신용카드 불법할인행위의 형사책임과 대책
Criminal countermeasures to illegal money accommodation by means of credit card
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
신용카드거래를 악용하는 신용카드 불법할인(불법현금융통)은 건전한 신용카드거래를 위협하여 신용카드거래에 대한 공공의 신용을 위태롭게 한다. 나아가 카드할인을 받은 사람을 신용불량자로 전락시켜 사회생활을 거의 불가능하게 하며, 카드할인업자는 사회적으로 허용될 수 없는 부당한 이익을 얻게 된다. 이와 같은 반사회적인 행위를 효과적으로 규율하기 위해 제정된 여신전문금융업법의 카드할인 처벌규정은, 위에서 살펴본 바와 같이, 그 동안의 입법적 보완에도 불구하고 여전히 처벌의 흠결이 존재한다. 이러한 처벌공백을 메워, 현재의 규정에 의해 처벌되는 행위와 실질적으로 동일함에도 불구하고 처벌되지 아니하는 행위를 포섭할 수 있도록 여신전문금융업법 제70조 제2항 제2호를 보완하여야 한다.
Abstract
In this work I will explain the realities and types of illegal money accommodation by means of credit card(Ⅱ), examine the problems of current penal provisions and then propose the revision(Ⅲ) to take effective criminal countermeasures to illegal money accommodation by means of credit card. Illegal money accommodation by means of credit card is defined as loan by abusing a transaction by credit card. Illegal money accommodation by means of credit card(hereinafter referred as “i.m.a.”) is classified 6 types as follows: ①i.m.a. by disguising the sale of goods, provision of services in real space(type 1), ②i.m.a. by purchasing at a reduced price the goods or services procured by a credit card member after having the credit card member procure the goods or services by means of the credit card in real space(type 2), ③i.m.a. by purchasing by proxy the sale of goods, provision of services in real space(type 3), ④i.m.a. by disguising the sale of goods, provision of services in cyberspace(type 4), ⑤i.m.a. by purchasing at a reduced price the goods or services procured by a credit card member after having the credit card member procure the goods or services by means of the credit card in cyberspace(type 5), ⑥i.m.a. by purchasing by proxy the sale of goods, provision of services in cyberspace(type 6). Type 1 and type 4 are punished by Specialized Credit Finance Business Act(hereinafter referred as “SCFBA”) Article 70 (2) 2 (a). And Types of 2 & 5 are punishable by SCFBA Article 70 (2) 2 (b). But if the loaner takes the goods procured by a credit card member as security for loan or does commission sale, he can not be punished by SCFBA Article 70 (2) 2 (b), for the purchase isn't able to include commission sale or taking as security for loan. Finally type 3 & 6 are not be punishable by SCFBA Article 70 (2) 2 (a), (b) or (c). To fill a gap in penal provisions the SCFBA Article 70 (2) 2 (b) is revised and (d) is stipulated as followings: (b) “act to purchase at a reduced price the goods or services procured by a credit card member after having the credit card member procure the goods or services by means of the credit card, to take the goods as security for loan or to sell it on commission”. (d) “act to make a transaction by credit cards by proxy by utilizing credit card or credit card information of a credit card member”.
참고문헌 (13)
- 강동범, "여신전문금융업법상 신용카드의 취득·사용·처분범죄처벌규정의 검토", 법조, 57(3), pp.42~87 (2008), 법조협회
- 금융감독원, "불법금융거래의 유형 및 특성", 2003.12, ~ (2003)
- 금융감독원, "2003.7.24. 보도자료", ~ (2003)
- 오경식, "여신전문금융업법상에 나타난 신용카드범죄에 대한 고찰", 형사정책, (10) (1998)
- 여신금융협회, "신용카드 업계현황", 2012.12, ~ (2012)
- 여신금융협회, "2008.8.13. 보도자료", ~ (2008)
- 여신금융협회, "2010.2.25. 보도자료", ~ (2010)
- 여신금융협회, "2010.8.16. 보도자료", ~ (2010)
- 여신금융협회, "2011.8.8. 보도자료", ~ (2011)
- 여신금융협회, "2012.3.12. 보도자료", ~ (2012)
- 신용카드범죄의 실태와 정책적 대응방안, "정완", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2004)
- 정영진, (1994)
- 조성목, "신용카드불법거래 유형 및 대응방안–불법 신용카드 할인을 중심으로–", 신용카드 (2004), 여신금융협회
