近視의 病因病機에 關한 文獻的 考察
A Study on the Literatures of Oriental Medicine Which Deals with the Treatment Principle on Myopia
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives Myopia is a disease which can be easily found in the child and it considers as a prevalent disease. This study has a reference of the literatures of oriental medicine on the myopia to investigate treatment principles of the myopia. Methods This study is based on the literatures of oriental medicine. Results According to the literatures of oriental medicine, there were two opposite opinions those could cause myopia. One was “lack of Yinqi(陰氣)”, the other was “lack of Yangqi(陽氣)”. Originally many scholars thought that myopia was caused by laking of Yinqi(陰氣). The representative scholar was LiGao(李杲), and his work is Dongwonsunsangsihyobang(東垣先生試效方). But, some scholars insisted the opposite opinions, and the next generations accepted this opinion. The representative scholar was WangHaoGu(王好古), his work was Chasanangi(此事難知). Euihakgangmok(醫學綱目) published conversely the opinion of LiGao(李杲). Therefore, after ages appreciated that LiGao(李杲) and WangHaoGu(王好古) insisted the same opinions-the cause of the myopia was lack of Yangqi(陽氣). So the most latest generation scholars knew that the cause of myopia was lack of Yangqi(陽氣). Conclusions Historically many scholars insisted that myopia was caused by lack of ‘Yangqi(陽氣)’. But that is the result of false transmission through the generation.
Abstract
Objectives Myopia is a disease which can be easily found in the child and it considers as a prevalent disease. This study has a reference of the literatures of oriental medicine on the myopia to investigate treatment principles of the myopia. Methods This study is based on the literatures of oriental medicine. Results According to the literatures of oriental medicine, there were two opposite opinions those could cause myopia. One was “lack of Yinqi(陰氣)”, the other was “lack of Yangqi(陽氣)”. Originally many scholars thought that myopia was caused by laking of Yinqi(陰氣). The representative scholar was LiGao(李杲), and his work is Dongwonsunsangsihyobang(東垣先生試效方). But, some scholars insisted the opposite opinions, and the next generations accepted this opinion. The representative scholar was WangHaoGu(王好古), his work was Chasanangi(此事難知). Euihakgangmok(醫學綱目) published conversely the opinion of LiGao(李杲). Therefore, after ages appreciated that LiGao(李杲) and WangHaoGu(王好古) insisted the same opinions-the cause of the myopia was lack of Yangqi(陽氣). So the most latest generation scholars knew that the cause of myopia was lack of Yangqi(陽氣). Conclusions Historically many scholars insisted that myopia was caused by lack of ‘Yangqi(陽氣)’. But that is the result of false transmission through the generation.
참고문헌 (60)
- "2005년도 학생신체검사 결과"[URL]
- 이민재, "연령변화에 따른 근시의 진행정도", 대한안과학회지, 28(1), pp.151~155 (1987)
- 김승영, "소아 근시 발생연령에 따른 근시 진행", 대한안과학회지, 39(4), pp.99~105 (1998)
- 이하범, "근시의 치료", 대한의사협회지, 41(1), pp.77~86 (1998)
- 김효명, "굴절이상의 종류와 교정", 의약정보, 8, pp.23~25 (1996)
