본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

WTO 분쟁해결기구와 TRIPS협정: TRIPS 공공영역의 분쟁해결제도화

WTO Dispute Settlement Body and TRIPS: Institutionalization of TRIPS Public Domain in the Dispute Settlement System

성재호|유준구
법학연구원 (Legal Research Institute of Korea University)|2008.08|성균관법학 (SungKyunKwan Law Review)|제20권 제2호|pp. 583-612|DOI 10.17008/skklr.2008.20.2.024

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

공공재지적재산권GATTWTODSU분쟁해결기구public goodspublic domainintellectual property rights공유성TRIPSAppellate Body공공영역항소기구public international law일반국제법교차보복분쟁해결협정비위반제소cross retaliationDispute Settlement Body: DSBnon-violation complaints
주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

With the advent of the TRIPS Agreement, international disputes about governmental regulation of intellectual property rights are now subject to adjudication within WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The focus of this paper on TRIPS Agreement begs the larger question of whether the WTO mechanism to settle trade disputes between nations takes sufficient account of so-called 'public domain' of TRIPS Agreement in general. The question of how to promote and institutionalize global public domain affirms in a world of sovereign states with divergent norms and preferences, reflecting differences in economic development levels, increasingly confronts the international policy agenda. It raises issues not only for political decision-making but also for judicial interpretation of existing international agreements. The study begins with delineating characteristics and conflicts of TRIPS Agreement taking into backgrounds the UR negotiation and it also distinguishes application of GATT dispute mechanism to the TRIPS Agreement comparing the past GATT with the newly-designed WTO system. This study examines the nature, not only of the WTO as an institution, but of WTO obligation. It posits that WTO obligations remain mixed with a bilateral contract nature and a collective or consitutional type and offers how the TRIPS public domain have fared in the WTO dispute settlement process. The paper wraps up the suggestions on how the WTO system could be improved to give more prominence to public domain of intellectual property rights.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Arvind Panagariya, "TRIPS and the WTO: An Uneasy Marriage" (1999), WTO Working Paper
  2. 성재호, "국제경제법" (2006), 박영사
  3. Merges, "Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age", ~ (2003)
  4. Perter Drahos, "A Philosophy of Intellectual Property" (1996), Dartmouth
  5. Paul A. Samuelson, "The Aspects of Public Expenditure Theories", ~ (1958)
  6. (K. E. Maskus, "International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology", ~ (2005)
  7. Jane, "Intellectual Property Rights, Investment and Trade in Services in the Uruguay Round, Laying and Foundation", 66~7., ~ (1987)
  8. 박형래, 박건영, "국가별 지적재산권 보호 수준 결정 요인에 대한 실증분석-국가별 소득수준에 따른 차이를 중심으로-", 국제통상연구, 12(1), pp.57~79 (2007), 한국국제통상학회
  9. J. Smith, "How Do Foreign Patent Rights Affect U.S. Exports, Affiliate and Developing Countries", 415~16., ~ (2001)
  10. 박준우, "TRIPS 협정의 의약품 특허와 공중보건에 관한 미국의 입장과 대응방안", 산업재산권, (20), pp.4~, 제20호,(2006),제4장을 참조.
  11. Ernest H. Preeg, "Traders in Brave New World: the Uruguay Round and the Future of the International Trading System", ~ (1995)
  12. 성재호, "WTO체제하의 지적재산권분쟁", 국제법학회논총, 42(2), pp.75~82
  13. 이재형, "世界貿易機構 紛爭解決制度의 運用上 問題點에 대한 批判的 考察", 통상법률, (52), pp.52~77 (2003), 법무부
  14. 성재호, "국제경제법" (2006), 박영사
  15. Pieter J. Kuijper, "The New WTO Dispute Settlement System~the Impact on the European Community", 52 (1995)
  16. Andreas F. Lowenfeld, "Remedies Along with Rights: Institutional Reform in New GATT", ~ (1994)
  17. Sydney M. Core, "The Asbestos Case and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: The Uneasy Relationship Between Panels and the Appellate Body", 138~42., ~ (2001)
  18. Konstantin J. Joerges, "The True Appellate Procedures of Only a Two­Stage Process? A Comparative View of the Appellate Body under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding", 197~99., ~ (1999)
  19. Joost Pauwelyn, "Options for Implementing a Remand Process in WTO Dispute Settlement", ~ (2006)
  20. Wilfred J. Ethier, "Intellectual Property Rights and Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization", ~ (2005)
  21. Eric W. Bond, "The Economics of International Trade Agreements and Dispute Settlement with Intellectual Property Rights", ~ (2005)
  22. Bernard Hoekman, "the Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to WTO", ~ (1995)
  23. Wilfred J. Ethier, "Dispute Settlement in Trade Agreements, University of Pennsylvania", ~ (2001)
  24. 김대원, "WTO 비위반제소와 국가책임론 - 제3의 유형의 국가책임인가?-", 국제법학회논총, 50(1), pp.11~28 (2005), 대한국제법학회
  25. 박영덕, "GATT", WTO 분쟁해결제도와 비위반의 제소, pp.(26), ~
  26. 오미영, "WTO TRIPS 협정상의 특허보호 분쟁사례 연구: 비위반제소를 중심으로", 비교사법, 12(4), 제12권 제4호(2006),
  27. Sung­Joon Cho, "GATT Non­Violation Issues in the WTO Framework: Are They the Achilles' Heel of the Dispute Settlement Process?", ~ (1998)
  28. A. Chua, "Reasonable Expectations and Non­Violation Complaints in GATT", WTO Jurisprudence, 1998, ~
  29. Judith H. Bello, "Some Practical Observations about WTO Settlement of International Property Disputes", 367~69., ~ (1997)
  30. Subramaniam, A, "Can TRIPS serve ad an Enforecement Device for Developing Countries in the WTO?", 403~16을 참조 (2000)
  31. Sol Picciotto, "Defending the Public Interest in TRIPS and the WTO", ~ (2002)
  32. 최승환, "WTO 농산물 분쟁사례 연구", ~ (2003)
  33. Judish H. Bello, "Some Practical Observation about WTO Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes", 367., ~ (1997)
  34. Peter Drahos, "The Regulation of Public Goods", ~ (2005)
  35. D. Gervais, "The TRIPS Agreement, Drafting History and Analysis", ~ (2003)
  36. R. Helfer, "Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking", 4., ~ (2004)
  37. Robert Howse, "Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing in the WTO is a Step Too Far", ~ (2001)
  38. W. Schwartz, "The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the WTO", ~ (2002)
  39. Padideh Ala'i, "Judicial Lobbying at The WTO: The Debate over The Use of Amicus Curiae Briefs and The U.S. Experience", ~ (2000)
  40. 박덕영, "WTO 분쟁해결과정에서 Amicus Brief의 취급문제", 국제법평론, (24), pp.64~66, 통권 제24호(2006-II),64~6면
  41. 장신, "NGO의 국제적 지위향상과 국내 ENGO의 역할증대", 법률행정논총, 23(1), pp.129~130, 제23집,제1호,2003,129-30면.
  42. Gail. E. Evans, "Lawmaking under the Trade Constitution: A Study in Legislation by the World Trade Organization", ~ (2000)
  43. Richard Steinberg, "In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus­Based and Outcomes in the GATT", WTO, 2002
  44. Susy Frankel, "WTO Application of The Customary Rules of International Public International Law to Intellectual Property", ~ (2006)
  45. "."[URL]
  46. Joost Pauwelyn, "Proposals for Reform of Article 21 of the DSU", ~ (2003)
  47. 최승환, "국제경제법" (2006), 법영사

