남극연구에 대한 국가 간 협력연구 동향 분석
Research Trend Analysis on International Research Collaboration in Regard to Antarctic Studies
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze research activities related to Antarctic science through a bibliographic study and to understand and evaluate the implications. This study is based on 78,445 articles which were retrieved from the Science Citation Index(SCI) database during the period 1998−2015. Through a quantitative analysis and a Social Network Analysis, we made several findings and drew out the implications. First, many countries, in general, have increased multi-national research cooperation in order to enhance research productivity. However, Korea’s cooperative research activity is below the average level. Second, considering the 4 centrality indexes, which are derived from the SNA, Korea had a lower score in terms of centrality indexes. Based on these findings, Korea should formulate a more dynamic or proactive strategy in order to enhance its participation in international research cooperation efforts. Korea, the 10th country to build two or more research bases in Antarctica, should make greater efforts to bring the appropriate level of the phase.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze research activities related to Antarctic science through a bibliographic study and to understand and evaluate the implications. This study is based on 78,445 articles which were retrieved from the Science Citation Index(SCI) database during the period 1998−2015. Through a quantitative analysis and a Social Network Analysis, we made several findings and drew out the implications. First, many countries, in general, have increased multi-national research cooperation in order to enhance research productivity. However, Korea’s cooperative research activity is below the average level. Second, considering the 4 centrality indexes, which are derived from the SNA, Korea had a lower score in terms of centrality indexes. Based on these findings, Korea should formulate a more dynamic or proactive strategy in order to enhance its participation in international research cooperation efforts. Korea, the 10th country to build two or more research bases in Antarctica, should make greater efforts to bring the appropriate level of the phase.
참고문헌 (27)
- 곽기영, "소셜네트워크 분석", pp.212~ (2014), 청람
- 김용학, "과학기술 공동연구의 연결망 구조:좁은 세상과 위치효과", 한국사회학, 41(4), pp.68~103 (2007), 한국사회학회
- 박치성, "행정학 학문공동체의 공동연구 네트워크 구조에 관한 연구:1998-2009년간 24개 행정학 학술지의 논문공저자 네트워크의 분석을 중심으로", 한국사회와 행정연구, 22(4), pp.129~153 (2012), 서울행정학회
- "중국, 공격적 남극 투자: 서구 긴장 속 예의주시" (2015)[URL]
- 임병학, "사회 네트워크 분석을 활용한 물류 공저자들의협력 네트워크 구조 분석: 한국물류학회지를 중심으로", 물류학회지, 21(2), pp.205~229 (2011), 한국물류학회
- 허정은, "네트워크 분석을 통한 융합연구 구조 분석: 첨단융합기술개발사업을 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 16(4), pp.883~912 (2013), 한국기술혁신학회
- 과학기술 국제협력 스코어보드 구축, "KISTEP", 한국과학기술기획평가원, 100~ (2013)
- Aksnes DW, "The structure and development of polar research (1981−2007): a publicationbased approach", Arct Antarct Alp res, 41(2), pp.155~163 (2009)
- Alessandro C, "Geodetic and geophysical observations in Antarctica: an overview in the IPY perspective", pp.356~ (2008), Springer
- Barabási AL, "Emergence of scaling in random networks", Science, 286(5439), pp.509~512 (1999)
- Barabâsi AL, "Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations", Physica A, 311(3), pp.590~614 (2002)
- Cooper A, "Science diplomacy: science, Antarctica, and the governance of international spaces", pp.223~229 (2011), Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press
- Dastidar P, "Intellectual structure of Antarctic science : a 25-years analysis", Scientometrics, 77(3), pp.389~414 (2008)
- Elzinga A., "Through the lens of the polar years : changing characteristics of polar research in historical perspective", Polar Rec, 45(4), pp.313~336 (2009)
- Erb KA, "Science diplomacy: science, Antarctica, and the governance of international spaces", pp.265~270 (2011), Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press
- Erdős P, "On the strength of connectedness of a random graph", Acta Math Hung, 12(1), pp.261~267 (1961)
- Fogg GE, "A history of Antarctic science", pp.483~ (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Grossman JW., "Patterns of collaboration in mathematical research", SIAM News, 35(9), pp.8~9 (2002)
- Krupnik I, "Smithsonian at the poles: contributions to International Polar Year science", pp.405~ (2009), Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press
- Lüdecke C., "Scientific collaboration in Antarctica(1901–04) : A challenge in times of political rivalry", Polar Rec, 39(1), pp.35~48 (2003)
- Moody J., "The structure of a social science collaboration network : disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999", American sociological review, 69(2), pp.213~238 (2004)
- OECD, "Frascati manual 2015: guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities", pp.399~ (2015), OECD Publishing
- Summerhayes CP., "International collaboration in Antarctica : the international polar years, the international geophysical year, and the scientific committee on Antarctic research", Polar Rec, 44(4), pp.321~334 (2008)
- Walton DWH, "The need for environmental monitoring in Antarctica : baselines, environmental impact assessments, accidents and footprints", Int J Environ Anal Chem, 55(1−4), pp.77~90 (1994)
- Wegner DM, "Theories of group behavior", pp.185~208 (1987), Springer
- Wegner DM., "A computer network model of human transactive memory", Soc Cognition, 13(3), pp.319~339 (1995)
- "Science and engineering indicators 2016" (2016)[URL]