본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중독관리센터의 경제적 효과에 대한 체계적 고찰

Systematic review for economic benefit of poison control center

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to investigate the socio-economic benefits of the poison control center (PCC) and to assess whether telephone counseling at the poison control center affects the frequency of emergency room visits, hospitalization, and length of stay of patients with acute poisoning. Methods: The authors conducted a medical literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers evaluated the abstracts for eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality using a standardized tool. Key results such as the cost-benefit ratio, hospital stay days, unnecessary emergency room visits or hospitalizations, and reduced hospital charges were extracted from the studies. When meta-analysis was possible, it was performed using RevMan software (RevMan version 5.4). Results: Among 299 non-duplicated studies, 19 were relevant to the study questions. The cost-benefit ratios of PCC showed a wide range from 0.76 to 36 (average 6.8) according to the level of the medical expense of each country and whether the study included intentional poisoning. PCC reduced unnecessary visits to healthcare facilities. PCC consultation shortened the length of hospital stay by 1.82 (95% CI, 1.07-2.57) days. Conclusion: The systematic review and meta-analysis support the hypothesis that the PCC operation is cost-beneficial. However, when implementing the PCC concept in Korea in the future, it is necessary to prepare an institutional framework to ensure a costeffective model.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to investigate the socio-economic benefits of the poison control center (PCC) and to assess whether telephone counseling at the poison control center affects the frequency of emergency room visits, hospitalization, and length of stay of patients with acute poisoning. Methods: The authors conducted a medical literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers evaluated the abstracts for eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed the study quality using a standardized tool. Key results such as the cost-benefit ratio, hospital stay days, unnecessary emergency room visits or hospitalizations, and reduced hospital charges were extracted from the studies. When meta-analysis was possible, it was performed using RevMan software (RevMan version 5.4). Results: Among 299 non-duplicated studies, 19 were relevant to the study questions. The cost-benefit ratios of PCC showed a wide range from 0.76 to 36 (average 6.8) according to the level of the medical expense of each country and whether the study included intentional poisoning. PCC reduced unnecessary visits to healthcare facilities. PCC consultation shortened the length of hospital stay by 1.82 (95% CI, 1.07-2.57) days. Conclusion: The systematic review and meta-analysis support the hypothesis that the PCC operation is cost-beneficial. However, when implementing the PCC concept in Korea in the future, it is necessary to prepare an institutional framework to ensure a costeffective model.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Spiller HA, "The value and evolving role of the U.S. Poison Control Center System", Public Health Rep, 124, pp.359~363 (2009)
  2. Anell A, "Toxicologic information center’s hotline–well-received and cost-effective for the society, Alternate title: Giftinformationscentralens rådgivning--omtyckt och lönsam för samhället. National Library of Medicine", Lakartidningen, 98(24), pp.2926~2930 (2001)
  3. Dierick-van Daele AT, "Critical appraisal of the literature on economic evaluations of substitution of skills between professionals : a systematic literature review", J Eval Clin Pract, 14, pp.481~492 (2008)
  4. Kearney TE, "Health care cost effects of public use of a regional poison control center", West J Med, 162, pp.499~504 (1995)
  5. Miller TR, "Costs of poisoning in the United States and savings from poison control centers : a benefit-cost analysis", Ann Emerg Med, 29, pp.239~245 (1997)
  6. Phillips KA, "The costs and outcomes of restricting public access to poison control centers. Results from a natural experiment", Med Care, 36, pp.271~280 (1998)
  7. Blizzard JC, "Cost-benefit analysis of a regional poison center", Clin Toxicol(Phila), 46, pp.450~456 (2008)
  8. LoVecchio F, "Poison control centers decrease emergency healthcare utilization costs", J Med Toxicol, 4, pp.221~224 (2008)
  9. Zaloshnja E, "The impact of poison control centers on poisoning-related visits to EDs--United States, 2003", Am J Emerg Med, 26, pp.310~315 (2008)
  10. Tak CR, "The value of a poison control center in preventing unnecessary ED visits and hospital charges : A multi-year analysis", Am J Emerg Med, 35, pp.438~443 (2017)
  11. King WD, "Poison control centers: can their value be measured?", South Med J, 84, pp.722~726 (1991)
  12. Harrison DL, "Cost-effectiveness of regional poison control centers", Arch Intern Med, 156, pp.2601~2608 (1996)
  13. Vassilev ZP, "The impact of a poison control center on the length of hospital stay for patients with poisoning", J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70, pp.107~110 (2007)
  14. Bunn TL, "The effect of poison control center consultation on accidental poisoning inpatient hospitalizations with preexisting medical conditions", J Toxicol Environ Health A, 71, pp.283~288 (2008)
  15. Friedman LS, "The association between U.S. Poison Center assistance and length of stay and hospital charges", Clin Toxicol(Phila), 52, pp.198~206 (2014)
  16. Chafee-Bahamon C, "Effectiveness of a regional poison center in reducing excess emergency room visits for children’s poisonings", Pediatrics, 72, pp.164~169 (1983)
  17. Zaloshnja E, "The potential impact of poison control centers on rural hospitalization rates for poisoning", Pediatrics, 118, pp.2094~2100 (2006)
  18. Lerner WM, "The challenge of privately-financed community health programs in an era of cost containment : a case study of poison control centers", J Public Health Policy, 9, pp.411~428 (1988)
  19. Galvão TF, "Impact of a poison control center on the length of hospital stay of poisoned patients : retrospective cohort", Sao Paulo Med J, 129, pp.23~29 (2011)
  20. Toverud EL, "The National Poison Center in Norway : user satisfaction and a health economic evaluation", Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 65, pp.935~940 (2009)
  21. Ponampalam R, "Cost benefits of the Drug and Poison Information Centre in preventing unnecessary hospitalisation : The Singapore experience", Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17, pp.45~53 (2010)
  22. Descamps AK, "Belgian Poison Centre impact on healthcare expenses of unintentional poisonings : a cost-benefit analysis", Int J Public Health, 64, pp.1283~1290 (2019)
  23. 천병철, "예방접종의 경제성 평가방법과 사례", Pediatric Infection and Vaccine, 15(1), pp.19~28 (2008), 대한소아감염학회
  24. Mowry JB, "2015 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System(NPDS) : 33rd Annual Report", Clin Toxicol(Phila), 54, pp.924~1109 (2016)
  25. 2017 Basic analysis report of Korea health panel study(I), "Moon SW", 86~ (2019)
  26. Levine M, "Impact of the Use of Regional Poison Control Centers in an Urban EMS Dispatch System", J Med Toxicol, 13, pp.47~51 (2017)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)