배심원들의 살인사건재판평결에 관한 경험적 실험연구-이야기모델의 적용을 중심으로-
An experimental jury study examining juror decision making on a murder case
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine key propositions of the Story model to understand jurors' decision making process in a trial. The Story model posits that jury collect and combine facts and evidence information presented at trial to construct their own story to help their final decision making for the trial case. To complete this purpose, this study conducted a mock jury experiment with a sample of 302 college students drawn from two different provinces in Korea. The findings of the study reveled a supportive evidence for the Story model. The results of recognition memory experiment and confidence rating on jurors' guilty decision revealed that an order of evidence presented influences the structure of story that a juror construct during trial as the Story model proposed. Further, this study found that the evidence order also affects on jurors confidence level of the evidence presented by a prosecutor. The limitations, contributions, and policy implications are discussed in the discussion.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine key propositions of the Story model to understand jurors' decision making process in a trial. The Story model posits that jury collect and combine facts and evidence information presented at trial to construct their own story to help their final decision making for the trial case. To complete this purpose, this study conducted a mock jury experiment with a sample of 302 college students drawn from two different provinces in Korea. The findings of the study reveled a supportive evidence for the Story model. The results of recognition memory experiment and confidence rating on jurors' guilty decision revealed that an order of evidence presented influences the structure of story that a juror construct during trial as the Story model proposed. Further, this study found that the evidence order also affects on jurors confidence level of the evidence presented by a prosecutor. The limitations, contributions, and policy implications are discussed in the discussion.
참고문헌 (19)
- N. Pennington, "Reasoning in explanation-based decision making", Cognition, 49 (1993)
- M. Readon, "Jury decision making and the story model: How do deliberation style and evidence order influence the story that juries create?", 박사, pp.2008
- 김병수, "국민참여재판의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 한국범죄학회 2011년 춘계학술회의 자료집 (2011)
- 김상준, "배심평결과 판사판결의 일치도 및 판단차이에 관한 연구", 석사, 형사법, pp.2011
- 국민참여재판 배심원 선정절차의운용 및 개선방안, "박광배", 법원행정처, ~ (2009)
- 형사정책과 사법제도에 관한 연구(V): 국민참여재판제도의 평가와 정책화 방안, "탁희성", 형사정책연구원, ~ (2011)
- 민경환, "권위주의성격과 사회적 편견-대학생집단을 중심으로", 한국심리학지, 14(2), pp.146~168 (1989)
- 국민참여재판 배심원 선정절차의운용 및 개선방안, "박광배", 법원행정처, ~ (2009)
- 심지예, "배심원의 심리특성이 양형 판단에 미치는 영향", 석사, 범죄심리학, pp.2010
- N. Pennington, "Evidence evaluation in complex decision making", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, pp.242~258 (1986)
- R. Hastie, "Explanation-based decision making, In Judgment and decision making", pp.212~228 (2000), Cambridge
- N. Pennington, "Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, pp.189~206 (1992)
- N. Pennington, "Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, pp.521~533 (1988)
- N. Pennington, "Practical implications of psychological research on juror and jury decision making", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, pp.90~105 (1990)
- N. J. Finkel, "Crime prototypes, objective versus subjective culpability, and a commonsense balance", Law and Human Behavior, 21, pp.209~230 (1997)
- V. L. Smith, "What do you expect? The influence of people’'s prior knowledge of crime categories on fact-finding", Law and Human Behavior, 20, pp.517~532 (1996)
- M.B. Wolfe, "Memory and judgment: Availability versus explanation-based accounts", Memory and Cognition, 28(20), pp.624~634
- J.E. Huntley, "Sexual harassment stories: Testing a story mediated model of juror decision making in civil litigation", Law and Human Behavior, 27, pp.29~51 (2003)
- L. Olsen-Fulero, "Commonsense rape judgments: An empathycomplexity theory of rape juror story making", Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, pp.402~427 (1997)