한용운 『님의 침묵』 연구 - 주체와 ‘님’의 관계를 중심으로 -
A Study on Han Yong-Woon's The Silence of the Lover
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The primary purpose of this article is to show that the love in The Silence of The Lover can not be explained as a simple 'farewell→reunion' schema. The reunion with lover produces not only pleasure but also unpleasure. Ultimately, this means that the reunion in juissance with lover brings about the aphanisis of subject. In this situation, subject can't help postponing the reunion in juissance with lover. Because, the delay is the only way to found a subject in himself in the silence of lover. This delay plays a role to construct he/she as a desiring subject. This shows up the subject's efforts to establish a new relationship with his/her lover. Namely, The narrator in The Silence of The Lover is crossing over the border between 'the way to imagination' and 'the way to symbolization'. Kim So-wol's 'the way to imagination' leads to extreme danger, the erasure of a subject and reality. But, Han Yong-Woon's 'the way to symbolization' leads to new world, the birth of a seperated subject.
Abstract
The primary purpose of this article is to show that the love in The Silence of The Lover can not be explained as a simple 'farewell→reunion' schema. The reunion with lover produces not only pleasure but also unpleasure. Ultimately, this means that the reunion in juissance with lover brings about the aphanisis of subject. In this situation, subject can't help postponing the reunion in juissance with lover. Because, the delay is the only way to found a subject in himself in the silence of lover. This delay plays a role to construct he/she as a desiring subject. This shows up the subject's efforts to establish a new relationship with his/her lover. Namely, The narrator in The Silence of The Lover is crossing over the border between 'the way to imagination' and 'the way to symbolization'. Kim So-wol's 'the way to imagination' leads to extreme danger, the erasure of a subject and reality. But, Han Yong-Woon's 'the way to symbolization' leads to new world, the birth of a seperated subject.
참고문헌 (19)
- 한용운, "한용운전집" (1973), 신구문화사
- 고은, "한용운 평전" (1975), 민음사
- 김종주, "침묵하는 님의 정신분석, 라깡 정신분석과 문학평론", pp.198~207 (1996), 하나의학사
- 김재홍, "한용운문학연구" (1982), 일지사
- 서준섭, "한용운의 상상세계와 수의 비밀 in한용운 연구" (1982), 새문사
- 안원현, "자끄 라깡의 ‘응시’에 대한 연구", 예술연구, 10, pp.7~89 (2004)
- 오세영, "마쏘히즘과 사랑의 실체,in 한용운 연구" (1982), 새문사
- 윤일환, "시각의 지울 수 없는 얼룩: 라캉의 응시의 위상학", 비평과이론, 9(1), pp.117~156 (2004), 한국비평이론학회
- 이혜원, "한용운 시에서의 욕망과 언어의 문제", 국어국문학, (120), pp.203~228 (1997)
- 정지은, "라깡의 응시에 비추어 본 메를로-퐁티의 가시적인 것의 깊이", 라깡과 현대정신분석, 12(1), pp.151~174 (2010), 한국라깡과현대정신분석학회
- 조성면, "한용운 재론", 민족문학사 연구, (7), pp.190~213 (1995)
- 주은우, "현대성의 시각체제에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- 최동호, "한용운" (2001), 건대출판부
- 브루스 핑크, "라캉과 정신 의학" (2002), 민음사
- 슬라보에 지젝, "사랑의 대상으로서 시선과 목소리" (2010), 인간사랑
- 슬라보예 지젝, "How to read 라깡" (2007), 웅진 지식하우스
- 자끄 라깡, "세미나 11" (2008), 새물결
- 핼 포스터, "실재의 귀환" (2003), 경성대출판부
- Dany Nobus, "Key Concepts Of Lacanian Psychoanalysis" (1998), Other Press
