일측성 성대마비 환자에서 내전형 갑상성형술, 피열연골 내전술, 피열연골내전술과 성대주입술 병행치료의 음성 결과 비교
Comparison of Voice Outcomes between Medialization Thyroplasty and Arytenoid Adduction with or without Injection Laryngoplasty in Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis Patients
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives In unilateral vocal fold paralysis (VFP), medialization thyroplasty (MT), arytenoid adduction (AA) and injection layrngoplasty (IL) are the most common procedures to correct phonatory problems. There is no consensus that which procedure is superior to the other for correcting the glottal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to compare the phonatory parameters between MT, AA and AA with IL (AA+IL) in patients with unilateral VFP. Materials and Methods This retrospective study enrolled patients from 2005 to 2016. Total 72 patients (49 male, 23 female, mean age 54.5 years) were classified into three groups ; MT (n=28), AA (n=12), and AA+IL (n=32). GRBAS scales, maximum phonation time (MPT), jitter, shimmer, noise to harmonic ratio (NHR), and voice handicap index (VHI)-10 and VHI-30 were preoperatively and postoperatively collected and compared between the three groups. Results Age, gender and cause of VFP were not significantly different between the three groups. In MT and AA groups, MPT, VHI, G (overall grade) and B (breathiness) were significantly improved. In AA+IL group, jitter, shimmer, NHR, MPT, VHI, G and B were significantly improved. In analysis of differences (pre-postoperative values), Δ jitter (p＜0.001), Δ shimmer (p=0.031), and Δ NHR (p=0.002) were significantly different and AA+IL group showed the greatest improvement. Conclusion Analysis of voice parameters showed that all the three procedures for patients with unilateral VFP are effective in the improvement of voice ; especially in MPT, VHI-10, G and B scales. Compared to the others, AA+IL provided the better acoustic values including jitter, shimmer and NHR.
Abstract
Background and Objectives In unilateral vocal fold paralysis (VFP), medialization thyroplasty (MT), arytenoid adduction (AA) and injection layrngoplasty (IL) are the most common procedures to correct phonatory problems. There is no consensus that which procedure is superior to the other for correcting the glottal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to compare the phonatory parameters between MT, AA and AA with IL (AA+IL) in patients with unilateral VFP. Materials and Methods This retrospective study enrolled patients from 2005 to 2016. Total 72 patients (49 male, 23 female, mean age 54.5 years) were classified into three groups ; MT (n=28), AA (n=12), and AA+IL (n=32). GRBAS scales, maximum phonation time (MPT), jitter, shimmer, noise to harmonic ratio (NHR), and voice handicap index (VHI)-10 and VHI-30 were preoperatively and postoperatively collected and compared between the three groups. Results Age, gender and cause of VFP were not significantly different between the three groups. In MT and AA groups, MPT, VHI, G (overall grade) and B (breathiness) were significantly improved. In AA+IL group, jitter, shimmer, NHR, MPT, VHI, G and B were significantly improved. In analysis of differences (pre-postoperative values), Δ jitter (p＜0.001), Δ shimmer (p=0.031), and Δ NHR (p=0.002) were significantly different and AA+IL group showed the greatest improvement. Conclusion Analysis of voice parameters showed that all the three procedures for patients with unilateral VFP are effective in the improvement of voice ; especially in MPT, VHI-10, G and B scales. Compared to the others, AA+IL provided the better acoustic values including jitter, shimmer and NHR.
참고문헌 (12)
- Havas T, "Unilateral vocal fold paralysis: causes, options and outcomes", ANZ Journal of Surgery, 69(7), pp.509~513 (1999)
- Son YI, "Understanding of laryngology. The Korean Society of Laryngology", Phoniatrics and Logopedics (2012)
- Woo P, "Arytenoid adduction and medialization laryngoplasty", Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 33(4), pp.817~839 (2000)
- Lee NJ, "Arytenoid Adduction by Lateral Approach. Journal of The Korean Society of Laryngology", Phoniatrics and Logopedics, 25(2), pp.90~95 (2014)
- Min JY, "Long-term results of Artecoll injection laryngoplasty for patients with unilateral vocal fold motion impairment: safety and clinical efficacy", Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 134(5), pp.490~496 (2008)
- Chester MW, "Arytenoid adduction combined with medialization thyroplasty: an evidence-based review", Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 129(4), pp.305~310 (2003)
- Hoffman MR, "Multiparameter comparison of injection laryngoplasty, medialization laryngoplasty, and arytenoid adduction in an excised larynx model", The Laryngoscope, 120(4), pp.769~776 (2010)
- Lee HJ, "Type I Thyroplasty Using Prefabricated Hydroxylapatite Implant (VoCoM®)", Journal of The Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics, 14(2), pp.117~122 (2003)
- Choi J, "Posterior glottic gap and age as factors predicting voice outcome of injection laryngoplasty in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis", The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 126(3), pp.260~266 (2012)
- Vinson KN, "Injection versus medialization laryngoplasty for the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis", The Laryngoscope, 120(9), pp.1802~1807 (2010)
- Morgan JE, "Injection versus medialization laryngoplasty for the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis", The Laryngoscope, 117(11), pp.2068~2074 (2007)
- Mortensen M, "Arytenoid adduction with medialization laryngoplasty versus injection or medialization laryngoplasty: the role of the arytenoidopexy", The Laryngoscope, 119(4), pp.827~831 (2009)