본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

형사소송법상 범죄피해자 정보보호관련 규정의 개선방안

A study on Reformation of Information Protection Regulation of the Crime Victims on the Criminal Procedure Act

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

These days, the crime victim's active participation in criminal procedure largely had affirmative functions, and it produced problems. An example was retaliatory crime against the crime victim and witness. With reference to retaliatory crime, the Criminal Procedure Act, the Act on Protection of the Reporter of Specific Crimes had various kinds of means that could protect safety of crime victim, and possible additional damage still existed, and retaliatory crime actually increased. To keep safety of the crime victim, possible exposure of the crime victim should be lessened as much as possible. In other words, information protection of the crime victim could actually protect crime victim to require needs and appropriateness of the crime victim. However, current regulations of information protection of the crime victim had some of special laws at limited areas, and the Criminal Procedure Act had some of regulations that had a little relation with information of the crime victim. This paper examined improvement of current legal system of information protection of the crime victim, and suggested reformation and improvement of regulations of the Criminal Procedure Act. The paper examined values of information protection of the crime victim (II), legal improvement of not only special law and the Criminal Procedure Act of information protection of the crime victim (III), and improvement of the Criminal Procedure Act for information protection of the crime victim (IV). Current legal system of information protection of the crime victim was focused on passive information protection. The criminal procedure should have right to informational self-determination to control flow of his or her information, for which system should be reformed to give claim right that could be active to control flow of his or her information.

Abstract

These days, the crime victim's active participation in criminal procedure largely had affirmative functions, and it produced problems. An example was retaliatory crime against the crime victim and witness. With reference to retaliatory crime, the Criminal Procedure Act, the Act on Protection of the Reporter of Specific Crimes had various kinds of means that could protect safety of crime victim, and possible additional damage still existed, and retaliatory crime actually increased. To keep safety of the crime victim, possible exposure of the crime victim should be lessened as much as possible. In other words, information protection of the crime victim could actually protect crime victim to require needs and appropriateness of the crime victim. However, current regulations of information protection of the crime victim had some of special laws at limited areas, and the Criminal Procedure Act had some of regulations that had a little relation with information of the crime victim. This paper examined improvement of current legal system of information protection of the crime victim, and suggested reformation and improvement of regulations of the Criminal Procedure Act. The paper examined values of information protection of the crime victim (II), legal improvement of not only special law and the Criminal Procedure Act of information protection of the crime victim (III), and improvement of the Criminal Procedure Act for information protection of the crime victim (IV). Current legal system of information protection of the crime victim was focused on passive information protection. The criminal procedure should have right to informational self-determination to control flow of his or her information, for which system should be reformed to give claim right that could be active to control flow of his or her information.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 서울신문, "피흘리는 ‘증인’들-진실을 말했다가 사망까지…보복범죄 3년새 84% 급증", 1~ (2011)
  2. 이창범, "개인정보보호법", pp.15~ (2012), 법문사
  3. "헌법재판소 전원재판부, 2005. 5. 26. 선고 99헌마513 결정", ~
  4. 박광민, "범죄피해자 정보보호의 강화방안", 피해자학연구, 20(1), pp.15~40 (2012), 한국피해자학회[DOI]
  5. 이한주, "개인의료정보의 헌법적 보호", 박사, pp.2011
  6. 박광민, "범죄피해자 정보보호의 강화방안", 피해자학연구, 20(1), pp.15~40 (2012), 한국피해자학회[DOI]
  7. 권영성, "헌법학원론", pp.445~ (2007), 법문사
  8. 백윤철, "개인정보보호법", pp.158~ (2008), 한국학술정보(주)
  9. 김일환, "정보자기결정권의 헌법상 근거와 보호에 관한 연구", 공법연구, 29(3), pp.90~ (2001)
  10. 김혜정, "범죄피해자·증인의 신상정보 보호강화에 관한 소고", 피해자학연구, 18(2), pp.241~261 (2010), 한국피해자학회
  11. 박광민, "범죄피해자·증인 신변보호제도 강화방안 - 범죄피해자의 실질적 신변보호를 중심으로 -", 피해자학연구, 17(2), pp.81~108 (2009), 한국피해자학회
  12. "헌법재판소,2003. 3. 27, 2000헌마 474 전원재판부결정", ~ (2003)
  13. 이호중, "검사의 증거개시의무와 수사기록 열람․등사의 거부에 대한 규제방안", 형사법연구, 21(2), pp.195~226 (2009), 한국형사법학회
  14. 법무부, "개정형사소송법", pp.131~ (2007)
  15. 김용세, "개정 형사소송법의 범죄피해자 보호규정", 피해자학연구, 15(2), pp.129~156 (2007), 한국피해자학회
  16. 김순석, "개정 형사소송법상 범죄피해자보호규정에 관한 소고", 198~
  17. 개정 형사소송법상의 범죄피해자보호에 관한 연구, "백승민", 214~
  18. 백승민, "개정 형사소송법상의 범죄피해자보호에 관한 연구", 법조, 57(2), pp.194~223 (2008), 법조협회
  19. 정진수, "미국의 증인보호제도", 형사정책연구, 7(3), pp.140~ (1996)
  20. 김혜정, "범죄피해자·증인의 신상정보 보호강화에 관한 소고", 피해자학연구, 18(2), pp.241~261 (2010), 한국피해자학회
  21. 송광섭, "범죄피해자보호의 현황과 형사사법체계 내에서의 피해자보호방안", 저스티스, (82), pp.5~27 (2004), 한국법학원
  22. 박광민, "범죄피해자·증인 신변보호제도 강화방안 - 범죄피해자의 실질적 신변보호를 중심으로 -", 피해자학연구, 17(2), pp.81~108 (2009), 한국피해자학회
  23. 김순석, "개정 형사소송법상 범죄피해자보호 규정에 관한 소고", 한국경찰학회보, 11(3), pp.169~204 (2009), 한국경찰학회
  24. 박정성, "개정 형사소송법상 피해자 보호에 관한 규정", 한양법학, 57(27), pp.13~30 (2009), 한양법학회
  25. 김봉수, "새로운 형사재판에서 피해자의 권리보호", 피해자학연구, 16(1), pp.277~298 (2008), 한국피해자학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)