지능형 도로환경에서의 위치추적과 프라이버시 보호 - 미국의 최근 판례를 소재로 하여 -
The Location Tracking System and the Protection of Privacy on the Intelligent Roadway - A legal research on the recent cases in the United States -
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The relationship between privacy and ITS(especially, location tracking system) is reciprocal. Privacy will, without doubt, be affected by ITS(Intelligent Transportation Systems). But ITS(GPS) will also be affected by concerns about privacy. This circular relationship between privacy issues and ITS(GPS), is complicated by the fact that neither privacy nor ITS(GPS) is simple or static. There is evidence that privacy law in Korea is undergoing a paradigm shift in response to data collection by new technologies, and the privacy concerns raised by the deployment of ITS(GPS) are just one of the factors giving rise to a movement towards a stricter, or at least more comprehensive, privacy regime. 65)1)This article will explore some of the interesting interactions between privacy and GPS. It will begin by sketching the outlines of GPS technologies and will then consider the nature of privacy concerns about ITS(GPS), followed by a discussion of ITS concerns about privacy and privacy related laws potentially applicable to ITS(GPS). Protecting privacy should enhance the effectiveness, as well as the acceptance, of the intelligent roadway systems which will weave together tomorrow's surface roadway infrastructure. Strategic privacy regime reform needs to take place at all levels of government to overcome these obstacles. This reform should create guidelines for the managing of ITS information and data practices which maximizes the benefit of developing ITS(GPS) technologies while also providing uniform protections for citizens' privacy interests. Policymakers considering what to do about privacy and ITS(GPS) will likely seek to balance privacy against other individual and societal interests in deciding how to respond to privacy concerns. The simple idea that the future of ITS depends in no small part on proper respect for the privacy of ITS users is a starting point from which to begin to understand some of the relationships which bind together ITS(GPS) and privacy. Insistence on respect for individuality and personal choice will be among the great benefits which privacy and privacy law will contribute to the successful development and operation of ITS(GPS).
Abstract
The relationship between privacy and ITS(especially, location tracking system) is reciprocal. Privacy will, without doubt, be affected by ITS(Intelligent Transportation Systems). But ITS(GPS) will also be affected by concerns about privacy. This circular relationship between privacy issues and ITS(GPS), is complicated by the fact that neither privacy nor ITS(GPS) is simple or static. There is evidence that privacy law in Korea is undergoing a paradigm shift in response to data collection by new technologies, and the privacy concerns raised by the deployment of ITS(GPS) are just one of the factors giving rise to a movement towards a stricter, or at least more comprehensive, privacy regime. 65)1)This article will explore some of the interesting interactions between privacy and GPS. It will begin by sketching the outlines of GPS technologies and will then consider the nature of privacy concerns about ITS(GPS), followed by a discussion of ITS concerns about privacy and privacy related laws potentially applicable to ITS(GPS). Protecting privacy should enhance the effectiveness, as well as the acceptance, of the intelligent roadway systems which will weave together tomorrow's surface roadway infrastructure. Strategic privacy regime reform needs to take place at all levels of government to overcome these obstacles. This reform should create guidelines for the managing of ITS information and data practices which maximizes the benefit of developing ITS(GPS) technologies while also providing uniform protections for citizens' privacy interests. Policymakers considering what to do about privacy and ITS(GPS) will likely seek to balance privacy against other individual and societal interests in deciding how to respond to privacy concerns. The simple idea that the future of ITS depends in no small part on proper respect for the privacy of ITS users is a starting point from which to begin to understand some of the relationships which bind together ITS(GPS) and privacy. Insistence on respect for individuality and personal choice will be among the great benefits which privacy and privacy law will contribute to the successful development and operation of ITS(GPS).
참고문헌 (20)
- 김도경, "위치정보보호법의 제정에 따른 LBS산업의 규제정책 방향", 정보통신정책, 15(19) (2003)
- 권건보, "유비쿼터스 시대의 개인정보 침해와 법적 대응방안", 공법연구, 32(5), pp.159~194 (2004), 한국공법학회
- 권헌영, "전자정보시대의 개인정보보호법제의 발전방향", 한국전산원, ~ (2002)
- 이영대, "위치정보 규제와 개인정보 보호", 규제연구, 13(2), pp.155~200 (2004), 한국규제학회
- 오태원, "개인위치정보의 법적 문제와 위치기반서비스의 전망", 정보통신정책, 14(6) (2002)
- 윤수진, "U-City구현에 있어서의 개인정보보호", 공법연구, 35(1), pp.555~587 (2006), 한국공법학회
- 조용혁, "개인위치정보의 보호에 관한 법률적 고찰", 정보화정책, 12(2), pp.123~143 (2005), 한국정보화진흥원
- 함인선, "정보사회에서의 개인위치정보의 보호와 이용에 관한 법적 고찰", 선진상사법률연구, (44), pp.1~24 (2008), 법무부
- 공간정보이용촉진을 위한 법제도 연구, "황주성", 정보통신정책연구원, ~, pp.정책연구 01-18 (2001)
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2010), 박영사
- Aaron Reneger, "Satellite Tracking and the Right to Privacy", Hastings L.J., 53 (2002)
- Alan F. Westin, "Privacy and freedom" (1967), Atheneum
- April A. Otterberg, "GPS Tracking Technology: The Case for Revisiting Knots and Shifting the Supreme Court's Theory of the Public Space under the Fourth Amendment", B.C.L. Rev., 46 (2005)
- Dorothy J. Glancy, "Privacy and Intelligent Transportation Technology", Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J., 11 (1995)
- Dorothy J. Glancy, "Privacy on the Open Road", Ohio N.U. L. Rev., 30 (2004)
- Frank Douma, "Jordan Deckenbach, The challenge of ITS for the law of Privacy", J.L. Tech & Poly (2009)
- Laurie Thomas Lee, "Can Police Track Your Wireless Calls? Call Location Information and Privacy Law", Cardozo ART & ENT L.J., 21 (2003)
- Marc Jonathan Blitz, "Video Surveillance and the Constitution of Public Space: Fitting the Fourth Amendment to a World That Tracks Image and Identity", Tex. L. Rev., 82 (2004)
- William A. Herbert, "No direction Home: Will the Law Keep Pace with Human Tracking Technology to Protect Individual Privacy and Stop Geoslavery?", ISJLP, 2 (2006)
- William L. Prosser, "Prosser, Privacy", Cal. L. Rev., 48 (1960)
