마이크로네시아 웨노섬 연안 서식지 분포의 현장조사와 위성영상 분석법 비교
Comparison between in situ Survey and Satellite Imagery with Regard to Coastal Habitat Distribution Patterns in Weno, Micronesia
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this study is to suggest an optimal survey method for coastal habitat monitoring around Weno Island in Chuuk Atoll, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). This study was carried out to compare and analyze differences between in situ survey (PHOTS) and high spatial satellite imagery (Worldview-2) with regard to the coastal habitat distribution patterns of Weno Island. The in situ field data showed the following coverage of habitat types: sand 42.4%, seagrass 26.1%, algae 14.9%, rubble 8.9%, hard coral 3.5%, soft coral 2.6%, dead coral 1.5%, others 0.1%. The satellite imagery showed the following coverage of habitat types: sand 26.5%, seagrass 23.3%, sand + seagrass 12.3%, coral 18.1%, rubble 19.0%, rock 0.8% (Accuracy 65.2%). According to the visual interpretation of the habitat map by in situ survey, seagrass, sand, coral and rubble distribution were misaligned compared with the satellite imagery. While, the satellite imagery appear to be a plausible results to identify habitat types, it could not classify habitat types under one pixel in images, which in turn overestimated coral and rubble coverage, underestimated algae and sand. The differences appear to arise primarily because of habitat classification scheme, sampling scale and remote sensing reflectance. The implication of these results is that satellite imagery analysis needs to incorporate in situ survey data to accurately identify habitat. We suggest that satellite imagery must correspond with in situ survey in habitat classification and sampling scale. Subsequently habitat sub-segmentation based on the in situ survey data should be applied to satellite imagery.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to suggest an optimal survey method for coastal habitat monitoring around Weno Island in Chuuk Atoll, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). This study was carried out to compare and analyze differences between in situ survey (PHOTS) and high spatial satellite imagery (Worldview-2) with regard to the coastal habitat distribution patterns of Weno Island. The in situ field data showed the following coverage of habitat types: sand 42.4%, seagrass 26.1%, algae 14.9%, rubble 8.9%, hard coral 3.5%, soft coral 2.6%, dead coral 1.5%, others 0.1%. The satellite imagery showed the following coverage of habitat types: sand 26.5%, seagrass 23.3%, sand + seagrass 12.3%, coral 18.1%, rubble 19.0%, rock 0.8% (Accuracy 65.2%). According to the visual interpretation of the habitat map by in situ survey, seagrass, sand, coral and rubble distribution were misaligned compared with the satellite imagery. While, the satellite imagery appear to be a plausible results to identify habitat types, it could not classify habitat types under one pixel in images, which in turn overestimated coral and rubble coverage, underestimated algae and sand. The differences appear to arise primarily because of habitat classification scheme, sampling scale and remote sensing reflectance. The implication of these results is that satellite imagery analysis needs to incorporate in situ survey data to accurately identify habitat. We suggest that satellite imagery must correspond with in situ survey in habitat classification and sampling scale. Subsequently habitat sub-segmentation based on the in situ survey data should be applied to satellite imagery.
참고문헌 (25)
- Andréfouët S, "Multisite evaluation of IKONOS data for classification of tropical coral reef environments", Remote Sens Environ, 88, pp.128~143 (2003)
- English S, "Survey Manual for Tropical Marine Resources", Australian Institute of Marine Science, 390~ (1994)
- Green EP, "Remote sensing handbook for tropical coastal management", pp.316~ (2000), UNESCO
- Hochberg EJ, "Capabilities of remote sensors to classify coral, algae and sand as pure and mixed spectra", Remote Sens Environ, 85, pp.174~189 (2003)
- Hochberg EJ, "Remote Sensing of Coral Reef Processes, In Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition", pp.25~35 (2011), Springer
- Jonker M, "Surveys of benthic reef communities using underwater digital photography and counts of juvenile corals, In Long-term Monitoring of the Great Barrier Reef", pp.75~ (2008), Australian Institute of Marine Science
- Joyce KE, "Combining Landsat ETM+ and Reef Check classifications for mapping coral reefs: a critical assessment from the southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia", Coral Reefs, 23, pp.21~25 (2004)
- Knudby A, "Mapping fish community variables by intergrating field and satellite data, object-based image analysis and modeling in a traditional Fijian fisheries management area", Remote Sens, 3, pp.460~483 (2011)
- Kuster T, "On the possibility of mapping living corals to the species level based on their optical signatures", Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 69, pp.607~614 (2006)
- Lam K, "A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities", J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 333, pp.115~128 (2006)
- Lyons M, "Integrating Quickbird Multi-Spectral Satellite and Field Data: Mapping Bathymetry, Seagrass Cover, Seagrass Species and Change in Moreton Bay, Australia in 2004, 2007", Remote Sens, 3, pp.42~64 (2011)
- 민지은, "고해상도 위성영상을 이용한 산호초 서식환경 모니터링 : 축라군 웨노섬을 중심으로", Ocean and Polar Research, 32(1), pp.53~61 (2010), 한국해양과학기술원
- Mumby PJ, "Mapping marine environments with IKONOS imagery: Enhanced spatial resolution can deliver greater thematic accuracy", Remote Sens Environ, 82, pp.248~257 (2002)
- Mumby PJ, "Coral reef habitat mapping: how much detail can remote sensing provide?", Mar Biol, 130, pp.193~202 (1997)
- Palandro DA, "Quantification of two decades of shallow-water coral reef habitat decline in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary using Landsat data (1984-2002)", Remote Sens Environ, 112, pp.3388~3399 (2008)
- A Manual for Conducting Georeferenced Photo Transects Surveys to Assess the Benthos of Coral Reef and Seagrass Habitats, "Roelfsema C", Centre for Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Science School of Geography, Planning & Environmental Management. University of Queensland, ~ (2009)
- Roelfsema C, "Mapping benthic habitats on Fijian coral reefs: Evaluating combined field and remote sensing approaches", Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Remote Sensing. The 28th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, pp.12~16 (2007)
- Roelfsema C, "The application of object based analysis of high spatial resolution imagery for mapping large coral reef systems in the West Pacific at geomorphic and benthic community spatial scales", Geosicience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) (2010)
- Scopélitis J, "The next step in shallow coral reef monitoring: Combining remote sensing and in situ approaches", Mar Pollut Bull, 60, pp.1958~1968 (2010)
- Scopélitis J, "Changes of coral communities over 35 years: Integrating in situ and remote-sensing data on Saint-Leu Reef (la Réuniton, Indian Ocean)", Estuar Coast Shelf Sci, 84, pp.342~352 (2009)
- Short FT, "The Seagrass Filter: Purification of Estuarine and Coastal Water, In The Estuary as a Filter", pp.395~413 (1984), Academic Press
- Smith VE, "Automated mapping and inventory of Great Barrier Reef zonation with Landsat data", Ocean 75 conference record, pp.775~780 (1975), Institute of Electrical and Eletronics Engineers, Inc
- Stevenson JC, "Comparative ecology of submersed grass beds in freshwater, estuarine and marine environments", Limnol Oceanogr, 33, pp.867~893 (1988)
- Wilkinson C, "Status of Coral Reef of the World: 2008" (2008), Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network and Reef and Rainforest Research Centre
- Yamano H, "Detection limits of coral reef bleaching by satellite remote sensing: simulation and data analysis", Remote Sens Environ, 90, pp.86~103 (2004)