試論＂重寫文學史＂論議在1990年代主要中國 文學史編寫過程上的反映情況

Abstract

Succeeding to my previous research which examines the literary histories of the beginning of twentieth century, this paper seeks to examine the characteristics of editors' viewpoints and of editing system by taking a look at Chinese literary histories published during 1990s. For this purpose, I compare differences and similarities in editions of diachronic style literary history published in this period, and then both analyse and compare A short History of Chinese Literature (1992) by Chen Yugang[陳玉剛, 『中國文學通史簡編』(共2冊)], A Guide to Chinese Literary History (1994) edited by China Grand Encyclopedia Press[中國大百科全書出版社, 『中國文學史通覽』], Chinese Literary History (1997) edited by Zhang Jiong, Deng Shaoji, Pan Jun[張炯､鄧紹基､樊駿, 『中華文學通史』(共10冊)], Chinese Literary History (1998) edited by Zhang Peiheng, Luo Ming[章培恒､駱玉明, 『中國文學史』(共3冊)], Chinese Literary History (1999) edited by Yuan Xingpei[袁行霈, 『中國文學史』(共4冊)]. In conclusion, 5 kinds of Chinese literary history, all of them are wrote for teaching aids, and there are some difference in explanation of each genres among them, but most of them are similar with the area of poetry, prose, novel, and drama genre. Concerning to periodization of Chinese literary history, except Chen Yugang's, 4 kinds of Chinese literary histories, while has a some difference chronically in limit of modern age, they have covered all traditional and modern literature together. In case of Yuan Xingpei's work, they suggest a harmony of periodizations by dynasty and literature itself, but in the last return to periodization by dynasty. From the half of 80s, there was ‘Rewriting Chinese History Movement’, it based on the ‘Heat of culture discussion’ and the tendency of macroscopic research. 5 kinds of Chinese literary history in 90s mostly emphasis the importance of making the literature standard literary history's principle. Although we need further discussion in some area, I think, it represent the change of viewpoints of the researchers under the influence of ‘Rewriting Chinese History Movement’.