본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

TRIPS와 TRIPS-Plus, 그리고 규범충돌의 문제 - 국경조치를 중심으로 -

A study on Border Measures and Norms Conflict under the TRIPS-Plus Enforcement Rules

박원석|성재호
법학연구원 (Legal Research Institute of Korea University)|2012.06|성균관법학 (SungKyunKwan Law Review)|제24권 제2호|pp. 647-671|DOI 10.17008/skklr.2012.24.2.025

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

자유무역협정지적재산권시행FTAEnforcementIPRsWTO/TRIPS 협정위조품거래방지협정WTO/TRIPSACTA
주제분류법학

초록

After the WTO/TRIPs Agreement got enforced in January 1st, 1995, the importance of Intellectual Property Rights(IPRs) in the field of international trade has rapidly been growing. In addition to more strong protection of IPRs, the developed countries, such as the United States and EU, have shifted international intellectual governance from TRIPS rules to new TRIPS-Plus norms by introducing Forum Shifting strategy, which bring more strong enforcement standards of intellectual property. In respect of TRIPS-Plus standards under various FTAs and ACTA, I examine the forum shifting strategy by developed countries, including the US and EU since the WTO/TRIPS regime successfully has operated. In Part II, I explore briefly the system of protection and enforcement of IPRs rules from TRIPS to FTA through ACTA having TRIPS-Plus standards. In Part III, I discuss about norms conflict problem between TRIPS and ACTA agreement. In addition, I search for any reasonable tools for conflict solution between different norms to a same subject matter under WTO and other international law. In Part IV, I suggest some alternatives of problems relating to laws and regulations of the TRIPS-plus standards under the ACTA and KORUS FTA in respect of border measures in Korea. In conclusion, after I examine some implications from the above several facts, I would like to suggest bringing of ADR system to avoid and resolve disputes relating to IPRs with regard to the utility of border measures under the forum shifting environment.

Abstract

After the WTO/TRIPs Agreement got enforced in January 1st, 1995, the importance of Intellectual Property Rights(IPRs) in the field of international trade has rapidly been growing. In addition to more strong protection of IPRs, the developed countries, such as the United States and EU, have shifted international intellectual governance from TRIPS rules to new TRIPS-Plus norms by introducing Forum Shifting strategy, which bring more strong enforcement standards of intellectual property. In respect of TRIPS-Plus standards under various FTAs and ACTA, I examine the forum shifting strategy by developed countries, including the US and EU since the WTO/TRIPS regime successfully has operated. In Part II, I explore briefly the system of protection and enforcement of IPRs rules from TRIPS to FTA through ACTA having TRIPS-Plus standards. In Part III, I discuss about norms conflict problem between TRIPS and ACTA agreement. In addition, I search for any reasonable tools for conflict solution between different norms to a same subject matter under WTO and other international law. In Part IV, I suggest some alternatives of problems relating to laws and regulations of the TRIPS-plus standards under the ACTA and KORUS FTA in respect of border measures in Korea. In conclusion, after I examine some implications from the above several facts, I would like to suggest bringing of ADR system to avoid and resolve disputes relating to IPRs with regard to the utility of border measures under the forum shifting environment.

참고문헌 (67)

