후기 드워킨의 가치통합적 자유주의 - 롤즈와 라즈 그리고 공동체주의와의 비교적 관점에서 -
Later Dworkin's Value-Integrative Liberalism From a Comparative Perspective with Rawls, Raz and Communitarianism
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to specify the character of later Dworkin's value integrative liberalism reformulated in his 1988 Tanner Lecture on ethical foundation of liberalism. I do this by comparing his new justificatory argument of liberalism with earlier one formulated in his famous 'liberalism' and Taking Rights Seriously, as well as with those of other liberals like Rawls and Raz and that of communitarian arguments. In pursuing this aim, a special emphasis is laid on the concept of integrity, which is here understood as a meta-ethical principle requiring liberalism as a comprehensive ethical system to be internally coherent and continuous, rather than a characteristics of a special concrete ethical view. I use this concept as a guide for interpreting his later liberal theory. Later Dworkin's liberalism is justified by an approach called continuous strategy, which emphasizes the importance and necessity of unity of liberal political principles and personal ethical viewpoints. And this justificatory method can be clearly distinguished from his early one which justified liberalism on an allegedly best or better interpretation of liberal public culture. Later Dworkin's value integrative justification of liberalism has some important implications for a new understanding of some conventional political categories and principles such as public/private division,neutrality, perfectionism, paternalism and the like.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to specify the character of later Dworkin's value integrative liberalism reformulated in his 1988 Tanner Lecture on ethical foundation of liberalism. I do this by comparing his new justificatory argument of liberalism with earlier one formulated in his famous 'liberalism' and Taking Rights Seriously, as well as with those of other liberals like Rawls and Raz and that of communitarian arguments. In pursuing this aim, a special emphasis is laid on the concept of integrity, which is here understood as a meta-ethical principle requiring liberalism as a comprehensive ethical system to be internally coherent and continuous, rather than a characteristics of a special concrete ethical view. I use this concept as a guide for interpreting his later liberal theory. Later Dworkin's liberalism is justified by an approach called continuous strategy, which emphasizes the importance and necessity of unity of liberal political principles and personal ethical viewpoints. And this justificatory method can be clearly distinguished from his early one which justified liberalism on an allegedly best or better interpretation of liberal public culture. Later Dworkin's value integrative justification of liberalism has some important implications for a new understanding of some conventional political categories and principles such as public/private division,neutrality, perfectionism, paternalism and the like.
참고문헌 (23)
- R. Dworkin, "Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality", pp.237~ (2000), Harvard University Press
- 김비환, "드오킨의 자유주의 정치이론 비판", 정치사상연구, 5 (2001)
- Dworkin, "Taking Rights Seriously", pp.12~, Harvard University Press
- Ronald Dworkin, "Liberalism, in A Matter of Principle", pp.186~ (1985), Oxford University Press
- Ronald Dworkin, "Law's Empire", pp.102~ (1986), Fontana Press
- Ronald Dworkin, "What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, pp.185~246 (1981)
- Ronald Dworkin, "What is Equality? Part 2:Equality of Resources", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (1981)
- Ronald Dworkin, "What is Equality? Part 3: The Place of Liberty", Iowa law Review, 73, pp.1~54 (1987)
- Ronald Dworkin, "What is Equality? Part 4: Political Equality", University of San Francisco Law Review, 22, pp.1~30 (1987)
- 김비환, "드워킨의 권리중심적 자유주의 정치이론, in 포스트모던 시대의 정치와 문화", pp.96~119 (2005), 박영사
- Dworkin, "In Defence of Equality", Social Philosophy and Policy, 1(1), pp.31~ (1983)
- Dworkin, "The Foundations of Liberal Equality, in Equal Freedom", University of Michigan Press
- R. Dworkin, "Truth for Hedgehogs", pp.6~ (2009), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
- R. Bellamy, "Toleration, Liberalism and Democracy: A Comment on Leader and Garzón Valdés", Ratio Juris, 10(2), pp.180~ (1997)
- S. Mulhall, "Liberals and Communitarians, 2nd edition", pp.277~278 (1996), Blackwell
- R. Arneson, "Cracked Foundations of Liberal Equality, in Dworkin and His Critics" (2004), Blackwell Publishing
- J. Rawls, "The Idea of overlapping Consensus", Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1), pp.1~25 (1987)
- J. Rawls, "The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus", New York University Law Review, 64(2), pp.233~255
- J. Rawls, "Rawls,Political Liberalism" (1993), Columbia University Press
- J, Rawls, "The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good", Philosophy and Public Affairs, 17(4), pp.265~ (1988)
- Bellamy, "Toleration, Liberalism and Democracy: A Comment on Leader and Garzón Valdés", pp.180~
- Bi Hwan Kim, "The Liberal Communitarian Debate and the Preconditions for a Viable Political Theory in a Technologically Advanced World", 박사, pp.1995
- J. Raz, "The Morality of Freedom" (1986), Clarendon