledge", Journal of Voice, 25(2), pp.202~207 (2011)
- Siemons-Lühring DI, "Spasmodic dysphonia, perceptual and acoustic analysis: presenting new diagnostic tools", European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 266(12), pp.1915~ (2009)
- Rees CJ, "Differentiation of adductor-type spasmodic dysphonia from muscle tension dysphonia by spectral analysis", Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 137(4), pp.576~581 (2007)
- 이현화, "스펙트로그램을 통한 내전형 연축성 발성장애와 근긴장성 발성장애의 특성연구", 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학, 58(7), pp.481~486 (2015), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Houtz DR, "Differential diagnosis of muscle tension dysphonia and adductor spasmodic dysphonia using spectral moments of the long-term average spectrum", The Laryngoscope, 120(4), pp.749~757 (2010)
- Cannito MP, "The spasmodic dysphonias. Voice quality measurement", pp.411~430 (2000), Singular Publishing Group
- Aronson AE, "Adductor spastic dysphonia: 1 1", 2 years after recurrent laryngeal nerve resection, 1981, pp.90(1), 2~6
- Hirano M, "“GRBAS” scale for evaluating the hoarse voice & frequency range of phonation", Clinical Examination of Voice, 5, pp.83~84 (1981)
- Klingholz F, "Quantitative spectral evaluation of shimmer and jitter", J Speech Hear Res, 28(2), pp.169~174 (1985)
- Brockmann M, "Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task", Journal of Voice, 25(1), pp.44~53 (2011)