  1. Vivian Muňoz Tellez, "The Global governance of Intellectual Property Enforcement: a New Challenge for Developing Countries, In Intellectual Property Enforcement", pp.9~ (2009), South Centre
  2. Laurence R. Helfer, "Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking", YALE J. INT'L, 29(1), pp.14~
  3. Xuan Li, "WCO SECURE : legal and economic assessment of the TRIPS-plus-plus IP enforcement, In Intellectual Property Enforcement", pp.63~64 (2009), edied by Xuan Li and Carlos M. Correa
  4. Susan K. Sell, "The Global IP Upward Ratchet, Anti-Conterfeiting and Piracy Enforcement Efforts", pp.5~6 (2008), The State of Play
  6. Peter Drahos, "BITs and BIPs: Bilateralism in Intellectual Property", the Journal of World IntellectualProperty, pp.792~793
  7. 오근엽, "한미 FTA 지재권 협상에 따른 의약품 분야 사회후생 변화", pp.26~27 (2010), 집문당
  8. HenningGrosse Ruse-Khan, "A Trade Agreement Creating Barriers to International Trade?: ACTA Border Measures and Goods in Transit", AM. U. INT'L REV, pp.645~
  9. Justice as Conflict Resolution: Proliferation, Fragmentation and Decentralization of Dispute Settlement in International Trade, "Ernst-UlrichPetersman", EUI, 46~ (2004)
  10. G.A.Zonnekeyn, "EC Liability for the Non-Implementation of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions, in: JIEL 6; Peter Drahos, Weaving Webs of Influence: The United States, Free Trade Agreements and Dispute Resolution", Journal of World Trade, 41(1), pp.191~210 (2007)
  11. Ping Xiong, "TRIPS-PLUS PROVISIONS AND THE APPROACHES TO INTERPRETATION OF FREE TRADE AFREEMENTS AND TRIPS: DO THEY AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH?", ANZSIL-SCIL ResearchSymposium on International Economic Law (2011), University of Sydney Law School
  12. 정재완, "관세법", pp.66~ (2012), 무역경영사
  13. 디지털 시대의 새로운 지적재산권 집행 관련 이슈: 위조 및 불법복제 방지협 약(ACTA)과 관련하여, "박준석", 법무부, 87~88, pp.통상법률 2009-12
  14. Six Secret(and Now Open) Fears of ACTA, Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research, "Peter K. Yu", Drake University, ~, pp.Paper No. 11-12
  15. Hong Xue, "Enforcement for development: why not an agenda for the developing world? , In Intellectual Property Enforcement", pp.134~141 (2009), SouthCentre
  16. Graeme B. Dinwoodie, "International Intellectual Property Law and Policy", pp.925~ (2000), LexisNexis
  17. 박덕영, "한-미 지적재산권 분야 국경조치제도에 관한 비교 고찰", 무역구제, 통권 : 33, pp.21~ (2007)
  18. 尾島 明, "ウルグアイラウンド” TRIPS 協定の解說-連載 第21回", 米國通商關聯知的財産權情報, 4(5), pp.5~6 (1996), 日本輸出機械組合
  19. Xuan Li, "Ten general misconceptions about the enforcement of intellectual property rights, In Intellectual Property Enforcement", pp.14~ (2009), South Centre
  20. Joseph J. Norton, "NAFTA and Beyond: A new framework for Doing Business in the Americas", pp.412~ (1995), Martinus NijhoffPublishers
  21. John H. Jackson, "The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd ed.", pp.312~313 (1997), MIT Press
  22. Xuan Li, "WCO SECURE: legal and economic assessment of the TRIPS-plus-plus IP enforcement in Intellectual Property Enforcement", pp.68~69 (2009), South Centre
  23. Xuan Li, "Ten general misconceptions, In Intellectual Property Enforcement", pp.31~ (2009), South Centre
  24. John H. Jackson, "Legal Problems of INTERNTIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS: CASES, MATERIALS AND TEXT, 4th ed", pp.452~454 (2002), WEST Group
  25. "Ping Xiong, supra 7", 3~
  26. Roger Kampf, "TRIPS and FTAs: A World of Preferential or Detrimental Relations?, In Intellectual Property & Free Trade Agreements", pp.92~93 (2007), Hart Publishing
  27. 성재호, "국제경제법", pp.361~ (2006), 박영사
  28. Laurence R. Helfer, "Toward a Human Rights Framework", Univ. of California, Davis L.R, 40(971) (2007)
  29. Joseph J. Norton, "NAFTA and Beyond: A new framework for Doing Business in the Americas", pp.412~413 (1995), Martinus NijhoffPublishers
  30. Susy Frankel, "The Legitimacy and Purpose of Intellectual Property Chapters in FTAs", Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Papers, 1(1), pp.14~ (2011)
  31. Eddan Katz, "The Impact of ACTA on the Knowledge Economy: The Accountability of the Office of the U.S Trade Representative for the Creation of IP Enforcement Norms Through Executive Trade Agreements", The Yale Journalof International Law Online, 35, pp.28~30 (2009)
  32. 山口直樹, "知的財産權과 國際貿易", pp.99~100 (2010), 成文堂
  33. John V. Luong, "New Intellectual Property Issues", pp.86~ (2007), NOVA Publishers, Inc.
  34. Kimberlee Weatherall, "ACTA as a New Kind of International IP Lawmaking", PIJIP, AmericanUniversity Washington College of Law, pp.6~ (2010)
  35. Shashank P. Kumar, "Border Enforcement of IP Rights against In Transit Generic Pharmaceuticals: An Essay of Character and Consistency", European Intellectual Property Review, Forthcoming, pp.7~10 (2010)
  36. MariusSchneider, "ECTA(European Communities Trade Mark Association) 바르샤바 제25차 연례회의 자료 집", ~
  37. Oliver Vrins, "Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights through Border Measures", pp.65~ (2009), Oxford University Press
  38. "Oliver Vrins and Marius Schneider, supra 38", 69~
  39. Andrew Rens, "Collateral Damage: The Impact of ACTA and the Enforcement Agenda on the World's Poorest People", AM. U. INT'L L. REV, 783(809), pp.788~
  40. 김욱준, "위조 및 불법복제방지 협정(ACTA)' 타결, 국제 적 수준에서 온라인 저작권 집행노력 강화", 정보통신정책연구원 동향분석 자료, 22(19)통권 : 495, pp.31~
  42. "Intellectual Property Watch, Near-Finished Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Pact Could Have Broad Reach" (2010)[URL]
  43. Margot E. Kaminski, "An Overview and the Evolution of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement(ACTA), PJIP Research Paper Series", American University Washington College of Law, pp.3~5 (2011)
  44. "European Commission & Trade Fact Sheet, The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement"[URL]
  45. WIPO and the ACTA Threat, "Sara Bannerman", AmericanUniversity Washington College of Law, 13~ (2010)
  46. David W. Leebron, "Linkages", AMER. J. INT'L, 96
  47. 조유미, "EU의 TRIPS-Plus 국경조치와 지적재산권 보호에 관한 소고", 국제경제법연구, 8(1), pp.251~ (2010)
  48. "Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, supra 5", 663~667
  51. China Slams Nearly Completed ACTA, "Questions it WTO Compatibility, INSIDE U.S. TRADE", ~ (2010)
  52. C. Wilfred Jenks, "The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties", BRIT. Y.B. INT'L L, 401~426 (1953)
  53. Joost Pawelyn, "The Role of Public International Law In the WTO: How Far Can We go?", TheAmerican Journal of International Law, 95(535), pp.551~
  54. Joost Pauwelyn, "CONFLICT OF NORMS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW: HOW WTO LAW REGULATES TO OTHER RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW", pp.176~188 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  55. Appellate Body Report, "Guatemala Anti-Dumping Investigation Regarding Portland Cement from Mexico, para. 65, WT", DS60, R (Nov. 2, 1998) (defining conflict as "a situation where adherence to the one provision will lead to the violation of the another provision, pp.Joost Pauwelyn, supra, 1998[DOI]
  56. 김승호, "WTO 통상분쟁 판례해설(I)", pp.38~39 (2007), 법영사
  57. "Indonesia-Certain Measures Affecting the Automobile Industry case: WT", DS54, DS55, pp.R, WT, DS59[DOI]
  58. Joost Pauwelyn, "The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?", AJIL, 95(535), pp.550~551
  59. 조유미, "EU의 TRIPS-Plus 국경조치와 지적재산권 보호에 관한 소고", 국제경제법연구, 8(1) (2010)
  60. 이안 브라운리, "국제법", pp.598~ (2004), 현암사
  61. Richard K. Gardiner, "TREATY INTERPRETATION", pp.126~ (2008), Oxford University Press
  62. Benedetto Contorti, "International Law and the Role of Domestic Legal Systems", pp.116~ (1993), Martin NijhoffPublishers
  64. Andrew D. Mitchell, "Patents and Public Health in the WTO, FTAs and Beyond", WORLD J. TRADE, 43(571), pp.571~601 (2009)
  65. Henning Ruse-Khan, "The International Law Relation Between TRIPS and Subsequent TRIPS-Plus, Free Trade Agreements: Toward Safeguarding TRIPS Flexiblities?", J. INTELL.PROP. L, 18
  66. Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, "supra 5", 689~693
  67. Annette Kur, "Enough is enough-the notion of binding ceiling in international intellectual property protection, in Intellectual Property Rights in a Fair World Trade System: Proposals for Reform of TRIPS", pp.397~398 (2011), Edward Elgar

