Unified Korea between U.S. and China:Its Strategic Choices for the Future
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Even if a unified Korea emerges as a potential major economic and military power with a combined population of 80-million, it will have to deal with U.S.-China strategic competition that goes beyond the Korean peninsula. The United States will make efforts to persuade a unified Korea to maintain its military alliance for broader strategic purposes, and China will try to bring Korea onto China’s side by offering incentives such as investment and financial support for the reconstruction of the Northern part of a unified Korea. Considering that a unified Korea will need help from both the U.S. and China in order to stabilize former North Korean territory and build essential industrial infrastructure there, unified Korea’s realistic policy would be to encourage both great powers to accept unified Korea’s unique status in an effort to resolve or mitigate differences between neighboring powers while not strongly aligning itself with either major power. Rather than providing the line of defense for either of the great powers, a unified Korea will need to maintain a loose alliance relationship with the U.S. while actively pursuing cooperation with China in all aspects aside from conventional military security.
Abstract
Even if a unified Korea emerges as a potential major economic and military power with a combined population of 80-million, it will have to deal with U.S.-China strategic competition that goes beyond the Korean peninsula. The United States will make efforts to persuade a unified Korea to maintain its military alliance for broader strategic purposes, and China will try to bring Korea onto China’s side by offering incentives such as investment and financial support for the reconstruction of the Northern part of a unified Korea. Considering that a unified Korea will need help from both the U.S. and China in order to stabilize former North Korean territory and build essential industrial infrastructure there, unified Korea’s realistic policy would be to encourage both great powers to accept unified Korea’s unique status in an effort to resolve or mitigate differences between neighboring powers while not strongly aligning itself with either major power. Rather than providing the line of defense for either of the great powers, a unified Korea will need to maintain a loose alliance relationship with the U.S. while actively pursuing cooperation with China in all aspects aside from conventional military security.
참고문헌 (36)
- "Stephen Haggard on China-North Korea Trade" (2017)[URL]
- Bell, Burwell B., "South Korea Leads the Warfight", Joint Forces Quarterly, (47), pp.80~86 (2007)
- "China’s Response to Collapse in North Korea" (2014)[URL]
- Carpenter, Ted Galen, "The Korean Conundrum: America’s Troubled Relations with North and South Korea" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
- 조남훈, "한반도 통일 시 발생할 불안정성 진단과한국이 취해야 할 대외정책 방향", 전략연구, 22(65), pp.35~59 (2015), (사) 한국전략문제연구소
- "North Korea Rents Out Its Resources to Stave Off Reform" (2011)[URL]
- "China Investing Heavily in N. Korean Resources" (2007)[URL]
- Chung, Cheol-ho, "The Status and Role of the UNC after the Transfer of the Wartime Operational Control", Sejong Policy Studies, 6(2), pp.197~239 (2010)
- "How America Views China-South Korea Bilateralism" (2003)[URL]
- "What China's Northeast Project Is All About" (2008)[URL]
- Solving Long Division: The Geopolitical Implications of Korean Unification, "Cronin, Patrick", Center for New American Security, ~ (2015)
- "South Korea's Economic Dependence on China" (2015)[URL]
- Green, Michael J., "By More than Providence: Grand Strategy and American Power in the Asia Pacific Since 1783" (2017), Columbia University Press
- Helvey, David F., "Korean Unification and the Future of the U.S.-ROK Alliance", Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Strategic Forum (2016)
- "Hanbando tongilyi joonggukye michil peonikbiyong bunseok (A Study to Analyze Cost-Benefits of the Reunification of Korean Peninsula for China)" (2015)[URL]
- "Open North Korea: Economic Benefits to China from the Distance Effect in Trade" (2014)[URL]
- Kim, Il-young, "US Forces in Korea: Its History, Controversies, and Prospects" (2003), Hanwool Academy
- "Solving Long Division: The Geopolitical Implications of Korean Unification" (2015)[URL]
- Lee, Jeongseok, "Back to Normal? The End of the THAAD Dispute between China and South Korea", China Brief, 17(15) (2017), Jamestown Foundation
- "The Chinese Dream in Peril: Xi Jinping and the Korean Crisis" (2017)[URL]
- Mitchell, Derek J., "Korea-U.S. Relations in Transition: Korea-U.S. Alliance in Retrospect and Prospects for a New Strategic Partnership" (2002), The Sejong Institute
- "How China Sees THAAD" (2016)[URL]
- "If Korea Were to Unite…" (2013)[URL]
- Qingguo, Jia, "Time to prepare for the worst in North Korea", East Asia Forum, ~ (2017)
- Sandole, Dennis, "NATO after Sixty Years: A Stable Crisis" (2012), The Kent State University Press
- "Advancing U.S.-Japan-ROK Trilateral Cooperation: A U.S. Perspective" (2016)[URL]
- Snyder, Scott, "China-Korea Relations: Two Koreas Defy Chinese Sanctions", Comparative Connections, 19(1), pp.83~94 (2017)
- "Joint Vision for the Alliance of the United States of America and the Republic of Korea" (2009)[URL]
- "How China Could Benefit From a Unified Korea.” The Diplomat" (2014)[URL]
- Wang, Gungwu, "The Cambridge History of China, vol. 8: The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- "How an Ancient Kingdom Explains Today’s China-Korea Relations" (2013)[URL]
- "China’s Harsh Words Mask a Trade Boom With South Korea" (2017)[URL]
- "America’s Next Move in Asia: A Japan-South Korea Alliance" (2016)[URL]
- Woo, Jung-yeop, "Misinformation Hinders Debate on THAAD Deployment in Korea", Asia Pacific Bulletin, (319) (2015), East-West Center
- "Warning: Is China Pivoting Back to North Korea?" (2016)[URL]
- Zhou, Fangyin, "Equilibrium Analysis of the Tributary System", Chinese Journal of International Politics, 4(2), pp.147~178 (2011)