관련 논문AI추천

WTO體制에서의 FTA紛爭解決制度안덕근법무부 · 국제법무연구2003 · 제49호WTO 분쟁해결기구 최신 동향노유경법무부 · 국제법무연구2019 · 제144호WTO분쟁해결제도와 한국의 경험최원목법학연구소 · 법학논집2005 · 제9권 제2호世界貿易機構 紛爭解決制度의 運用上 問題點에 대한 批判的 考察이재형법무부 · 국제법무연구2003 · 제52호WTO 분쟁해결양해각서(DSU)상의 중재에 관한 연구손태우법무부 · 국제법무연구2006 · 제69호다국적 제약자본의 지적재산권 보호 對 국민 건강권 보장간의 갈등이수연한국사회복지연구회 · 사회복지연구2004 · 제23호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)

행정정보자원관리법제의 개선방향과 원칙에 관한 연구김명식, 김일환pp. 1-36雙務契約의 特殊한 效力으로서 同時履行抗辯權에 관한 檢討 -本質에 관한 論議를 中心으로 -성준호pp. 37-56기여분과 대습상속인의 상속분안영하pp. 57-83상속재산의 협의분할과 채권자취소권에 관한 연구장창민pp. 85-104법률비용보험의 국내시장 활성화 방안에 관한 연구이봉림pp. 105-132
원문 보기