ONE YEAR AFTER THE SUMMIT: NORTH KOREA’S POLICY DIRECTIONS AND PROSPECTS FOR INTER-KOREAN RELATIONS
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
With the dramatic inter-Korean summit in June of 2000, inter-Korean relations were expected to enter into a new era of reconciliation and cooperation. The summit was consequently followed by a number of events on the Korean peninsula. The two Koreas met for ministerial-level talks, reunions of separated family members, defense minister talks, and other events. North Korea actively expanded its foreign relations. It normalized diplomatic relations with 13 EU countries as well as Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, and Canada; it also joined the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). North Korea’s vice marshal Jo Myong-rok visited Washington and U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright paid a visit to Pyongyang. North Korea’s attitude seemed to be different from that of the past. It was generally agreed that the inter-Korean relationship is undergoing an irreversible change for the better. The prospects for inter-Korean relations seemed bright, at least in the short-run, although long-term prospects for inter-Korean relations are not yet so clear. However, the rosy picture of inter-Korean relations began to be overshadowed by North Korea’s boycott of inter-Korean meetings such as the fifth round of ministerial-level talks and Red Cross talks, which took place following the inauguration of the Bush administration in the U.S. Now, inter-Korean relations appear to greatly depend on the relations between Washington and Pyongyang. The purpose of this paper is to analyze North Korea’s policy direction and prospects for inter-Korean relations in the postsummit era. First, this paper reviews North Korea’s changing survival strategies in the 90’s. Secondly, this paper will analyze North Korea’s policy goals and hurdles that must be overcome to develop inter-Korean relations. Thirdly, this paper analyzes North Korea’s foreign policy direction and prospects for inter- Korean relations
Abstract
With the dramatic inter-Korean summit in June of 2000, inter-Korean relations were expected to enter into a new era of reconciliation and cooperation. The summit was consequently followed by a number of events on the Korean peninsula. The two Koreas met for ministerial-level talks, reunions of separated family members, defense minister talks, and other events. North Korea actively expanded its foreign relations. It normalized diplomatic relations with 13 EU countries as well as Australia, New Zealand, the Philippines, and Canada; it also joined the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF). North Korea’s vice marshal Jo Myong-rok visited Washington and U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright paid a visit to Pyongyang. North Korea’s attitude seemed to be different from that of the past. It was generally agreed that the inter-Korean relationship is undergoing an irreversible change for the better. The prospects for inter-Korean relations seemed bright, at least in the short-run, although long-term prospects for inter-Korean relations are not yet so clear. However, the rosy picture of inter-Korean relations began to be overshadowed by North Korea’s boycott of inter-Korean meetings such as the fifth round of ministerial-level talks and Red Cross talks, which took place following the inauguration of the Bush administration in the U.S. Now, inter-Korean relations appear to greatly depend on the relations between Washington and Pyongyang. The purpose of this paper is to analyze North Korea’s policy direction and prospects for inter-Korean relations in the postsummit era. First, this paper reviews North Korea’s changing survival strategies in the 90’s. Secondly, this paper will analyze North Korea’s policy goals and hurdles that must be overcome to develop inter-Korean relations. Thirdly, this paper analyzes North Korea’s foreign policy direction and prospects for inter- Korean relations