- 박정현, "눈건강과 근시교정-근시교정술을 중심으로", 의약정보, 10, pp.139~143 (1997)
- 최은영, "소아 근시에 대한 임상 연구 고찰-최근 중의학 문헌을 중심으로", 대한한방소아과학회지, 20(2), pp.207~218 (2006)
- 배은희, "近視의 鍼灸治療穴에 관한 문헌적 고찰", 대한침구학회지, 7(1), pp.349~357 (1990)
- 최도영, "近視의 鍼治療에 관한 문헌적 고찰", 대한침구학회지, 8(1), pp.37~46 (1991)
- 최도영, "鍼灸法을 이용하여 치료한 近視에 대한 임상적 연구", 대한동의병리학회지, 13(1), pp.119~123 (1999)
- 이진훈, "소아근시의 침치료 효과에 대한 임상적 연구", 대한외관과학회지, 14(2), pp.253~261 (2001)
- 홍승욱, "근시 환자의 치험 10예", 대한외관과학회지, 9(1), pp.129~135 (1996)
- 국립국어연구원, "표준국어대사전(상)", pp.813~ (2000), 두산동아
- 唐由之, "中醫眼科全書", pp.5~19 (1996), 人民衛生出版社
- 皇甫謐, "鍼灸甲乙經", pp.278~ (1960), 東方書店
- 巢元方, "諸病源侯論", pp.204~ (1992), 대성문화사
- 洪元植, "中國醫學史", pp.116~ (1993), 재단법인 동양의학연구소
- 孫思邈, "千金要方", pp.549~550 (1976), 杏林出版社
- 劉完素, "中國醫學大系12 素問玄機原病式:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.731~732 (1987), 여강출판사
- 張從正, "中國醫學大系13 儒門事親:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.121~ (1987), 여강출판사
- 劉完素, "病機氣宜保命集", pp.267~ (2000), 木과 土
- 楊士瀛, "中國醫學大系12 仁齋直指:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.393~ (1987), 여강출판사
- 陳柱杓, "金元四大家 醫學全書(上)", pp.13~ (2007), 法人文化社
- 동양의학대사전편찬위원회, "동양의학대사전", pp.8~59 (1999)
- 王好古, "此事難知", pp.261~263 (1998), 대성문화사
- 孫思邈, "中國醫學大系3 銀海精微:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.1030~1031 (1987), 여강출판사
- 危亦林, "中國醫學大系14 世醫得效方:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.523~ (1987), 여강출판사
- 倪維德, "中國醫學大系31 原機啓微:薛己. 薛氏醫案:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.213~2214 (1987), 여강출판사
- 徐用誠, "中國醫學大系30 玉機微義:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.373~374 (1987), 여강출판사
- 朱橚, "中國醫學大系15 普濟方:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.143~164 (1987), 여강출판사
- 陳桷, "中國醫學大系33 石山醫案:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.331~ (1987), 여강출판사
- 朱震亨, "丹溪心法附餘", pp.469~ (1993), 大星文化社
- 樓英, "醫學綱目", pp.440~441 (1996), 中國中醫葯出版社
- 李梃, "編註 醫學入門", pp.181~ (1990), 大星文化社
- 龔廷賢, "萬病回春", pp.292~ (1993), 醫聖堂
- 王肯堂, "中國醫學大系35 證治準繩:景印 文淵閣四庫全書", pp.467~468 (1987), 여강출판사
- 趙獻可, "醫貫", pp.70~71 (1993), 圖書出版鼎談
- 張介賓, "景岳全書", pp.519~ (1999), 圖書出版鼎談
- 傳仁宇, "審視瑤函:徐又芳 中醫五官科名著集成", pp.298~300 (1997), 華夏出版社
- 傳仁宇, "審視瑤函:曹炳章 中國醫學大成續集34", pp.442~450 (2000), 上海科學技術出版社
- 陳士鐸, "辨證錄", pp.155~156 (1989), 人民衛生出版社
- 張璐, "張氏醫通", pp.198~199 (1995), 中國中醫藥出版社
- 吳謙, "御纂 醫宗金鑑", pp.1030~ (2006), 法人文化社
- 姜忠模, "《目經大成》에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 黃庭鏡, "目經大成:曹炳章 中國醫學大成續集33", pp.442~447 (2000), 上海科學技術出版社
- 李傳課, "中醫眼科學", pp.727~731 (1999), 人民衛生出版社
- 李坤吉, "實用中醫眼科學", pp.41~ (1987), 重慶出版社
- 唐宗海, "國譯 血證論", pp.7~ (1997), 상지대학교 한의과 제4기 졸업준비위원회
- 許浚, "東醫寶鑑", pp.533~ (2002), 法人文化社
- 周命新, "醫門寶鑑", pp.57~ (1999), 海東醫學社
- 康命吉, "濟衆新編", pp.72~ (1992), 여강출판사
- 黃度淵, "醫宗損益", pp.50~ (1993), 여강출판사
- 韓秉璉, "醫方新鑑", pp.40~41 (1999), 海東醫學社
- 盧石善, "眼耳鼻咽喉皮膚科學", pp.222~228 (1999), 一中社
- 金宇煥, "李東垣의 <脾胃論>에 나타난 胃氣, 陰火, 升降浮沈의 考察", 동의대학교 東義論集, 26, pp.223~239 (1997)
- 李東垣, "脾胃論:東垣十種醫書", pp.73~ (1983), 大星文化社
- 李聰甫, "金元四大醫家 學術思想硏究", pp.162~163 (1985), 도서출판 成輔社
- 李慶雨, "編注譯解 黃帝內經素問 1", pp.133~ (1994), 여강출판사
- 전국한의과대학 본초학 교실, "本草學", pp.146~147 (1999), 永林社
- 김완희, "臟腑學의 이론과 임상", pp.107~108 (1996), 도서출판 一中社