京劇 ≪六月雪≫ 고찰- 元雜劇≪竇娥寃≫, 明傳奇≪金鎖記≫와의 비교를 중심으로 -
The Study on Jingju <Liuyuexue> Compared with Zaju <Doueyuan> and Chuanqi <Jinsuoji>
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated drama of Jingju <Liuyuexue>(京劇 ≪六月雪≫) and reviewed the reform of Doue(竇娥)'s drama. First, arrangement patterns of detailed idioms in Reform, change patterns of image of character, and differences of themes were compared and considered the gains and losses of drama of Jingju <Liuyuexue>(京劇 ≪六月雪≫). The gains of the drama of Jingju <Liuyuexue>(京劇 ≪六月雪≫) were to be strengthened dramatism, to be secularized the language, and that theme was corresponded to sense of reality. On the other hand, it was weakened literary value and had the limitation of Zhezixi(折子戱) in stage in spite of full version. Dispassionately Chengyanqiu(程硯秋)‘s the reform did more harm than good. He just, as one member of Sidamingdan(四大名旦), made <Doueyuan> which Dan(旦) played as a main character, made his own major work and endeared Doue as a drama character to all by increasing or reducing the length of the chapter as audience's preference. This part should be estimated fairly. Reform of drama was quite useful way to be spread and continued and the process of changing old with new. Chengyanqiu(程硯秋) pursued reform excellent and tried to succeed to the essence of the tradition by reflecting the new color of an era to old Doue's drama. Although Chengyanqiu(程硯秋)‘s the version of Jingju was not complete reform, it has the historical significance of drama in that Doue still remains in present, not disappeared.
Abstract
This study investigated drama of Jingju <Liuyuexue>(京劇 ≪六月雪≫) and reviewed the reform of Doue(竇娥)'s drama. First, arrangement patterns of detailed idioms in Reform, change patterns of image of character, and differences of themes were compared and considered the gains and losses of drama of Jingju <Liuyuexue>(京劇 ≪六月雪≫). The gains of the drama of Jingju <Liuyuexue>(京劇 ≪六月雪≫) were to be strengthened dramatism, to be secularized the language, and that theme was corresponded to sense of reality. On the other hand, it was weakened literary value and had the limitation of Zhezixi(折子戱) in stage in spite of full version. Dispassionately Chengyanqiu(程硯秋)‘s the reform did more harm than good. He just, as one member of Sidamingdan(四大名旦), made <Doueyuan> which Dan(旦) played as a main character, made his own major work and endeared Doue as a drama character to all by increasing or reducing the length of the chapter as audience's preference. This part should be estimated fairly. Reform of drama was quite useful way to be spread and continued and the process of changing old with new. Chengyanqiu(程硯秋) pursued reform excellent and tried to succeed to the essence of the tradition by reflecting the new color of an era to old Doue's drama. Although Chengyanqiu(程硯秋)‘s the version of Jingju was not complete reform, it has the historical significance of drama in that Doue still remains in present, not disappeared.
참고문헌 (30)
- 王季思, "元雜劇論集 上"
- 聶石樵, "元雜劇論集 上"
- 周寅賓, "論古代戱曲心理過程的描寫", 文學遺産, (3) (1985)
- 邵品剛, "≪竇娥寃≫歷史的重演", 國劇月刊, ~
- 祝肇年, "≪竇娥寃≫故事源流漫述", 戱曲硏究, 6
- 薛瑞兆, "論宋代戱曲形成的標志及原因", 文學遺産, (4) (1986)
- 古添洪, "悲劇;感天動地竇娥寃", 中外文學, (8) (1976)
- 王士儀, "錢與命;≪竇娥寃≫的主題分析提要"
- 牛川海, "元雜劇≪竇娥寃≫之硏究", 中國古代, 近代文學硏究
- 具洸範, "(竇娥寃)與(雷雨)比較硏究", 석사, pp.1992
- 冯沅君, "怎样看待≪窦娥冤≫及其改编本", 文学评论, (4) (1965)
- 王卫民, "≪窦娥冤≫与历代改编本之比较", 华中理工大学学报社会科学版, (3) (1994)
- 母进炎, "接受·扬弃·创造-≪窦娥冤≫与明传奇≪金锁记≫戏曲艺术经验传承比较研究", 贵州师范大学学报, (6) (2002)
- 王会敏, "经典的消解-论京剧≪六月雪≫对关汉卿杂剧≪窦娥冤≫的改编", 兰州教育学院学报, (2) (2007)
- 张勤, "近20年来≪窦娥冤≫研究综述", 襄樊職業技術學院學報, (1) (2009)
- 郝青云, "元杂剧≪窦娥冤≫与明传奇≪金锁记≫的主题比较", 内蒙古民族大学学报 (2009)
- 张晓晓, "悲剧意识的淡化:≪窦娥冤≫与≪金锁记≫比较研究", 乐山师范大学学报 (2010)
- 诸葛元元, "程砚秋≪六月雪≫与关汉卿的≪窦娥冤≫的比较研究" (2012)
- "全明傳奇.金鎖記", 天一出版社
- 臧晋叔, "元曲選" (1974), 中華書局
- 申洪哲, "關漢卿雜劇硏究", 석사, pp.1980
- 閔庚德, "元雜劇(竇娥寃)에 대한 硏究", 석사, 중국문학, pp.1989
- 이영규, "두아원 잡극 연구 : 悲劇性에 관하여", 석사, pp.1986
- 鄭元止, "≪竇娥寃≫考", 中國人文科學, 2 (1983)
- 朴祥希, "關漢卿의 <感天動地竇娥寃> 雜劇 연구", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.1992
- 金亨蘭, "雜劇≪竇娥寃≫과 傳奇≪金鎖記≫比較硏究", 석사, pp.1995
- 안지영, "원잡극 《두아원》과 《햄릿》의 비교연구 : 비극성을 중심으로", 석사, 중문학, pp.2004
- 김형란, "雜劇≪竇娥寃≫의 根源故事 考察", 중국인문과학, 32(32), pp.145~157 (2006), 중국인문학회
- 이태복, "≪春香傳≫과 元雜劇 ≪竇娥怨≫의 비교연구", 한국언어문화, 36(36), pp.249~274 (2008), 한국언어문화학회
- 심미진, "<두아원> 연구", 석사, 중국어교육, pp.2009