관련 논문AI추천

지적재산권 관련 국경조치에 관한 연구윤종수사법발전재단 · 사법2010 · 제1권 제12호의약품 특허보호 관련 TRIPS-Plus협정의 법적 쟁점 및 시사점이로리안암법학회 · 안암법학2012 · 제38호위조 및 불법복제 방지협정(ACTA)의 탄생, 의미 및 전망박영규한국경영법률학회 · 경영법률2011 · 제21권 제3호ACTA, 과연 국제무역을 위해 필요한 제도인가? : ACTA와 TRIPS의 비교를 중심으로육소영법학연구원 · 법학논고2012 · 제39호Effect of TRIPs Agreement and Measures to Improve Intellectual Property Rights in South Korea for Promotion of International Trade김성진법학연구원 · 법학논총2015 · 제39권 제3호한미 자유무역협정(FTA)은 순응의 산물인가 아니면 선택의 결과인가? : 의약품 관련 지적재산권 분야를 중심으로권도혁, 류석진세종연구소 · 국가전략2017 · 제23권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)

북한헌법 변화의 특징과 전망김형성, 조재현pp. 1-37수사지휘권의 헌법적 근거 및 한계에 관한 연구김형성, 황운하pp. 39-60사회기반시설의 헌법적 의의와 국가의 책임홍석한pp. 61-84공공기관의 무기계약직에 대한 공법적 검토 - 도로보수원 및 과적단속원과 관련하여 -강현호pp. 85-114부패방지법의 문제점과 개선방안김형성pp. 115-139
원문 보기