본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국가관할권 이원 생물다양성 협정상 어업 문제에 관한 검토

Fisheries under the BBNJ Agreement

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류해양학

초록

The BBNJ Agreement, adopted on June 19, 2023, is considered to be the third implementation agreement of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea after the 1994 Part XI Implementation Agreement and the 1995 High Seas Fisheries Agreement. Of the four themes of the BBNJ Agreement, namely marine genetic resources, area-based management measures, environmental impact assessment, and capacity building and technology transfer, only the part relating to marine genetic resources is explicitly excluded from the scope of the BBNJ Agreement. There are no explicit exclusions in relation to area-based management measures and environmental impact assessments. Therefore, the sections on area-based management instruments and environmental impact assessments may conflict with fisheries issues in other international fisheries instruments during the implementation of the BBNJ Agreement. Although the BBNJ Agreement has a so-called “not-undermine” provision to ensure that it does not conflict with international fisheries instrument represented by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the 1995 High Seas Fisheries Agreement, and regional fisheries management organizations, it cannot be ruled out that the BBNJ Agreement may conflict with regional fisheries organizations' area-based management measures and environmental impact assessments. However, the potential for conflicts also implies the potential for developmental outcomes if they are harmoniously interpreted and implemented. First of all, the emergence of the BBNJ Agreement as a comprehensive treaty covering the high seas and the Area provides an opportunity to build an integrated mechanism for international fisheries insturments that were previously fragmented by regions and species. In addition, the BBNJ Agreement can establish a cooperation system with existing regional fisheries management organizations in the process of establishing area-based management measures and environmental impact assessment of cumulative fishing activities. In line with this, regional fisheries organizations may evolve in the future to proactively adopt legal framework changes and environmental protection measures that emerge from the implementation of the BBNJ Agreement.

Abstract

The BBNJ Agreement, adopted on June 19, 2023, is considered to be the third implementation agreement of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea after the 1994 Part XI Implementation Agreement and the 1995 High Seas Fisheries Agreement. Of the four themes of the BBNJ Agreement, namely marine genetic resources, area-based management measures, environmental impact assessment, and capacity building and technology transfer, only the part relating to marine genetic resources is explicitly excluded from the scope of the BBNJ Agreement. There are no explicit exclusions in relation to area-based management measures and environmental impact assessments. Therefore, the sections on area-based management instruments and environmental impact assessments may conflict with fisheries issues in other international fisheries instruments during the implementation of the BBNJ Agreement. Although the BBNJ Agreement has a so-called “not-undermine” provision to ensure that it does not conflict with international fisheries instrument represented by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the 1995 High Seas Fisheries Agreement, and regional fisheries management organizations, it cannot be ruled out that the BBNJ Agreement may conflict with regional fisheries organizations' area-based management measures and environmental impact assessments. However, the potential for conflicts also implies the potential for developmental outcomes if they are harmoniously interpreted and implemented. First of all, the emergence of the BBNJ Agreement as a comprehensive treaty covering the high seas and the Area provides an opportunity to build an integrated mechanism for international fisheries insturments that were previously fragmented by regions and species. In addition, the BBNJ Agreement can establish a cooperation system with existing regional fisheries management organizations in the process of establishing area-based management measures and environmental impact assessment of cumulative fishing activities. In line with this, regional fisheries organizations may evolve in the future to proactively adopt legal framework changes and environmental protection measures that emerge from the implementation of the BBNJ Agreement.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Bianca H, "Regional fisheries management organizations and the new biodiversity agreement: challenge or opportunity?", FISH FISH, 22(1), pp.226~231 (2021)[DOI]
  2. "ENB" (2016)[URL]
  3. "ENB" (2017)[URL]
  4. "ENB" (2017)[URL]
  5. "ENB" (2018)[URL]
  6. "ENB" (2019)[URL]
  7. "ENB" (2022)[URL]
  8. "ENB" (2023)[URL]
  9. Regulatory and governance gaps in the international regime for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, "Gjerde K", International Union for Conservation of Nature, 1~70 (2008)
  10. "How could the EIA provisions of the BBNJ Agreement apply to activities and existing bodies? 12 July 2021" (2021)[URL]
  11. "What is the rol e for regional fisheries management organisations in the future organisation of marine biodiversity management di scussed at the United Nations?" (2024)[URL]
  12. Marciniak KJ, "New implementing agreement under UN CLOS: a threat or an opportunity for fisheries governance?", Mar Policy, 84, pp.320~326 (2017)[DOI]
  13. "Southern Bluefïn Tuna Case between Australia and Japan and between New Zeal and and Japan, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Decision of 4 August 2000, Report of International Arbitration Arwards, Vol. XXIII, para. 22" (2000)[URL]
  14. "High seas treaty must reflec t critical role of fish in marine ecosystems: agreement can complement current efforts to manage valuable species su ch as tunas" (2022)[URL]
  15. "UN doc A/69/177" (2014)[URL]
  16. "UN doc. A/61/65" (2006)[URL]
  17. "UN doc. A/63/79" (2008)[URL]
  18. "UN doc. A/67/95" (2012)[URL]
  19. "UN doc. A/68/82" (2013)[URL]
  20. "UN doc. A/69/780" (2015)[URL]
  21. "UN doc. A/76/L.46" (2022)[URL]
  22. "UN doc. A/CONF.210/2006/1" (2006)[URL]
  23. "UN doc. A/CONF.232/2020/3" (2020)[URL]
  24. "UN doc. A/CONF.232/2022/5" (2022)[URL]
  25. "UN doc. A/CONF.232/2023/2" (2023)[URL]
  26. "UN doc. A/CONF.232/2023/4" (2023)[URL]
  27. "UN doc. A/DEC/74/543, Resolutions and Decisions ad opted by the General Assembly during its 74th session- Volume 3 - A/74/49(Vol.III) - 2020" (2020)[URL]
  28. "UN doc. A/RES/60/30" (2005)[URL]
  29. "UN doc. A/RES/69/292" (2015)[URL]
  30. "UN doc. A/RES/72/249" (2017)[URL]
  31. "UN doc. A/RES/77/321" (2023)[URL]
  32. "UNTC" (1982)[URL]
  33. "UNTC" (1996)[URL]
  34. "UNTC" (1996)[URL]
  35. "UNTC" (2001)[URL]
  36. "UNTC" (2001)[URL]
  37. "UNTC" (2003)[URL]
  38. "UNTC" (2012)[URL]
  39. "UNTC" (2012)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (1건)