후두전적출술 후 음성 보형물(Provox®)을 이용한 음성 재활의 장기적 관리
Long-Term Management of Voice Rehabilitation Using Voice Prosthesis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy is of paramount importance for improving quality of life following surgery. Tracheoesophageal voice with a voice prosthesis has been considered the gold standard for voice rehabilitation. The success rate of voice rehabilitation using a voice prosthesis is known to be over 90%. However, voice prostheses require regular replacement. The average lifespan of the device is four to six months. Common reasons for replacement include leakage around or within the prosthesis (endo- or periprosthetic leakage). Adjustments to the prosthesis may be necessary to address these adverse events. Provox® (Atos medical, Sweden) has been one of the most widely used voice prostheses. It offers a range of devices to address various issues. Regular follow-up appointments are essential for monitoring voice quality, identifying and addressing any complications, and providing ongoing support and guidance.
Abstract
Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy is of paramount importance for improving quality of life following surgery. Tracheoesophageal voice with a voice prosthesis has been considered the gold standard for voice rehabilitation. The success rate of voice rehabilitation using a voice prosthesis is known to be over 90%. However, voice prostheses require regular replacement. The average lifespan of the device is four to six months. Common reasons for replacement include leakage around or within the prosthesis (endo- or periprosthetic leakage). Adjustments to the prosthesis may be necessary to address these adverse events. Provox® (Atos medical, Sweden) has been one of the most widely used voice prostheses. It offers a range of devices to address various issues. Regular follow-up appointments are essential for monitoring voice quality, identifying and addressing any complications, and providing ongoing support and guidance.
참고문헌 (11)
- Tang JA, "Voice restoration and quality of life in larynx cancer", Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 56(2), pp.361~370 (2023)
- Kress P, "Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voice prostheses", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 271(1), pp.133~140 (2014)
- Jabbour N, "Protocolized awake secondary tracheoesophageal puncture with immediate voicing", Head Neck, 45(10), pp.2735~2740 (2023)
- Mayo-Yáñez M, "Use of double flange voice prosthesis for periprosthetic leakage in laryngectomised patients : a prospective case-crossover study", Clin Otolaryngol, 45(3), pp.389~393 (2020)
- Mayo-Yáñez M, "Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a magnet-based valve voice prosthesis for endoprosthesis leakage treatment", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 279(8), pp.4167~4172 (2022)
- Talpaert MJ, "Candida biofilm formation on voice prostheses", J Med Microbiol, 64(Pt 3), pp.199~208 (2015)
- Chaukar DA, "Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection : a simple inoffice technique to improve tracheoesophageal speech in postlaryngectomy patients", Head Neck, 35(4), pp.E122~E125 (2013)
- Chone CT, "Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for speech rehabilitation in total laryngectomy : long-term results with indwelling voice prosthesis", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 133(1), pp.89~93 (2005)
- Op de Coul BM, "A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318patients : a single Institution’s experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses", Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 126(11), pp.1320~1328 (2000)
- Zuur JK, "The physiological rationale of heat and moisture exchangers in post-laryngectomy pulmonary rehabilitation : a review", Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 263(1), pp.1~8 (2006)
- Pedemonte-Sarrias G, "Chronic adherence to heat and moisture exchanger use in laryngectomized patients", Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp, 64(4), pp.247~252 (2013)